Today marks the opening of the Scott Miller Hill Bypass on US-33, a 4.3-mile realignment which is mostly in western Roane County, West Virginia. This project was first planned about 40 years ago, and WVDOH has called this project a "bypass" for at least 30 years. But the route bypasses no villages or other populated areas.
I am not familiar with any other named "bypasses" that do not bypass a town (typically to avoid reduced speed limits). In the eastern part of West Virginia (as in much of the Northeast), the term "Cutoff" is generally used. In some parts of North Carolina, the term "Shortcut" is also used. Looking for other modern-day cutoffs, shortcuts and bypasses that don't really bypass anything important.
Back when Otis Bowen was governor of Indiana, he pushed through a US 6 bypass of Bremen, a town of under 5,000 with all of two stoplights. I was an 8 year old living on US 6 in town when it became IN 106, thus my avatar.
The East Nicolaus, CA bypass along Route 70 in Sutter County (opened in the early 2010s) was designed mostly to avoid one intersection with a stop sign, though the area was developed enough that simply building on top of the old alignment would have been challenging:
https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9088043,-121.5486505,15.92z?entry=ttu
US-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
Quote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
When I-42 gets completed I'm sure the bypass shields will go.
Quote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
Nope. There's a traffic light there and a good Cook Out location at that intersection. Speaking from experience.
Quote from: Dirt Roads on July 18, 2024, 05:19:03 PMLooking for other modern-day cutoffs, shortcuts and bypasses that don't really bypass anything important.
The Gene Snyder Freeway (I-265/KY 841/IN 265).
Quote from: hbelkins on July 19, 2024, 10:47:34 AMQuote from: Dirt Roads on July 18, 2024, 05:19:03 PMLooking for other modern-day cutoffs, shortcuts and bypasses that don't really bypass anything important.
The Gene Snyder Freeway (I-265/KY 841/IN 265).
This is not a bypass. It is a loop. In the best of cases, these outer loops might make transition from one inbound freeway to a different outbound freeway shorter / more convenient, but all in all, they have more local utility than use for through traffic.
Quote from: Rothman on July 18, 2024, 08:48:23 PMQuote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
Nope. There's a traffic light there and a good Cook Out location at that intersection. Speaking from experience.
US 70 Bypass bypasses the Cook Out to the south, mainline US 70 goes through the traffic light.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Cook+Out/@35.5195986,-78.3050838,3752m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x89ac12ab4bd176bd:0x419cdc2be9d75da9!8m2!3d35.5221008!4d-78.2926742!16s%2Fg%2F11x9l4jdy?entry=ttu
Quote from: PColumbus73 on July 19, 2024, 11:52:27 AMQuote from: Rothman on July 18, 2024, 08:48:23 PMQuote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
Nope. There's a traffic light there and a good Cook Out location at that intersection. Speaking from experience.
US 70 Bypass bypasses the Cook Out to the south, mainline US 70 goes through the traffic light.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Cook+Out/@35.5195986,-78.3050838,3752m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x89ac12ab4bd176bd:0x419cdc2be9d75da9!8m2!3d35.5221008!4d-78.2926742!16s%2Fg%2F11x9l4jdy?entry=ttu
Thanks for the echo.
I personally don't consider a Cook Out to be something "special," but I guess if you really like their food....
Quote from: 1995hoo on July 19, 2024, 01:32:38 PMI personally don't consider a Cook Out to be something "special," but I guess if you really like their food....
Heh. Fair enough. Point is that the bypass does serve a purpose.
Quote from: Rothman on July 19, 2024, 01:53:56 PMQuote from: 1995hoo on July 19, 2024, 01:32:38 PMI personally don't consider a Cook Out to be something "special," but I guess if you really like their food....
Heh. Fair enough. Point is that the bypass does serve a purpose.
Yeah, I know why it's there. The cigar outlet is at that interchange as well. Back in the early 1990s there was a Nathan's a few doors down from the cigar outlet (by far the furthest-south Nathan's I ever remember encountering).
I was more focused on the final sentence in the original post: "Looking for other modern-day cutoffs, shortcuts[,] and bypasses that don't really bypass anything important." I viewed it mainly as the bypass serving to let people avoid a few traffic lights and businesses and so I didn't view it as anything all that "important," even though it's certainly "useful" for thru traffic.
I-215 and Old 215 (originally old US 395/TEMP I-15E) near Alessandro Boulevard in Moreno Valley.
The 215 realignment to the west (opened ca. 1994) seems to have been created for a railroad track in the area...that is no longer in use and has been removed, in favor of warehouses built since the newer freeway opened. Historicaerials shows the area around the old alignment being semi-rural in the 1980s.
https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9210153,-117.2862229,2752m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu
When TxDOT expanded US 380 to a 4-lane divided in Hunt County about 2 decades ago, they straightened a curve and bypassed the unincorporated community of Floyd, leaving a half-mile loop of Business 380. Only thing that was there was an elementary school and (I think) a church.
