AARoads Forum

Non-Road Boards => Off-Topic => Topic started by: golden eagle on September 08, 2011, 12:16:08 AM

Title: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: golden eagle on September 08, 2011, 12:16:08 AM
There are several communities in the Jackson metro area that don't have a downtown. Madison, Byram and Flowood currently don't have one, but are in the works to develop one for their communities. Ridgeland also doesn't have a downtown and I've heard of no plans to develop one.

Maybe it's the purist in me, but I don't consider a city to be a real city unless it has a downtown. I've seen towns of less than 1,000 people have some sort of downtown area. I'm sure that many metro areas have suburbs that don't have a downtown either. What do you think?
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: NE2 on September 08, 2011, 12:17:45 AM
Bay Lake, Florida.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: jdb1234 on September 08, 2011, 12:31:53 AM
Hoover, Alabama
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: DTComposer on September 08, 2011, 02:32:21 AM
Many of the "master-planned" communities in California lack a downtown, opting instead for clusters of "lifestyle centers" or similar types of developments. Several of these communities have well over 100,000 people, including Irvine and Santa Clarita.

Quote from: golden eagle on September 08, 2011, 12:16:08 AM
Madison, Byram and Flowood currently don't have one, but are in the works to develop one for their communities.

I'm curious to hear examples of downtowns that were developed after the fact such as these, and their level of success in creating a true community center for their cities.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: huskeroadgeek on September 08, 2011, 03:55:33 AM
You will find that most post-WW II suburbs do not have downtowns or central business districts. This is because cities like this developed primarily as residential cities, or bedroom communities. Older cities that have become suburbs or exurbs of larger cities will often have a downtown, but it is usually much smaller than you would expect for a city of that size.
Otherwise, just about every city or town regardless of size has some kind of downtown or central business district. Even in the tiniest of towns, even if there really aren't operating business anymore, you can tell where the business district used to be.

In regards to the planned communities mentioned above, another example of this is Columbia, MD. It is a collection of 10 villages each with its own village center and no traditional downtown.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: agentsteel53 on September 08, 2011, 11:22:40 AM
Quote from: DTComposer on September 08, 2011, 02:32:21 AM
Many of the "master-planned" communities in California lack a downtown, opting instead for clusters of "lifestyle centers" or similar types of developments. Several of these communities have well over 100,000 people, including Irvine and Santa Clarita.

Irvine has to be the most terribly planned city I've ever been in.  It is next to impossible to find a gas station, or even a convenience store.  The one time I badly needed some water, I drove around horrific walled-in neighborhoods for a while before accidentally stumbling upon a Vons (a major supermarket). 

to this day, I know when I am driving I-5, not to attempt to run out of gas between Dana Point (where there's a gas station visible from the freeway) and the 42.

Orange County is, otherwise, a nightmare of large corporate buildings.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: Bryant5493 on September 08, 2011, 12:58:53 PM
Riverdale, Georgia didn't have a "real" downtown; they're developing one now in the Riverdale Town Center complex.

http://www.riverdaletowncenter.com/

Be well,

Bryant
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: formulanone on September 08, 2011, 01:16:41 PM
Quote from: NE2 on September 08, 2011, 12:17:45 AM
Bay Lake, Florida.

Bay Lake has about 20 residents and 200,000 guests; perhaps Downtown Disney qualifies.

Coral Springs, Florida has over 100,000 residents and no downtown, but it was founded in 1963 and master-planned since then. Any non-residential building over 35 years old has probably been torn down by now.  :-/
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: texaskdog on September 08, 2011, 01:20:18 PM
If there weren't downtowns most cities wouldn't have traffic issues
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: 1995hoo on September 08, 2011, 04:40:25 PM
Some people claim that Charlotte has an "uptown" rather than a "downtown."
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: mtantillo on September 08, 2011, 07:16:57 PM
Virginia Beach, Virginia.  Closest you get is the area near Virginia Beach Boulevard and Independence, where there are a couple of tall buildings.  The Oceanfront is definitely not a downtown district, its a touristy beach/ocean strip.  But since the Oceanfront is where most visitors are headed, it is generally what is referred to on mileage signs and guide signs.  Signed as "Oceanfront" and not "Downtown". 
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: mtantillo on September 08, 2011, 07:19:37 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on September 08, 2011, 04:40:25 PM
Some people claim that Charlotte has an "uptown" rather than a "downtown."

