AARoads Forum

Non-Road Boards => Off-Topic => Topic started by: index on December 19, 2021, 03:30:59 PM

Title: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: index on December 19, 2021, 03:30:59 PM
This would be something like:
But not limited strictly to population, as the example with both Jeffersons shows
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on December 19, 2021, 03:47:32 PM
Indiana:

North Vernon is much bigger than Vernon.

West Lafayette is not as big as Lafayette but arguably "more major" due to the presence of Purdue.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: hotdogPi on December 19, 2021, 03:52:21 PM
North Adams, MA
Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on December 19, 2021, 03:55:31 PM
New Delhi, India (capital of India)
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
West Palm Beach, FL (pop. ~117k) is much bigger than Palm Beach (pop. ~8k).

Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC, but it's two largest suburbs, North Charleston and Mount Pleasant, rank third and fourth, respectively.

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: hotdogPi on December 19, 2021, 06:28:19 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.

Quote from: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC ... Mount Pleasant ....

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.

None of these are child/parent.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:38:28 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 19, 2021, 06:28:19 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.

Quote from: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC ... Mount Pleasant ....

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.

None of these are child/parent.

The Presidio of San Francisco and Mission San Francisco de Asis do predate Pueblo de San Jose de Guadalupe.  Without the Presidio of San Francisco the Spanish development of San Francisco Bay would have come much later.  So, I'm going to disagree with you there that there isn't a parental community relationship between San Francisco and San Jose. 
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: SkyPesos on December 19, 2021, 06:46:16 PM
New Taipei City is more populous than neighboring Taipei.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 06:46:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:38:28 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 19, 2021, 06:28:19 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.

Quote from: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC ... Mount Pleasant ....

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.

None of these are child/parent.

The Presidio of San Francisco and Mission San Francisco de Asis do predate Pueblo de San Jose de Guadalupe.  Without the Presidio of San Francisco the Spanish development of San Francisco Bay would have come much later.  So, I'm going to disagree with you there that there isn't a parental community relationship between San Francisco and San Jose.
Not in the same terms as the OP.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:58:38 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 06:46:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:38:28 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 19, 2021, 06:28:19 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.

Quote from: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC ... Mount Pleasant ....

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.

None of these are child/parent.

The Presidio of San Francisco and Mission San Francisco de Asis do predate Pueblo de San Jose de Guadalupe.  Without the Presidio of San Francisco the Spanish development of San Francisco Bay would have come much later.  So, I'm going to disagree with you there that there isn't a parental community relationship between San Francisco and San Jose.
Not in the same terms as the OP.

I'm not really seeing anything of the like explicitly stated by the OP, I'm just seeing his/her examples.  Considering this is the Off Topic board why would I assume we are only restricting this to what is being used for control cities on modern highways? 
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: hotdogPi on December 19, 2021, 07:02:42 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:58:38 PM
I'm not really seeing anything of the like explicitly stated by the OP, I'm just seeing his/her examples.  Considering this is the Off Topic board why would I assume we are only restricting this to what is being used for control cities on modern highways?

It has nothing to do with control cities. It has to with similarly named locations.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 07:18:55 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 19, 2021, 07:02:42 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:58:38 PM
I'm not really seeing anything of the like explicitly stated by the OP, I'm just seeing his/her examples.  Considering this is the Off Topic board why would I assume we are only restricting this to what is being used for control cities on modern highways?

It has nothing to do with control cities. It has to with similarly named locations.

Again, not explicitly stated in the thread title or in the original post.  Perhaps the OP ought to be more clear on his/her rules on the rules if a wide net of possible answers isn't desirable.