Yeah, but if we didn't build bypasses around nothing special, then how are the Vogons going to demolish Arthur Dent's house?
In New Orleans, though not signed a Bypass, US 90 mainline between the end points of US 90 Business bypasses nothing as the business route is expressway grade. In essence, US 90 Business is a better route than the mainline it loops around.
So what does mainline US 90 on Clairborn Avenue really bypass? ( Rhetorical question ) A freeway that's faster.
Quote from: Dirt Roads on July 18, 2024, 05:19:03 PMLooking for other modern-day cutoffs, shortcuts and bypasses that don't really bypass anything important.
Quote from: hbelkins on July 19, 2024, 10:47:34 AMThe Gene Snyder Freeway (I-265/KY 841/IN 265).
Quote from: bwana39 on July 19, 2024, 11:31:39 AMThis is not a bypass. It is a loop. <snipped>
Rickroll! Better check out
hbelkins' avatar.
Quote from: algorerhythms on July 19, 2024, 04:53:29 PMYeah, but if we didn't build bypasses around nothing special, then how are the Vogons going to demolish Arthur Dent's house?
Is that meant to be another reference to Future I-42 in North Carolina? :hmmm:
Quote from: algorerhythms on July 19, 2024, 04:53:29 PMYeah, but if we didn't build bypasses around nothing special, then how are the Vogons going to demolish Arthur Dent's house?
That was Mr. Prosser.
Quote from: Dirt Roads on July 19, 2024, 07:34:53 PMQuote from: Dirt Roads on July 18, 2024, 05:19:03 PMLooking for other modern-day cutoffs, shortcuts and bypasses that don't really bypass anything important.
Quote from: hbelkins on July 19, 2024, 10:47:34 AMThe Gene Snyder Freeway (I-265/KY 841/IN 265).
Quote from: bwana39 on July 19, 2024, 11:31:39 AMThis is not a bypass. It is a loop. <snipped>
Rickroll! Better check out hbelkins' avatar.
:rofl:
Seriously, how about the short four-lane section of US 52 between Kenova and Fort Gay? It bypasses Prichard, but Prichard is just a wide spot in the road.
Quote from: hbelkins on July 22, 2024, 03:57:51 PMQuote from: Dirt Roads on July 19, 2024, 07:34:53 PMQuote from: Dirt Roads on July 18, 2024, 05:19:03 PMLooking for other modern-day cutoffs, shortcuts and bypasses that don't really bypass anything important.
Quote from: hbelkins on July 19, 2024, 10:47:34 AMThe Gene Snyder Freeway (I-265/KY 841/IN 265).
Quote from: bwana39 on July 19, 2024, 11:31:39 AMThis is not a bypass. It is a loop. <snipped>
Rickroll! Better check out hbelkins' avatar.
:rofl:
Seriously, how about the short four-lane section of US 52 between Kenova and Fort Gay? It bypasses Prichard, but Prichard is just a wide spot in the road.
Heh. Reminds me of one time when my family was driving along KY 122. Locals have all sorts of names for little places out there that aren't marked. Upper Burton, Lower Burton, Jack's Creek, Mead Hill, etc. So, that one time, we were driving along, I think just on the north side of Mead Hill (old route before the new "bypass" was built) and my mother made the remark, "Eh, this wide spot in the road had a name, but I can't remember it now."
The new US-395 bypass around Olancha. Not exactly the most crowded place in the world, but the bypass has more to do with maintaining the expressway-like standards of 395.
About a decade ago, a bypass was built on US-101 around Willits. (And like the new one with 395, CA-20 was extended a little bit to junction with the new bypass). Willits is another community that isn't exactly New York in terms of traffic, but I guess the logic was having a freeway bypass was better for safety.
Quote from: Quillz on May 04, 2025, 09:35:20 PMThe new US-395 bypass around Olancha. Not exactly the most crowded place in the world, but the bypass has more to do with maintaining the expressway-like standards of 395.
About a decade ago, a bypass was built on US-101 around Willits. (And like the new one with 395, CA-20 was extended a little bit to junction with the new bypass). Willits is another community that isn't exactly New York in terms of traffic, but I guess the logic was having a freeway bypass was better for safety.
I think the Olancha/Cartago Bypass is the first time they've significantly rerouted US-395 in California since they bypassed Crowley Lake in 1970 (unless you count moving the road over 200 feet around Manzanar, which was silly and pointless). I'm not sure why they bothered with this major project, because it looked like there was room to widen the road to four lanes.
Willits had plenty of precedent. Most significant towns along US-101 have gotten bypassed over the years. I hate the fact that it's only two lanes, made stupidly expensive by being a viaduct for over a mile, and not having any intersections for its entire length. I'd rather drive through Willits.
For some reason CA 99 (formerly US 99) bypasses the site of Quail siding at Exit 73 north of Pixley. The former surface grade of US 99 in Quail was never removed and is very easy to access from the southbound off-ramp. Quail was dead as a place people lived even by the 1950s.