Well, "Downtown NYC" is called Midtown.  Downtown Manhattan is a small cousin to Midtown's CBD.  Likewise, Philly has a "Center City", Chicago has a "Loop", etc.  But they are all effectively (non-proper noun) downtowns. 

Because "DOWNTOWN" on a road sign refers to a generic downtown and not a neighborhood called "Downtown", signs on I-277 in Charlotte refer to "Charlotte DOWNTOWN" to guide visitors to Uptown Charlotte. 
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: xcellntbuy on September 08, 2011, 07:47:23 PM
Quote from: formulanone on September 08, 2011, 01:16:41 PM
Coral Springs, Florida has over 100,000 residents and no downtown, but it was founded in 1963 and master-planned since then. Any non-residential building over 35 years old has probably been torn down by now.  :-/
The commercial heart of Coral Springs, a downtown, if you will, stretches along North University Drive from West Atlantic Blvd. to West Sample Road, continuing west along Sample Road to Coral Springs Drive.

Fixed quote tag.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: yanksfan6129 on September 09, 2011, 12:54:26 AM
Quote from: mtantillo on September 08, 2011, 07:19:37 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on September 08, 2011, 04:40:25 PM
Some people claim that Charlotte has an "uptown" rather than a "downtown."

Well, "Downtown NYC" is called Midtown.  Downtown Manhattan is a small cousin to Midtown's CBD.  Likewise, Philly has a "Center City", Chicago has a "Loop", etc.  But they are all effectively (non-proper noun) downtowns. 

Because "DOWNTOWN" on a road sign refers to a generic downtown and not a neighborhood called "Downtown", signs on I-277 in Charlotte refer to "Charlotte DOWNTOWN" to guide visitors to Uptown Charlotte. 

I'm sorry, but downtown Manhattan is downtown...midtown is not downtown, even if midtown is the larger business district.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: NE2 on September 09, 2011, 03:04:00 AM
Quote from: formulanone on September 08, 2011, 01:16:41 PM
Quote from: NE2 on September 08, 2011, 12:17:45 AM
Bay Lake, Florida.

Bay Lake has about 20 residents and 200,000 guests; perhaps Downtown Disney qualifies.
Nope; that's in Lake Buena Vista, which I didn't mention.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: bassoon1986 on September 09, 2011, 11:44:52 AM
Bossier City, LA, but it's probably bc it's downplayed to Shreveport.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: 1995hoo on September 09, 2011, 03:48:19 PM
Quote from: mtantillo on September 08, 2011, 07:19:37 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on September 08, 2011, 04:40:25 PM
Some people claim that Charlotte has an "uptown" rather than a "downtown."

Well, "Downtown NYC" is called Midtown.  Downtown Manhattan is a small cousin to Midtown's CBD.  Likewise, Philly has a "Center City", Chicago has a "Loop", etc.  But they are all effectively (non-proper noun) downtowns. 

Because "DOWNTOWN" on a road sign refers to a generic downtown and not a neighborhood called "Downtown", signs on I-277 in Charlotte refer to "Charlotte DOWNTOWN" to guide visitors to Uptown Charlotte. 

I didn't think this thread was necessarily in the context of road signs, especially since this is the "Off-Topic" board. I certainly remember North Carolina's use of "DOWNTOWN" in all caps, though.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: SteveG1988 on September 09, 2011, 04:50:39 PM
Columbus NJ, town has a gas station near a fleamarket a mile outside of the main town. Nothing really in town except houses, a pub, one resturant, and a shoe repair place.