Here is one by the criteria you describe; Wendover, Utah was established as a Western Pacific Railroad siding circa 1908.  West Wendover, Nevada didn't develop until a decades after the settlement of Wendover.  Wendover was largely fueled by freight commerce and the military until the late 1960s.  West Wendover and took advantage of being able to fuel it's economy via legalized gambling and now is several times larger in population than Wendover. 
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: jp the roadgeek on December 19, 2021, 07:25:33 PM
In CT
Old Lyme and East Lyme are more populous than Lyme
East Haddam is larger than Haddam and has a slightly higher population
Southington, formerly known as South Farmington, is bigger and is more populous than Farmington

Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 07:26:21 PM
Virginia Beach is bigger than Norfolk.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: ilpt4u on December 19, 2021, 07:34:09 PM
New Amsterdam is much bigger than Amsterdam

New York is much bigger than York

That settlement by the Dutch, then the English in the New World has done OK for itself
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Mr. Matté on December 19, 2021, 08:38:23 PM
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on December 19, 2021, 07:25:33 PM
In CT
Old Lyme and East Lyme are more populous than Lyme
East Haddam is larger than Haddam and has a slightly higher population
Southington, formerly known as South Farmington, is bigger and is more populous than Farmington

I'm on another website doing my other hobby of historic elections, right now I'm doing state HOR elections from the 1960s-1990s. I encounter New Hartford and New Fairfield as I cycle through the years. I wonder what those towns' founders intents were, whether they thought the "New" towns (not to be confused with Newtown) were going to be more prosperous than the "old" towns or just a place where they could lord over the people who move in.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 09:05:33 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:58:38 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 06:46:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:38:28 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 19, 2021, 06:28:19 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.

Quote from: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC ... Mount Pleasant ....

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.

None of these are child/parent.

The Presidio of San Francisco and Mission San Francisco de Asis do predate Pueblo de San Jose de Guadalupe.  Without the Presidio of San Francisco the Spanish development of San Francisco Bay would have come much later.  So, I'm going to disagree with you there that there isn't a parental community relationship between San Francisco and San Jose.
Not in the same terms as the OP.

I'm not really seeing anything of the like explicitly stated by the OP, I'm just seeing his/her examples.  Considering this is the Off Topic board why would I assume we are only restricting this to what is being used for control cities on modern highways?
Not too many contributors on your side of the line on this one...
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: plain on December 19, 2021, 09:11:50 PM
In NJ, Both East and West Orange are more populated than Orange.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 09:17:27 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 09:05:33 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:58:38 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 06:46:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:38:28 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 19, 2021, 06:28:19 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.

Quote from: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC ... Mount Pleasant ....

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.

None of these are child/parent.

The Presidio of San Francisco and Mission San Francisco de Asis do predate Pueblo de San Jose de Guadalupe.  Without the Presidio of San Francisco the Spanish development of San Francisco Bay would have come much later.  So, I'm going to disagree with you there that there isn't a parental community relationship between San Francisco and San Jose.
Not in the same terms as the OP.

I'm not really seeing anything of the like explicitly stated by the OP, I'm just seeing his/her examples.  Considering this is the Off Topic board why would I assume we are only restricting this to what is being used for control cities on modern highways?
Not too many contributors on your side of the line on this one...

Is this even worth arguing over?  I feel like you guys often just suck any fun out of these threads. 
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: jlam on December 19, 2021, 09:19:42 PM
West Wendover is larger than Wendover
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 10:31:25 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 09:17:27 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 09:05:33 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:58:38 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 06:46:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:38:28 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 19, 2021, 06:28:19 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.

Quote from: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC ... Mount Pleasant ....

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.

None of these are child/parent.

The Presidio of San Francisco and Mission San Francisco de Asis do predate Pueblo de San Jose de Guadalupe.  Without the Presidio of San Francisco the Spanish development of San Francisco Bay would have come much later.  So, I'm going to disagree with you there that there isn't a parental community relationship between San Francisco and San Jose.
Not in the same terms as the OP.

I'm not really seeing anything of the like explicitly stated by the OP, I'm just seeing his/her examples.  Considering this is the Off Topic board why would I assume we are only restricting this to what is being used for control cities on modern highways?
Not too many contributors on your side of the line on this one...

Is this even worth arguing over?  I feel like you guys often just suck any fun out of these threads. 