I nominate the two-year-old Mentone Bypass, a four-lane bypass of the town of 22. The bypass directs trucks around the town to the oil fields in the north.
(https://i.postimg.cc/90jh6sKY/mentone.png)
Kinda looks like the beginnings of a Cities: Skylines world.
US 195 skirts around Plaza (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.3164782,-117.3764799,4781m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D), a tiny spot in the Palouse with a handful of homes and many more cows. The interchange is probably a bit overkill.
Quote from: Bruce on May 04, 2025, 11:53:01 PMUS 195 skirts around Plaza (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.3164782,-117.3764799,4781m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D), a tiny spot in the Palouse with a handful of homes and many more cows. The interchange is probably a bit overkill.
What's up with this road stub?
https://www.google.com/maps/@47.3100494,-117.3886839,3a,36.7y,170.21h,87.4t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1surdur3-z-bBqK0KCFqJ7ug!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D2.6022741416608426%26panoid%3Durdur3-z-bBqK0KCFqJ7ug%26yaw%3D170.2148528556944!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Over here in Alabama, you have AL 201, which serves as a bypass/cutoff between US 29 and AL 93 for the tiny town of Banks:
https://www.google.com/maps/@31.8056863,-85.8266547,3800m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Quote from: freebrickproductions on May 05, 2025, 12:16:11 AMQuote from: Bruce on May 04, 2025, 11:53:01 PMUS 195 skirts around Plaza (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.3164782,-117.3764799,4781m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D), a tiny spot in the Palouse with a handful of homes and many more cows. The interchange is probably a bit overkill.
What's up with this road stub?
https://www.google.com/maps/@47.3100494,-117.3886839,3a,36.7y,170.21h,87.4t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1surdur3-z-bBqK0KCFqJ7ug!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D2.6022741416608426%26panoid%3Durdur3-z-bBqK0KCFqJ7ug%26yaw%3D170.2148528556944!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
The north half of the bypass was constructed first, so it rejoined the old alignment using that stub. Once the section south of Cheney Plaza Road was completed, it wasn't needed anymore.
Quote from: Bruce on May 05, 2025, 12:20:03 AMQuote from: freebrickproductions on May 05, 2025, 12:16:11 AMQuote from: Bruce on May 04, 2025, 11:53:01 PMUS 195 skirts around Plaza (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.3164782,-117.3764799,4781m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D), a tiny spot in the Palouse with a handful of homes and many more cows. The interchange is probably a bit overkill.
What's up with this road stub?
https://www.google.com/maps/@47.3100494,-117.3886839,3a,36.7y,170.21h,87.4t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1surdur3-z-bBqK0KCFqJ7ug!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D2.6022741416608426%26panoid%3Durdur3-z-bBqK0KCFqJ7ug%26yaw%3D170.2148528556944!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
The north half of the bypass was constructed first, so it rejoined the old alignment using that stub. Once the section south of Cheney Plaza Road was completed, it wasn't needed anymore.
Ah, that makes sense. Surprised it wasn't at least partially repurposed into a ramp.
Quote from: hbelkins on July 22, 2024, 03:57:51 PMis just a wide spot in the road
It's really a small town when a "wide spot in the road" isn't any wider.
Quote from: jlam on May 04, 2025, 11:40:32 PMKinda looks like the beginnings of a Cities: Skylines world.
It's missing the highway carriageways randomly turning into a pair of two-way two-lane roads.
Low-hanging fruit, but I-57 around Cairo. :bigass:
Ruins porn is always special.
How about a bypass of sand?
This one was needed due to coastal erosion.
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6146374,-75.4662982,3810m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6146374,-75.4662982,3810m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQzMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D)
NC 42 around Wilson, NC is nothing special, but to make Ward Blvd part of the state road system. It's shorter to drive through Wilson.
Quote from: jlam on May 04, 2025, 11:40:32 PMI nominate the two-year-old Mentone Bypass, a four-lane bypass of the town of 22. The bypass directs trucks around the town to the oil fields in the north.
(https://i.postimg.cc/90jh6sKY/mentone.png)
Kinda looks like the beginnings of a Cities: Skylines world.
Thread over, you win.
I'm surprised there hadn't been jokes about the Mentone Bypass on this forum.
Quote from: formulanone on May 05, 2025, 04:25:30 PMQuote from: jlam on May 04, 2025, 11:40:32 PMI nominate the two-year-old Mentone Bypass, a four-lane bypass of the town of 22. The bypass directs trucks around the town to the oil fields in the north.
(https://i.postimg.cc/90jh6sKY/mentone.png)
Kinda looks like the beginnings of a Cities: Skylines world.
Thread over, you win.
I'm surprised there hadn't been jokes about the Mentone Bypass on this forum.