Emerado ND...across US2 from a USAF base, it had a Dominos, subway, and two gas stations along with a grain silo...15 mi to town
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: Landshark on September 09, 2011, 07:07:42 PM
The downtown for both Lacey and Tumwater, Washington is downtown Olympia.  Historic downtown Tumwater was wiped out when I-5 was built and Lacey never really had one.  The three cities should consolidate. 

Richland and Kennewick, two of the Tri-Cities in Washington really don't have downtowns either.  The center of activity is in between the two cities in the Columbia Center area.  Pasco has a downtown, but it has far less activity than the Columbia Center area.  If the Tri-Cities ever gets high rise buildings, I'd expect they would be built there.  Closing the minor airport being squeezed out by development will open up even more land in the area.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: corco on September 10, 2011, 12:13:53 AM
QuoteClosing the minor airport being squeezed out by development will open up even more land in the area.

Yeah, I'm sure ConAgra/Lambweston is going to allow that to happen! Vista Field is crucial for flying executives in and out since it's right next door to the LW headquarters- they've got multiple Learjets going in and out every day (or at least they used to) to Boise, Omaha, and the factories
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: tdindy88 on September 10, 2011, 12:23:48 AM
Quote from: yanksfan6129 on September 09, 2011, 12:54:26 AM
Quote from: mtantillo on September 08, 2011, 07:19:37 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on September 08, 2011, 04:40:25 PM
Some people claim that Charlotte has an "uptown" rather than a "downtown."

Well, "Downtown NYC" is called Midtown.  Downtown Manhattan is a small cousin to Midtown's CBD.  Likewise, Philly has a "Center City", Chicago has a "Loop", etc.  But they are all effectively (non-proper noun) downtowns.  

Because "DOWNTOWN" on a road sign refers to a generic downtown and not a neighborhood called "Downtown", signs on I-277 in Charlotte refer to "Charlotte DOWNTOWN" to guide visitors to Uptown Charlotte.  


I'm sorry, but downtown Manhattan is downtown...midtown is not downtown, even if midtown is the larger business district.

Not only that...but Downtown Manhattan is "the" downtown, the original. It is the reason that all other CBDs in the United States are even called Downtown.

Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: yanksfan6129 on September 10, 2011, 09:36:28 AM
Quote from: tdindy88 on September 10, 2011, 12:23:48 AM
Quote from: yanksfan6129 on September 09, 2011, 12:54:26 AM
Quote from: mtantillo on September 08, 2011, 07:19:37 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on September 08, 2011, 04:40:25 PM
Some people claim that Charlotte has an "uptown" rather than a "downtown."

Well, "Downtown NYC" is called Midtown.  Downtown Manhattan is a small cousin to Midtown's CBD.  Likewise, Philly has a "Center City", Chicago has a "Loop", etc.  But they are all effectively (non-proper noun) downtowns. 

Because "DOWNTOWN" on a road sign refers to a generic downtown and not a neighborhood called "Downtown", signs on I-277 in Charlotte refer to "Charlotte DOWNTOWN" to guide visitors to Uptown Charlotte. 


I'm sorry, but downtown Manhattan is downtown...midtown is not downtown, even if midtown is the larger business district.

Not only that...but Downtown Manhattan is "the" downtown, the original. It is the reason that all other CBDs in the United States are even called Downtown.



True that...Downtown Manhattan is where New York was founded, hell it was one of the first colonized places in all of the western hemisphere. Look, you can't say that just because an area has more workers, that it is automatically the downtown of a city. It is a/the central business district, no doubt, but lower Manhattan is downtown New York.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: florida on September 12, 2011, 06:07:37 AM
Deltona, FL. One big neighborhood.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: DeaconG on September 12, 2011, 10:51:27 AM
Quote from: florida on September 12, 2011, 06:07:37 AM
Deltona, FL. One big neighborhood.

Add Palm Bay to that mix.  Nice General Development Corp sprawl, it is!
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: english si on September 12, 2011, 01:40:12 PM
Quote from: yanksfan6129 on September 10, 2011, 09:36:28 AMTrue that...Downtown Manhattan is where New York was founded, hell it was one of the first colonized places in all of the western hemisphere.
Ahem, Verulamium (http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=st+albans&hl=en&ll=51.751623,-0.353494&spn=0.007532,0.021136&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=14.745606,43.286133&vpsrc=6&t=h&z=16) beats it by about 1500 years - colonised by the Romans! Not that it wins - the Celts were colonists before then and the Romans reached modern-day France, Spain and Morroco before hand.

