AARoads Forum

Regional Boards => Central States => Topic started by: rte66man on November 06, 2011, 04:54:36 PM

Title: Unusual I35 BGS
Post by: rte66man on November 06, 2011, 04:54:36 PM
Took a trip from OKC to Dallas recently and came across the following BGS on I35:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rte66man/6320028426/

I've never seen "JCT" listed after the shield. There are 2 BGS's in each direction. ALl have the shield, then "JCT".  Is this normal in other parts of the country?

rte66man
Title: Re: Unusual I35 BGS
Post by: J N Winkler on November 06, 2011, 05:02:10 PM
Nope.  "JCT" should not be there because it does not add anything to the meaning of the sign.  It's a flaky design specific to this contract (and yes, "JCT" was on the construction plans--this was a recent job).
Title: Re: Unusual I35 BGS
Post by: Scott5114 on November 10, 2011, 05:28:39 PM
JCT flakiness is somewhat endemic to Oklahoma. In addition to unnecessary JCTs on freeways (of course you're JCTing that highway, an exit is a JCT by definition), there's also several instances of JCT'ing roads you're already following due to concurrencies, or a combination of JCT signage and advance turn signs, leading to the bizarre suggestion that you must turn before you can get to the junction.
Title: Re: Unusual I35 BGS
Post by: The High Plains Traveler on November 11, 2011, 11:26:57 PM
Reminds me of the signage on L.A. freeways in the late 1960s that intersected I-605 - the first freeway not known primarily by its name. I guess San Gabriel River Freeway was too long for the signage so it was posted "Junction [I-605] Freeway". I think this was the impetus to evolve to the current California standard of referring to a freeway by "the" plus its number.