Now THAT is overbuilding to a comical extreme. Of course, Mentone IS an important...ish...place, as it's the largest population center and county seat of Loving County with its immense population of 64 (why does this county even exist?).
Quote from: WillWeaverRVA on May 06, 2025, 09:29:31 AMQuote from: formulanone on May 05, 2025, 04:25:30 PMQuote from: jlam on May 04, 2025, 11:40:32 PMI nominate the two-year-old Mentone Bypass, a four-lane bypass of the town of 22. The bypass directs trucks around the town to the oil fields in the north.
(https://i.postimg.cc/90jh6sKY/mentone.png)
Kinda looks like the beginnings of a Cities: Skylines world.
Thread over, you win.
I'm surprised there hadn't been jokes about the Mentone Bypass on this forum.
Now THAT is overbuilding to a comical extreme. Of course, Mentone IS an important...ish...place, as it's the largest population center and county seat of Loving County with its immense population of 64 (why does this county even exist?).
Rest assured that a Texas politician will designate a future I-20N corridor to ensure such an important town is connected to the interstate system.
Makes me wonder if turning radii or other maneuvering concerns led to that.
Quote from: roadman65 on May 05, 2025, 03:27:01 PMNC 42 around Wilson, NC is nothing special, but to make Ward Blvd part of the state road system. It's shorter to drive through Wilson.
At least North Carolina has built bypasses over the years. Delaware could and should have built them for Newark, Middletown, and Dover when they had the chance. Now each has a piece of one, and it's too late to do anything more.
Quote from: elsmere241 on May 06, 2025, 02:01:41 PMQuote from: roadman65 on May 05, 2025, 03:27:01 PMNC 42 around Wilson, NC is nothing special, but to make Ward Blvd part of the state road system. It's shorter to drive through Wilson.
At least North Carolina has built bypasses over the years. Delaware could and should have built them for Newark, Middletown, and Dover when they had the chance. Now each has a piece of one, and it's too late to do anything more.
What about the US 301 Freeway?
Quote from: roadman65 on May 06, 2025, 03:10:11 PMQuote from: elsmere241 on May 06, 2025, 02:01:41 PMQuote from: roadman65 on May 05, 2025, 03:27:01 PMNC 42 around Wilson, NC is nothing special, but to make Ward Blvd part of the state road system. It's shorter to drive through Wilson.
At least North Carolina has built bypasses over the years. Delaware could and should have built them for Newark, Middletown, and Dover when they had the chance. Now each has a piece of one, and it's too late to do anything more.
What about the US 301 Freeway?
I meant full-loop bypasses. They could have been built when each place started to grow . . .
Quote from: elsmere241 on May 06, 2025, 06:14:40 PMQuote from: roadman65 on May 06, 2025, 03:10:11 PMQuote from: elsmere241 on May 06, 2025, 02:01:41 PMQuote from: roadman65 on May 05, 2025, 03:27:01 PMNC 42 around Wilson, NC is nothing special, but to make Ward Blvd part of the state road system. It's shorter to drive through Wilson.
At least North Carolina has built bypasses over the years. Delaware could and should have built them for Newark, Middletown, and Dover when they had the chance. Now each has a piece of one, and it's too late to do anything more.
What about the US 301 Freeway?
I meant full-loop bypasses. They could have been built when each place started to grow . . .
Well talking about a state dead against E-W full highways. IMO DE 404 should be a four lane expressway with a full limited access bypass around Georgetown. However they won't build or upgrade east West routes. This coming from someone I know knowing DelDots aspirations.
I never saw anything "special" about Encino, Texas bypassed by US-281 (eventually-to-be I-69C). Same goes for Pierce and Hungerford, Texas bypassed by US-59 (eventually-to-be I-69).
The Cross Keys Bypass is a county bypass of the small Cross Keys section of Washington Twp, Gloucester County NJ. But its main purpose was to bypass a 6-way intersection that was becoming increasingly congested. It created several 4 way intersections, and all function normally. https://maps.app.goo.gl/Ay8cYmfLKEq9nQAK6
Quote from: WillWeaverRVA on May 06, 2025, 09:29:31 AMQuote from: formulanone on May 05, 2025, 04:25:30 PMQuote from: jlam on May 04, 2025, 11:40:32 PMI nominate the two-year-old Mentone Bypass, a four-lane bypass of the town of 22. The bypass directs trucks around the town to the oil fields in the north.
(https://i.postimg.cc/90jh6sKY/mentone.png)
Kinda looks like the beginnings of a Cities: Skylines world.
Thread over, you win.
I'm surprised there hadn't been jokes about the Mentone Bypass on this forum.
Now THAT is overbuilding to a comical extreme. Of course, Mentone IS an important...ish...place, as it's the largest population center and county seat of Loving County with its immense population of 64 (why does this county even exist?).
The history was county seats had to be reachable within a day so farmers could vote but still have harvest time. Thus why Texas has 254 counties, and most are small.
As the country expanded west, the railroads made it easier to reach county seats.