Following the rules is fun.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: wxfree on December 19, 2021, 10:36:23 PM
New Boston, Texas is much bigger than Boston.  New Boston is a city that now covers the unincorporated place of Boston, but Boston still exists in law because it's the county seat.  In Texas, a county seat can't be changed except through an election.  Usually an unincorporated town becomes a neighborhood of a city it's annexed into, but this one will always have a separate status.  New Boston, Texas is also much bigger than Old Boston.  Old Boston is within 2 miles of the city limit of New Boston and will probably eventually be annexed and no longer exist as a separate place.

The original county seat is Boston, at the location of Old Boston.  In an election, a supermajority voted to move the county seat to a location not near the center of the county, Texarkana.  Later, a majority voted to move it back near the center of the county.  (Old) Boston was a little too far south, so the new seat was a few miles to the north.  They couldn't get a post office with a name they wanted, so they decided to move the Boston post office and use that name for the new county seat.  Boston then became Old Boston.  New Boston was built before the county seat was moved the first time.  The railroad bypassed the original county seat, and New Boston was built at the point on the railroad closest to Boston.  Then the county seat moved, and was moved back but a little further north, and was eventually annexed into New Boston.

A child city consumes its parent, while the parent is also its younger sibling.  It then continues to grow and threatens to consume its other parent and grandparent-because-it's-the-parent-of-its-younger-sibling/parent.  This is what Greek mythology/Freudian nightmares are made of.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: CoolAngrybirdsrio4 on December 20, 2021, 12:02:42 AM
North Manchester, IN is incorporated and bigger than Manchester, IN.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Road Hog on December 20, 2021, 01:44:07 AM
Quote from: wxfree on December 19, 2021, 10:36:23 PM
New Boston, Texas is much bigger than Boston.  New Boston is a city that now covers the unincorporated place of Boston, but Boston still exists in law because it's the county seat.  In Texas, a county seat can't be changed except through an election.  Usually an unincorporated town becomes a neighborhood of a city it's annexed into, but this one will always have a separate status.  New Boston, Texas is also much bigger than Old Boston.  Old Boston is within 2 miles of the city limit of New Boston and will probably eventually be annexed and no longer exist as a separate place.

The original county seat is Boston, at the location of Old Boston.  In an election, a supermajority voted to move the county seat to a location not near the center of the county, Texarkana.  Later, a majority voted to move it back near the center of the county.  (Old) Boston was a little too far south, so the new seat was a few miles to the north.  They couldn't get a post office with a name they wanted, so they decided to move the Boston post office and use that name for the new county seat.  Boston then became Old Boston.  New Boston was built before the county seat was moved the first time.  The railroad bypassed the original county seat, and New Boston was built at the point on the railroad closest to Boston.  Then the county seat moved, and was moved back but a little further north, and was eventually annexed into New Boston.

A child city consumes its parent, while the parent is also its younger sibling.  It then continues to grow and threatens to consume its other parent and grandparent-because-it's-the-parent-of-its-younger-sibling/parent.  This is what Greek mythology/Freudian nightmares are made of.
I was going to mention New Boston. The Bowie County Courthouse sits right off of I-30. I mentioned it on a thread I started on non-traditional county courthouses a few years back.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: GenExpwy on December 20, 2021, 04:55:06 AM
The city of North Tonawanda NY has about twice as many people as the city of Tonawanda, but less than half as many as the town of Tonawanda (which does not include the city).
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: GaryV on December 20, 2021, 09:46:29 AM
Quote from: ilpt4u on December 19, 2021, 07:34:09 PM
New Amsterdam is much bigger than Amsterdam

New York is much bigger than York

That settlement by the Dutch, then the English in the New World has done OK for itself

Boston MA is also much larger than Boston UK.  (This probably applies to a number of New World cities named after their Old World counterparts by the settlers who moved from the old town.)

Toledo OH is larger than Toledo Spain - but it's not clear if the Ohio city was named after the one in Spain.