If you take 'western hemisphere' to mean the Americas, rather than anything west of Greenwich (as those to the west of Atlantic tend to do), then you also have Greenland (and from there Labrador) in about 1000AD. If you mean the USA, then yes, you are pretty much right.

Isn't downtown Manhattan the origin of the term 'downtown'?
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: TheStranger on September 12, 2011, 01:55:02 PM
Does Danville, California have a downtown at all?  I'm honestly not sure.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: yanksfan6129 on September 12, 2011, 04:17:15 PM
Quote from: english si on September 12, 2011, 01:40:12 PM
Quote from: yanksfan6129 on September 10, 2011, 09:36:28 AMTrue that...Downtown Manhattan is where New York was founded, hell it was one of the first colonized places in all of the western hemisphere.
Ahem, Verulamium (http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=st+albans&hl=en&ll=51.751623,-0.353494&spn=0.007532,0.021136&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=14.745606,43.286133&vpsrc=6&t=h&z=16) beats it by about 1500 years - colonised by the Romans! Not that it wins - the Celts were colonists before then and the Romans reached modern-day France, Spain and Morroco before hand.

If you take 'western hemisphere' to mean the Americas, rather than anything west of Greenwich (as those to the west of Atlantic tend to do), then you also have Greenland (and from there Labrador) in about 1000AD. If you mean the USA, then yes, you are pretty much right.

Isn't downtown Manhattan the origin of the term 'downtown'?

I'm looking at it from the "American" perspective, meaning the New World rather than anything west of the prime meridian. Also, jeebus for the exact scrutiny of that statement - I even used the qualifier "one of"
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: english si on September 12, 2011, 07:03:48 PM
Saying 'all of the Western Hemisphere' and then excluding the Old World portion of it is rather insulting to those who live in the excluded place - use the term New World, or Americas: it's not only more accurate, but shorter! The 'all of' bit makes it a lot worse.

Perhaps the diss I gave your statement and NYC is making you feel a bit like I felt when you dissed 80% of my country, including everywhere I've lived by ignoring it's existence.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: yanksfan6129 on September 12, 2011, 09:41:47 PM
I did not diss your country at all...I resent that sentiment. It's not like I want to preclude the UK from being part of the western hemisphere...in this case it was a simple oversight on my part. I'm sorry that when I think of the western hemisphere I think of the Americas...yes it's wrong I know that but it's not like I have any ill will toward western Europe. Hell I always talk about being more like Europe.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: jwolfer on September 13, 2011, 01:27:54 PM
Quote from: english si on September 12, 2011, 07:03:48 PM
Saying 'all of the Western Hemisphere' and then excluding the Old World portion of it is rather insulting to those who live in the excluded place - use the term New World, or Americas: it's not only more accurate, but shorter! The 'all of' bit makes it a lot worse.

Perhaps the diss I gave your statement and NYC is making you feel a bit like I felt when you dissed 80% of my country, including everywhere I've lived by ignoring it's existence.

Get the wad out of your panties
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: agentsteel53 on September 13, 2011, 02:00:01 PM
Quote from: english si on September 12, 2011, 07:03:48 PM
Saying 'all of the Western Hemisphere' and then excluding the Old World portion of it is rather insulting to those who live in the excluded place - use the term New World, or Americas: it's not only more accurate, but shorter! The 'all of' bit makes it a lot worse.

hey, who decided to put the 0 meridian right down the middle of their country?  had you any common sense, you'd have put it somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean.  preferably between westernmost Africa and easternmost Brazil, but I do not know what the state of geographic knowledge of the world was at the time the Greenwich routing was decided.

at least, as a matter of coincidence, the international date line goes through a fairly sparsely inhabited segment of the planet.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: golden eagle on September 13, 2011, 11:19:29 PM
To get back on topic...