Westerly, RI has the RI Route 78 Super Two that may bypass the city, but the road itself is more of a local street now since the freeway's intended purpose is no longer.
So in essence traveling on US 1 or RI Route 3 it's best to stay on them through Downtown as that bypass don't help through traffic.
Quote from: roadman65 on August 10, 2025, 03:16:14 PMWesterly, RI has the RI Route 78 Super Two that may bypass the city, but the road itself is more of a local street now since the freeway's intended purpose is no longer.
So in essence traveling on US 1 or RI Route 3 it's best to stay on them through Downtown as that bypass don't help through traffic.
Wut. Through traffic doesn't take US 1...
https://maps.app.goo.gl/F3MasuytZDwCA47i7
Was the original purpose of 78 to provide a bypass for thru traffic on US-1, meaning it was once planned to continue southwest and rejoin US-1? Or was its purpose exactly what exists now, providing a bypass for thru traffic between I-95 and RI US-1? The latter seems more likely to me.
Quote from: pderocco on August 10, 2025, 06:01:50 PMWas the original purpose of 78 to provide a bypass for thru traffic on US-1, meaning it was once planned to continue southwest and rejoin US-1? Or was its purpose exactly what exists now, providing a bypass for thru traffic between I-95 and RI US-1? The latter seems more likely to me.
The latter.
Quote from: TheStranger on July 19, 2024, 03:33:26 PMI-215 and Old 215 (originally old US 395/TEMP I-15E) near Alessandro Boulevard in Moreno Valley.
The 215 realignment to the west (opened ca. 1994) seems to have been created for a railroad track in the area...that is no longer in use and has been removed, in favor of warehouses built since the newer freeway opened. Historicaerials shows the area around the old alignment being semi-rural in the 1980s.
https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9210153,-117.2862229,2752m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu
It appears that the portion of US 395 (that portion which later became I-215) from SR 60 to Cactus Avenue paralleled tracks and had numerous at-grade intersections that would have proven difficult to upgrade without relocating the tracks or providing some off-set interchanges, similar to what's being done along US 33 in Ohio: https://maps.app.goo.gl/NcA3qX6rWyJWkA6R9 (https://maps.app.goo.gl/NcA3qX6rWyJWkA6R9)
Those tracks are still active, it seems.
Quote from: jlam on May 04, 2025, 11:40:32 PMI nominate the two-year-old Mentone Bypass, a four-lane bypass of the town of 22. The bypass directs trucks around the town to the oil fields in the north.
(https://i.postimg.cc/90jh6sKY/mentone.png)
Kinda looks like the beginnings of a Cities: Skylines world.
My favorite part of this "bypass" is the fact it is 4 lanes. Must get quite the traffic counts.
I would call that a relocation, not a bypass.
An example is the 6.8 mile US-460 Poole Siding Relocation in Dinwiddie County, VA. No towns are bypassed.
As part of the program to upgrade US-460 to a 4-lane divided highway, this was built because the original highway crossed the parallel Norfolk and Western Railroad twice with bridges, and the relocated highway stayed south of the railroad without crossing it. These were very old narrow 2-lane underpasses and rest of the segment was 2 lanes and with substandard alignment.
Quote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
I-5 and CASR-14 in Southern California as well as I-580 in Northern California have Truck Bypasses in order to avoid trucks ending up on the left side of the freeway where they aren't allowed to be.
Quote from: michravera on August 15, 2025, 05:27:04 PMQuote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
I-5 and CASR-14 in Southern California as well as I-580 in Northern California have Truck Bypasses in order to avoid trucks ending up on the left side of the freeway where they aren't allowed to be.
That's a common thing, but they're not usually "bypasses", or even "truck routes", just truck lanes. (See the I-5/I-210 and I-5/I-405 interchanges just south, or the I-5/CA-99 interchange further north.) But the I-5/CA-14 interchange is more complicated, as the truck lanes and main lanes have different connections to surface roads. TravelMapping treats the I-5 truck lanes as a separate road, I guess due to its connection to Sierra Hwy, but even that doesn't describe all the details.
Further south, the I-5/I-805 interchange is two interleaved interchanges, where the main lanes to/from the south provide access to Carmel Valley Rd, while the signed "Local Bypass" lanes provide access to CA-56. To/from the north, neither have a direct connection to CA-56. Yet TravelMapping doesn't show a separate I-5 bypass.
Quote from: Beltway on August 10, 2025, 10:36:24 PMI would call that a relocation, not a bypass.
I mean, that's your right. But it's name includes "bypass", and it is signed as such.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/DeqUVEqYLADRrHg48
https://maps.app.goo.gl/pnJRz4sC3DkwwMUk8
Quote from: sprjus4 on August 10, 2025, 10:04:31 PMMy favorite part of this "bypass" is the fact it is 4 lanes. Must get quite the traffic counts.