Troy MI is larger than Troy NY - and I'm sure both are larger than Troy (of the Trojan war) in now-Turkey ever was.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: SkyPesos on December 20, 2021, 09:50:16 AM
Portland, OR is bigger than Portland, ME. The former is named after the latter from a coin flip. If the coin landed on the other side, it would've been named Boston, OR.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: kurumi on December 20, 2021, 12:10:48 PM
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on December 19, 2021, 07:25:33 PM
In CT
Old Lyme and East Lyme are more populous than Lyme
East Haddam is larger than Haddam and has a slightly higher population
Southington, formerly known as South Farmington, is bigger and is more populous than Farmington

East Hampton (12,717) is much larger than Hampton (1,728)  (facetious; the towns are not adjacent, and East Hampton was originally named Chatham)
North Canaan (3,211) is larger than Canaan (1,080). To muddle things, the village of Canaan (at US 7/44) is in North Canaan.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: bing101 on December 20, 2021, 06:31:24 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.
Central Valley: Fresno is the largest inland  city in California while Sacramento gets more attention as California's most notable inland  city.


Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: lepidopteran on December 20, 2021, 09:09:28 PM
In NJ, the townships of East Windsor and West Windsor are much larger than the unincorporated hamlet of Windsor.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: DandyDan on December 21, 2021, 07:25:39 AM
East Bethel, MN has a much larger population than Bethel.

West Concord, MN has only 782 for a population, but Concord is little more than a dot on a map.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: index on December 21, 2021, 11:58:53 AM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 10:31:25 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 09:17:27 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 09:05:33 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:58:38 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 06:46:17 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:38:28 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 19, 2021, 06:28:19 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on December 19, 2021, 03:52:55 PM
Mount Airy is bigger than Dobson.

Quote from: wriddle082 on December 19, 2021, 04:34:23 PM
Charleston, SC is the largest city in SC ... Mount Pleasant ....

Not really sure if this counts because they're a little ways away from each other, but what about San Jose (pop. 1,013,000) being larger than San Francisco (pop. 873k)?

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 19, 2021, 06:27:12 PM
San Jose is the largest city in the San Francisco Bay Area.  San Francisco is by far the most densely populated.

None of these are child/parent.

The Presidio of San Francisco and Mission San Francisco de Asis do predate Pueblo de San Jose de Guadalupe.  Without the Presidio of San Francisco the Spanish development of San Francisco Bay would have come much later.  So, I'm going to disagree with you there that there isn't a parental community relationship between San Francisco and San Jose.
Not in the same terms as the OP.

I'm not really seeing anything of the like explicitly stated by the OP, I'm just seeing his/her examples.  Considering this is the Off Topic board why would I assume we are only restricting this to what is being used for control cities on modern highways?
Not too many contributors on your side of the line on this one...

Is this even worth arguing over?  I feel like you guys often just suck any fun out of these threads. 

Following the rules is fun.
If you all want a verdict, the suburb-main city relationship isn't something I was looking for, correct, but I think it fits reasonably well now that I see it.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: webny99 on December 21, 2021, 12:20:50 PM
Quote from: index on December 21, 2021, 11:58:53 AM
If you all want a verdict, the suburb-main city relationship isn't something I was looking for, correct, but I think it fits reasonably well now that I see it.

Indeed. I actually had the opposite view when I first read the thread title; to me something like Tonawanda/North Tonawanda is more of a sibling relationship, whereas I view the city/suburb relationship more like a parent/child one.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: golden eagle on January 04, 2022, 04:27:21 PM
I'm not sure if this counts, but Cape Coral is grown to be much larger than Fort Myers. Cape Coral was a planned community.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: MATraveler128 on January 04, 2022, 05:00:07 PM
Also in Florida, West Palm Beach has a larger population than Palm Beach, with West Palm having 117K vs Palm Beach's 9K people.

Edit: Just realized upthread that this was already mentioned. Oops.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: MATraveler128 on January 04, 2022, 05:15:59 PM
This one doesn't really count, but there's Kingston, RI and South Kingstown, RI. So close and yet so far.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: epzik8 on January 04, 2022, 06:33:35 PM
East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Molandfreak on January 05, 2022, 10:05:33 AM
West Concord, MN had a major railroad running through it, and it's bigger than Concord, MN today.