Quote from: DTComposer on September 08, 2011, 02:32:21 AMI'm curious to hear examples of downtowns that were developed after the fact such as these, and their level of success in creating a true community center for their cities.

I'm curious about that too. Since the communities near me have yet to see that realized, I can't tell. I know downtowns just didn't pop up out of thin air, but my guess would be that newly created downtowns wouldn't have the authenticity that existing downtowns do.

Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: yanksfan6129 on September 14, 2011, 12:55:14 AM
My town, which is a suburb of NYC, is mainly residential: it lacks a downtown. It has a few strip malls. However, in terms of developing a downtown after the fact, the township is has been attempting for years to develop a small section of US 202 right next to our train station into a small downtown-like area, but they have been unsuccessful. There are a few stores there, but it's definitely not an authentic downtown.

A nearby town called got it right...they even have fewer people than my hometown, but near their train station they have a cute little downtown...and it is little, but it has a few nice stores and restaurants.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: english si on September 14, 2011, 07:14:36 AM
Quote from: agentsteel53 on September 13, 2011, 02:00:01 PMat least, as a matter of coincidence, the international date line goes through a fairly sparsely inhabited segment of the planet.
Reliant on two things - the non-straight nature of the line (bypassing all land and following country boundaries), and - more importantly - the location of 0 being in the right place. You talk about having the line in the middle of the Atlantic, which would put 180 through the middle of Japan, Indonesia, Australia or somewhere like that - far worse. -1, 0, 1 is a lot easier to deal with than -179, 180, 179, so you would really want the 180 point to be in the middle of an ocean (which happened more by luck than judgement, though it was known, pretty much, where the land was when the meridian was set)

The zero point was also seen a badge of honour - look at the fight the French put up to have Paris as the zero point. Likewise all those world maps (French and German ones less noticably different than American, Russian, Chinese, etc) that put their country in the middle, even if it means chopping large landmasses in half.

All I'm suggesting that the term "all of the Western Hemisphere" should mean that, and not just the New World. It's perhaps a little pedantic to you guys (though that barely warrants the level of comments I got back - the comments seem to have much more to do with me showing that the 'centre of the universe' wasn't as special as people were claiming at the wrong time of year), but it's home to me.

Back to the main topic, Telford's town centre is simply a shopping mall - which for us Brits doesn't count as a town centre. The original villages that were turned into the new town all have their own historic centres, and the new bits all have their little planned centres.

In fact, I find it hard to think of British towns that don't have a focal point where much of the commercial stuff is. Town centres might be dying in the UK, thanks to supermarkets, but they still exist. Even suburbs in cities have them, normally as they were villages that got eaten up by the growth of the city. Perhaps some of the 60s New Towns, but even then, a lot of them were expansions/mergers of existing places and/or had a centre planned in.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: MDOTFanFB on September 30, 2011, 07:56:44 PM
Taylor, Riverview and Woodhaven, MI all have no downtown. Southgate, MI also has no downtown, but there have been plans earlier this year to develop a downtown along Eureka Road.

And Michigan also spells "DOWNTOWN" in all caps on their BGSes.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: Crazy Volvo Guy on September 30, 2011, 08:01:26 PM
Muscle Shoals, AL.

"Downtown" is the stretch between the city hall and the police department on Avalon Ave.

That's a bunch of stripmalls.

edit:// http://g.co/maps/95mg5 - there ya go folks, "downtown" Muscle Shoals in all its glory.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: golden eagle on October 01, 2011, 12:49:30 AM
Does Washington, DC have a true downtown? I've heard of a Downtown Washington, but I never see pictures of high rises.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: Brandon on October 01, 2011, 06:35:27 AM
Quote from: golden eagle on October 01, 2011, 12:49:30 AM
Does Washington, DC have a true downtown? I've heard of a Downtown Washington, but I never see pictures of high rises.