Did you look at TX-302 northeast of town? It's been upgraded to 2+1 lanes all the way to Kermit and beyond.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/rjwFQCJtsEvc6pVy5
And CH-300 itself is four lanes as well.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/RBb6JZcxZCmTgxvb6
The 2024 AADT count just northeast of Mentone was almost 10,000—more than twice the 2019 count. Just from 2020 to 2021, there was a 50% increase in AADT at that station.
Quote from: pderocco on August 15, 2025, 06:29:59 PMQuote from: michravera on August 15, 2025, 05:27:04 PMQuote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
I-5 and CASR-14 in Southern California as well as I-580 in Northern California have Truck Bypasses in order to avoid trucks ending up on the left side of the freeway where they aren't allowed to be.
That's a common thing, but they're not usually "bypasses", or even "truck routes", just truck lanes. (See the I-5/I-210 and I-5/I-405 interchanges just south, or the I-5/CA-99 interchange further north.) But the I-5/CA-14 interchange is more complicated, as the truck lanes and main lanes have different connections to surface roads. TravelMapping treats the I-5 truck lanes as a separate road, I guess due to its connection to Sierra Hwy, but even that doesn't describe all the details.
Further south, the I-5/I-805 interchange is two interleaved interchanges, where the main lanes to/from the south provide access to Carmel Valley Rd, while the signed "Local Bypass" lanes provide access to CA-56. To/from the north, neither have a direct connection to CA-56. Yet TravelMapping doesn't show a separate I-5 bypass.
I guess that the instruction "TRUCKS MUST USE BYPASS" doesn't make them a "bypass" bypass but a "'bypass that isn't really a bypass bypass'" bypass.
Quote from: michravera on August 16, 2025, 05:44:43 PMQuote from: pderocco on August 15, 2025, 06:29:59 PMQuote from: michravera on August 15, 2025, 05:27:04 PMQuote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
I-5 and CASR-14 in Southern California as well as I-580 in Northern California have Truck Bypasses in order to avoid trucks ending up on the left side of the freeway where they aren't allowed to be.
That's a common thing, but they're not usually "bypasses", or even "truck routes", just truck lanes. (See the I-5/I-210 and I-5/I-405 interchanges just south, or the I-5/CA-99 interchange further north.) But the I-5/CA-14 interchange is more complicated, as the truck lanes and main lanes have different connections to surface roads. TravelMapping treats the I-5 truck lanes as a separate road, I guess due to its connection to Sierra Hwy, but even that doesn't describe all the details.
Further south, the I-5/I-805 interchange is two interleaved interchanges, where the main lanes to/from the south provide access to Carmel Valley Rd, while the signed "Local Bypass" lanes provide access to CA-56. To/from the north, neither have a direct connection to CA-56. Yet TravelMapping doesn't show a separate I-5 bypass.
I guess that the instruction "TRUCKS MUST USE BYPASS" doesn't make them a "bypass" bypass but a "'bypass that isn't really a bypass bypass'" bypass.
I guess that makes it a good example for this thread, because it's not really bypassing anything special.
That said, I often drove those truck lanes during the day, because the main line of I-5 often suffered a traffic jam approaching the top, so I was bypassing that.
My personal favorite (which I drove earlier this week) is probably the US 277 Dundee bypass (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7411162,-98.902391,3039m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDgxMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) in northern Texas.
In the 70s, WisDOT decided that WIS 13 needed to bypass Ogema (https://maps.app.goo.gl/UJsD4pxEZpekfdis6). WIS 13 is still a rural two-lane highway in that area, and Ogema is unincorporated with a population of 188.
Quote from: CoreySamson on August 16, 2025, 07:18:04 PMMy personal favorite (which I drove earlier this week) is probably the US 277 Dundee bypass (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7411162,-98.902391,3039m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDgxMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) in northern Texas.
Reminds me of Floyd TX a little further east on US 380 between McKinney and Greenville. Your bypass is much closer
Quote from: CoreySamson on August 16, 2025, 07:18:04 PMMy personal favorite (which I drove earlier this week) is probably the US 277 Dundee bypass (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7411162,-98.902391,3039m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDgxMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) in northern Texas.
It's not really a bypass. It's just the new alignment of the mainline highway, with the old roadway being designated the business route.
Quote from: kphoger on August 16, 2025, 09:36:23 PMQuote from: CoreySamson on August 16, 2025, 07:18:04 PMMy personal favorite (which I drove earlier this week) is probably the US 277 Dundee bypass (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7411162,-98.902391,3039m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDgxMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) in northern Texas.
It's not really a bypass. It's just the new alignment of the mainline highway, with the old roadway being designated the business route.
OP:
Quote from: Dirt Roads on July 18, 2024, 05:19:03 PMToday marks the opening of the Scott Miller Hill Bypass on US-33, a 4.3-mile realignment which is mostly in western Roane County, West Virginia. This project was first planned about 40 years ago, and WVDOH has called this project a "bypass" for at least 30 years. But the route bypasses no villages or other populated areas.