Mendota Heights, MN is urban sprawl that the city of Mendota wasn't interested in annexing for some reason, so it's the more populated while Mendota is really just the historic part.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: JKRhodes on February 03, 2022, 10:46:44 PM
Prescott, Arizona has recently been surpassed in population by Prescott Valley with the former having a population of 45,827 and the latter having 46,785 per the 2020 census.

Prescott Valley had a population of around 1500, back in 1978 when it incorporated. It has the advantage of having more room to expand, while Prescott proper is somewhat landlocked by forest land, indian reservations, terrain, etc.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: DTComposer on February 03, 2022, 11:32:31 PM
Covina, CA was incorporated in 1901 and West Covina, CA was incorporated in 1923. By 1950 West Covina was bigger than Covina, and today it is over twice as large (106K vs. 51K).

On the Palos Verdes Peninsula, the city of Palos Verdes Estates was the first to be developed/incorporated (1939), but is only about 13K people; Rancho Palos Verdes was the most recent to be incorporated (1973) but is the largest at 41K; Rolling Hills Estates (incorporated 1957) is only about 8K people, but is far and away the commercial center for the area; the simplest-named Rolling Hills (incorporated 1957) is the smallest (less than 2K) and is residential-only. FWIW people usually just refer to the whole area as "Palos Verdes" (or more locally, "the hill").

****

If accepting the concept of San Francisco/San Jose (i.e., the historically dominant city of a metro being passed in population) you may also consider these geographically closer pairs:
-Riverside being larger than San Bernardino (although they're probably equal now in terms of commercial importance)
-Anaheim being larger than Santa Ana (again, they're probably equal from a business standpoint; Santa Ana is the governmental center, while Anaheim is the tourism center)
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Avalanchez71 on February 04, 2022, 10:09:27 AM
New Tazewell is slightly larger than Tazewell, TN.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: mgk920 on February 04, 2022, 05:13:25 PM
Before the great Amalgamation of a few decades ago, the suburban City of North York, ON was more populous than the the adjacent City of Toronto, ON.

Mike
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: bing101 on February 05, 2022, 08:57:17 AM
Quezon City, Philippines is larger than Manila itself but is referred to as the Metro.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: TheGrassGuy on February 05, 2022, 04:21:12 PM
Might be an edge case, but...

New Territories population = 3.6M
Hong Kong Island population = 1.3M
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: skluth on February 05, 2022, 04:50:28 PM
Virginia Beach is larger than Norfolk and was once considered a minor suburb after Portsmouth, Hampton, and Newport News. It had under 10,000 population as recently as 1960 when Norfolk had over 300,000 people. The metro is now listed as the Virginia Beach—Norfolk—Newport News, VA—NC Metro area. The child passed the parent in population in the 1990 census so is now considered the parent. I don't know of any other metro areas that have gone through this transition.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Takumi on February 05, 2022, 08:42:19 PM
Quote from: skluth on February 05, 2022, 04:50:28 PM
Virginia Beach is larger than Norfolk and was once considered a minor suburb after Portsmouth, Hampton, and Newport News. It had under 10,000 population as recently as 1960 when Norfolk had over 300,000 people. The metro is now listed as the Virginia Beach–Norfolk–Newport News, VA–NC Metro area. The child passed the parent in population in the 1990 census so is now considered the parent. I don't know of any other metro areas that have gone through this transition.
Part of that is Virginia Beach consolidating with Princess Anne County in the 1960s, greatly increasing in physical size as well as population. Chesapeake, which is the former Norfolk County and is what I describe as “several smaller communities connected by mutual sprawl”, has also passed the city of Norfolk in size.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: jgb191 on February 06, 2022, 03:54:21 AM
Is Cleveland, Ohio larger city than Cleveland, Texas?  Also which is the largest Springfield:  the one in, Illinois, Missouri, Massachusettes, Ohio, or Oregon?
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Flint1979 on February 06, 2022, 09:15:07 AM
In Michigan, Saginaw Township is almost the same size as Saginaw (city). In fact it's bigger in area, about 26 square miles for Saginaw Township and 18 square miles for Saginaw (city). Not sure about 2020 but in 2010 Saginaw Township had 40,840 for a population while Saginaw had 51,508 in 2010 but had an estimate of 48,115. Saginaw Township hasn't really grown much but hasn't lost population while Saginaw (city) has lost half it's population over the last 60 years.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Max Rockatansky on February 06, 2022, 10:24:08 AM
Quote from: Flint1979 on February 06, 2022, 09:15:07 AM
In Michigan, Saginaw Township is almost the same size as Saginaw (city). In fact it's bigger in area, about 26 square miles for Saginaw Township and 18 square miles for Saginaw (city). Not sure about 2020 but in 2010 Saginaw Township had 40,840 for a population while Saginaw had 51,508 in 2010 but had an estimate of 48,115. Saginaw Township hasn't really grown much but hasn't lost population while Saginaw (city) has lost half it's population over the last 60 years.