Yes.  It's the Mall area with the Capitol and the White House.  IIRC, DC has an ordinance against building taller than the Capitol (or is it the Washington Monument)?
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: formulanone on October 01, 2011, 10:07:32 AM
I recall a tour guide mentioning that no building may be taller than the Capitol Building. The Washington Monument was erected before that law was enacted, so it was exempt. Then again, it was a tour guide...reality or details never get in the way of a good story.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: NE2 on October 01, 2011, 02:05:35 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heights_of_Buildings_Act_of_1910
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: empirestate on October 01, 2011, 06:25:04 PM
So far I've been unable to locate Chesapeake, VA's on a map.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: NE2 on October 01, 2011, 07:47:53 PM
Quote from: empirestate on October 01, 2011, 06:25:04 PM
So far I've been unable to locate Chesapeake, VA's on a map.
Since it was formed by merging South Norfolk with Norfolk County, I'd assume downtown would be the original South Norfolk.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: OCGuy81 on October 05, 2011, 10:32:30 PM
QuoteOrange County is, otherwise, a nightmare of large corporate buildings.

You got us there! That's for sure! 

First time I had some friends visiting from Seattle, they flew into John Wayne Airport and saw the group of buildings thinking it's downtown Irvine.

"Not really, just office buildings" I replied.

Most people here refer to downtown as LA.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: tchafe1978 on October 05, 2011, 10:59:20 PM
My original hometown of Brookfield, WI doesn't really have a downtown. It does however have what the city likes to call the "Old Village" which is where the train depot used to be. Now that area is just a collection of older buildings and a few businesses, I don't think it really qulafies as a downtown. The city does have a couple large commercial areas, namely the whole stretch of Bluemound Rd (US 18) within the city.

My adopted hometown of Belmont, WI is so small it really can't have a downtown. Downtown would be called bar street.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: OCGuy81 on October 05, 2011, 11:03:16 PM
QuoteDowntown would be called bar street.

Gotta love Wisconsin! I love the number of taverns the smaller towns have there.  And all of them have great food and good beer!
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: mhallack on October 12, 2011, 08:18:19 AM
My old hometown if Simi Valley, Ca. All surburbia. If there is a square inch of land open anywhere, they would build a housing tract or mini-mall on it, even if it wasn't needed.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: empirestate on October 12, 2011, 11:50:02 AM
Quote from: NE2 on October 01, 2011, 07:47:53 PM
Quote from: empirestate on October 01, 2011, 06:25:04 PM
So far I've been unable to locate Chesapeake, VA's on a map.
Since it was formed by merging South Norfolk with Norfolk County, I'd assume downtown would be the original South Norfolk.
Makes sense...

On a nearby, semi-related note, I just got back from Virginia Beach, where I was staying in the Town Center area, which is really just a shopping/entertainment/luxury residential kind of development. Now I know VA Beach has a proper downtown over towards the ocean, and I also know that places similar to Town Center are rampant all over the country, but in this case I've actually seen Town Center labeled as the CBD of Virginia Beach, rather than the historical center near the ocean. Is this a false assumption on the mapmaker's part, or is the city actually trying to position Town Center that way? (I believe the tallest building in the city is there, for example.)
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: roadman65 on October 26, 2011, 08:28:26 PM
Elizabeth and Jersey City in New Jersey both have Downtowns, but not like we know them as.  Elizabeth uses Midtown to call its main business district on Broad Street and Jersey City calls it Journal Square.  The riverfront areas in both cities are the areas they call Downtown in both cases east of the Turnpike.

To me a Downtown is a business district and not a section of town. I will call it that because that is how I see it.

Also, Linden, NJ refers to its downtown area as the Linden Shopping Center as if it were a strip mall.
Title: Re: Municipalities without a downtown
Post by: HazMatt on October 27, 2011, 08:58:48 AM
Quote from: 1995hoo on September 08, 2011, 04:40:25 PM
Some people claim that Charlotte has an "uptown" rather than a "downtown."

We do (or did) that in Lenoir, NC as well.  They completely revamped everything recently and are pushing the Downtown label now, but we've always called it Uptown.  They've also rerouted NC 90 to bypass the area and truncated US 321-A south of town for some reason.