Quote from: sprjus4 on August 16, 2025, 10:04:38 PMQuote from: kphoger on August 16, 2025, 09:36:23 PMQuote from: CoreySamson on August 16, 2025, 07:18:04 PMMy personal favorite (which I drove earlier this week) is probably the US 277 Dundee bypass (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7411162,-98.902391,3039m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDgxMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) in northern Texas.
It's not really a bypass. It's just the new alignment of the mainline highway, with the old roadway being designated the business route.
OP:
Quote from: Dirt Roads on July 18, 2024, 05:19:03 PMToday marks the opening of the Scott Miller Hill Bypass on US-33, a 4.3-mile realignment which is mostly in western Roane County, West Virginia. This project was first planned about 40 years ago, and WVDOH has called this project a "bypass" for at least 30 years. But the route bypasses no villages or other populated areas.
It took me about ten minutes to sleuth out what that original post referred to. A Google Maps link would have been nice. It's just another of the tens of thousands of road realignments that have happened over the years. I can see the planners referring to it as a bypass, but it's not signed as one, and the old alignment, a winding, slower road, only retained its street name, not a route designation. So it's not surprising that this thread gravitated toward examples of actual signed bypasses where the original road retained its designation, but seemed pointless. In Corey's example, small as Dundee is, it's not nothing.
Quote from: TheCatalyst31 on August 16, 2025, 09:02:26 PMIn the 70s, WisDOT decided that WIS 13 needed to bypass Ogema (https://maps.app.goo.gl/UJsD4pxEZpekfdis6). WIS 13 is still a rural two-lane highway in that area, and Ogema is unincorporated with a population of 188.
Also in Wisconsin, WisDOT basically bypassed a gas station at Hatley, just east of Wausau. They built the four lane WI 29 around it, complete with an interchange. The effect is especially stark going eastbound at night.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/yL7eAtMHvyKRU3aZ9
Mike
Quote from: pderocco on August 16, 2025, 06:45:16 PMQuote from: michravera on August 16, 2025, 05:44:43 PMQuote from: pderocco on August 15, 2025, 06:29:59 PMQuote from: michravera on August 15, 2025, 05:27:04 PMQuote from: 1995hoo on July 18, 2024, 08:19:43 PMUS-70 Bypass near Selma, North Carolina, comes to mind because it's not a bypass of the designated business route and rather serves as a bypass of an interchange.
I-5 and CASR-14 in Southern California as well as I-580 in Northern California have Truck Bypasses in order to avoid trucks ending up on the left side of the freeway where they aren't allowed to be.
That's a common thing, but they're not usually "bypasses", or even "truck routes", just truck lanes. (See the I-5/I-210 and I-5/I-405 interchanges just south, or the I-5/CA-99 interchange further north.) But the I-5/CA-14 interchange is more complicated, as the truck lanes and main lanes have different connections to surface roads. TravelMapping treats the I-5 truck lanes as a separate road, I guess due to its connection to Sierra Hwy, but even that doesn't describe all the details.
Further south, the I-5/I-805 interchange is two interleaved interchanges, where the main lanes to/from the south provide access to Carmel Valley Rd, while the signed "Local Bypass" lanes provide access to CA-56. To/from the north, neither have a direct connection to CA-56. Yet TravelMapping doesn't show a separate I-5 bypass.
I guess that the instruction "TRUCKS MUST USE BYPASS" doesn't make them a "bypass" bypass but a "'bypass that isn't really a bypass bypass'" bypass.
I guess that makes it a good example for this thread, because it's not really bypassing anything special.
That said, I often drove those truck lanes during the day, because the main line of I-5 often suffered a traffic jam approaching the top, so I was bypassing that.
On SB I-5, it's very much easier to exit at Laval Rd, if you take the truck bypass. Since trucks need to show up in the right two lanes, when your goal is to end up in the right lane, it seems right to take the road built precisely for that!
Quote from: bassoon1986 on August 16, 2025, 09:14:18 PMQuote from: CoreySamson on August 16, 2025, 07:18:04 PMMy personal favorite (which I drove earlier this week) is probably the US 277 Dundee bypass (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7411162,-98.902391,3039m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDgxMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) in northern Texas.
Reminds me of Floyd TX a little further east on US 380 between McKinney and Greenville. Your bypass is much closer
I mentioned this one on the first page. I get that the highway was 4-laned around it, but it seemed silly for TxDOT to keep it in the state system at all, much less as a Business highway.
The US-277 bypass in Dundee was one of the last projects completed of the 4-lane upgrade project from Wichita Falls to Abilene. IMHO the overall project remains unfinished. Anson doesn't have a bypass. And then there is the gap between the Holiday bypass and West end of Kell Freeway in Wichita Falls.
I think the original 2-lane route thru Dundee is still in the system as a state-maintained business route because there is hardly any local tax base; the county would have to assume the maintenance burden if the state took the road off its books.