That's actually really common for the Township to be larger than the namesake city I've found in Michigan.  Dewitt Township was (apparently still is) three times larger in population than the city of Dewitt.  I found that fact kind of vexing when I was going to high school.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: GaryV on February 06, 2022, 12:43:12 PM
Isn't Saginaw Township older than the City of Saginaw? Typically the townships are organized first, and only when the population gets to a certain point is a city chartered.

So which is really the child and which the parent?
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Flint1979 on February 07, 2022, 04:28:45 AM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on February 06, 2022, 10:24:08 AM
Quote from: Flint1979 on February 06, 2022, 09:15:07 AM
In Michigan, Saginaw Township is almost the same size as Saginaw (city). In fact it's bigger in area, about 26 square miles for Saginaw Township and 18 square miles for Saginaw (city). Not sure about 2020 but in 2010 Saginaw Township had 40,840 for a population while Saginaw had 51,508 in 2010 but had an estimate of 48,115. Saginaw Township hasn't really grown much but hasn't lost population while Saginaw (city) has lost half it's population over the last 60 years.

That's actually really common for the Township to be larger than the namesake city I've found in Michigan.  Dewitt Township was (apparently still is) three times larger in population than the city of Dewitt.  I found that fact kind of vexing when I was going to high school.
That's common for smaller cities in the state but one example is Flint Township having about 32,000 while Flint had about 102,000 in 2010, I don't see the 2020 numbers so I'm going by 2010. A city like Midland is an example of just the city having most of the population while the townships surrounding it are less populated.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: Flint1979 on February 07, 2022, 04:36:32 AM
Quote from: GaryV on February 06, 2022, 12:43:12 PM
Isn't Saginaw Township older than the City of Saginaw? Typically the townships are organized first, and only when the population gets to a certain point is a city chartered.

So which is really the child and which the parent?
Back when Saginaw Township was organized it was part of Oakland County and much bigger, it covered all of today's Saginaw County, part of Bay, Midland and Genesee counties. This was over 100 years ago and Saginaw Township didn't start becoming populated until the 1960's while Saginaw combined the east and west sides into a single city in 1889 well before Saginaw Township's current boundries became populated like they are today. Saginaw is indeed the parent city above Saginaw Township, Bay City and Midland.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: golden eagle on February 08, 2022, 10:04:27 AM
Before the merger, West Helena, AR, was bigger than Helena.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: tolbs17 on February 10, 2022, 11:20:04 AM
Some people consider Durham as a suburb of Raleigh. Durham was bigger in population in the 1950s, but it's not a child town (nor a suburb or Raleigh). Both cities are in their own counties and have their own districts and laws.
Title: Re: "Child" towns that are bigger/more major than "parent" towns
Post by: hotdogPi on February 10, 2022, 11:23:43 AM
Quote from: tolbs17 on February 10, 2022, 11:20:04 AM
Both cities are in their own counties and have their own districts and laws.

This has nothing to do with parent/child. This applies to St. Louis and East St. Louis, which is definitely a parent/child relationship despite being in different states. (Of course, it doesn't qualify for this thread.)