Quote from: Rothman on August 10, 2025, 06:34:15 PMQuote from: pderocco on August 10, 2025, 06:01:50 PMWas the original purpose of 78 to provide a bypass for thru traffic on US-1, meaning it was once planned to continue southwest and rejoin US-1? Or was its purpose exactly what exists now, providing a bypass for thru traffic between I-95 and RI US-1? The latter seems more likely to me.
The latter.
Once upon a time, CT 78 was proposed to meet I-95 where the wide median is, east of exit 91.
(https://www.kurumi.com/roads/ct/pics/plan-78st.jpg)
https://www.kurumi.com/roads/ct/ct78.html
The part shown in RI as dashed line for the then-proposed Westerly Bypass is the only part that actually ended up being built!
Camp 9 Bypass near Vallecito, CA caught my eye. It saves maybe a quarter mile of travel for traffic on Camp 9 Road heading onto northbound Vallecito Road.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/nXrBQbb44p2mKMvX8?g_st=ipc
Quote from: PurdueBill on August 24, 2025, 10:18:34 PMQuote from: Rothman on August 10, 2025, 06:34:15 PMQuote from: pderocco on August 10, 2025, 06:01:50 PMWas the original purpose of 78 to provide a bypass for thru traffic on US-1, meaning it was once planned to continue southwest and rejoin US-1? Or was its purpose exactly what exists now, providing a bypass for thru traffic between I-95 and RI US-1? The latter seems more likely to me.
The latter.
Once upon a time, CT 78 was proposed to meet I-95 where the wide median is, east of exit 91.
(https://www.kurumi.com/roads/ct/pics/plan-78st.jpg)
https://www.kurumi.com/roads/ct/ct78.html
The part shown in RI as dashed line for the then-proposed Westerly Bypass is the only part that actually ended up being built!
Why such a giant interchange with the bit going just one road over? A simple trumpet would have been fine, and maybe it would have actually been built if it wasn't so over-designed.
Quote from: vdeane on August 25, 2025, 09:28:59 AMQuote from: PurdueBill on August 24, 2025, 10:18:34 PMQuote from: Rothman on August 10, 2025, 06:34:15 PMQuote from: pderocco on August 10, 2025, 06:01:50 PMWas the original purpose of 78 to provide a bypass for thru traffic on US-1, meaning it was once planned to continue southwest and rejoin US-1? Or was its purpose exactly what exists now, providing a bypass for thru traffic between I-95 and RI US-1? The latter seems more likely to me.
The latter.
Once upon a time, CT 78 was proposed to meet I-95 where the wide median is, east of exit 91.
(https://www.kurumi.com/roads/ct/pics/plan-78st.jpg)
https://www.kurumi.com/roads/ct/ct78.html
The part shown in RI as dashed line for the then-proposed Westerly Bypass is the only part that actually ended up being built!
Why such a giant interchange with the bit going just one road over? A simple trumpet would have been fine, and maybe it would have actually been built if it wasn't so over-designed.
1970 in CT was a crazy time. They still thought 11 was going to be completed and a Hartford-Providence Interstate built.
strongly suspect that the (tribe) would have been very much in favor of that all the way out to CT 2 at I-395 in Norwich had some timing related things played out a little bit differently.
Mike
It's a bypass (libramiento) around something, but pan left and check out the great pavement.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/FuYCLL4hA6wcUJ4c9?g_st=ac
Got get past a little dirt to get to the good stuff. Not sure what that good stuff is since I'm not seeing an industrial park along the bypass route.
Quote from: NE2 on August 26, 2025, 03:39:28 AMIt's a bypass (libramiento) around something, but pan left and check out the great pavement.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/FuYCLL4hA6wcUJ4c9?g_st=ac
If you look at
the previous GSV (https://maps.app.goo.gl/CEPEzSrcv9BxrpSC6), then you can see that the pavement is there (deteriorating), but just covered in blowing dirt.
Here's from the other direction (https://maps.app.goo.gl/1d6wjh8sAX2c5qyv7).
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on August 26, 2025, 07:52:46 AMI'm not seeing an industrial park along the bypass route.
Yeah, me either. If I were the highway department, I wouldn't bother repaving it either.
Burlington WI population just 10,000 has a bypass. Never understood why it was built. Not much traffic would take Hwy 36 through it and continue on to the Lake Geneva area. Usually Milwaukee traffic going to Lake Geneva takes I-43.
Quote from: dvferyance on August 31, 2025, 06:55:06 PMBurlington WI population just 10,000 has a bypass. Never understood why it was built. Not much traffic would take Hwy 36 through it and continue on to the Lake Geneva area. Usually Milwaukee traffic going to Lake Geneva takes I-43.
It's useful if you're going from Racine to Lake Geneva, or Kenosha or Racine to Elkhorn (or even cities beyond that). I've taken it a couple times going from Madison to the Kenosha area when I didn't feel like taking I-94.