AARoads Forum

User Content => Photos, Videos, and More => Topic started by: cpzilliacus on March 30, 2013, 09:59:44 PM

Title: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: cpzilliacus on March 30, 2013, 09:59:44 PM
Entrance from Md. 182 (Layhill Road) to eastbound Md. 200 (ICC).  Note the DelDOT-style light poles, the "phony tree" cell phone tower and the brick National Capital Trolley Museum building adjacent:

(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toward.com%2Fcpz%2FDSC01744Web.jpg&hash=dc824474927098037faab936044bee81720755f8)

60 MPH is better than 55 MPH:

(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toward.com%2Fcpz%2FDSC01746Web.jpg&hash=e873e9c47e410883b7f117eeb7751212b3040ddb)
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: roadman65 on March 31, 2013, 10:44:32 AM
I was noticing that MD 200 is ALL open road tolling! It will be interesting to see what existing toll facility will go that way exclusively as we all know this is the current wave for all new toll roads.
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: cpzilliacus on March 31, 2013, 11:56:07 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on March 31, 2013, 10:44:32 AM
I was noticing that MD 200 is ALL open road tolling! It will be interesting to see what existing toll facility will go that way exclusively as we all know this is the current wave for all new toll roads.

Yes, it's all cashless open-road tolling. The first one of its kind in Maryland.  Virginia's I-495 HOV/toll lanes, which opened late last year, operate the same way, as does North Carolina's Triangle Expressway.

The Pennsylvania Turnpike is on-record saying that that's where they are going in the not-so-distant future.
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: roadman65 on March 31, 2013, 05:01:46 PM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on March 31, 2013, 11:56:07 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on March 31, 2013, 10:44:32 AM
I was noticing that MD 200 is ALL open road tolling! It will be interesting to see what existing toll facility will go that way exclusively as we all know this is the current wave for all new toll roads.

Yes, it's all cashless open-road tolling. The first one of its kind in Maryland.  Virginia's I-495 HOV/toll lanes, which opened late last year, operate the same way, as does North Carolina's Triangle Expressway.

The Pennsylvania Turnpike is on-record saying that that's where they are going in the not-so-distant future.
Here in Florida we have the Lee Roy Salmon Expressway that was regular tolling to open road exclusively in the past few years. 

I do remember the Port Authority of NY & NJ saying they wanted to especially for the GWB.
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: NE2 on March 31, 2013, 05:03:09 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on March 31, 2013, 05:01:46 PM
Lee Roy Salmon Expressway
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi50.tinypic.com%2F214b3uu.png&hash=59d23341b32959e921abe4ceeb37c09de51a204c)
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: roadman65 on March 31, 2013, 05:09:20 PM
Quote from: NE2 on March 31, 2013, 05:03:09 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on March 31, 2013, 05:01:46 PM
Lee Roy Salmon Expressway
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi50.tinypic.com%2F214b3uu.png&hash=59d23341b32959e921abe4ceeb37c09de51a204c)
This expressway should be in the Guiness Book as it has had so many names, so many shields, and sometimes it goes by it designated FDOT route number FL 618.

I believe it had three known shields.  It started out as the South Tampa Crosstown, then it was the Tampa Crosstown, and then alternatively it was called back and forth as either FL 618 or the Lee Roy Salmon and now the Lee Roy dropped. 

Some of it maybe not official in legislation, but by locals it seemed to have many changes in names.  Maybe we should just call it the undershort freeway, cause something about it changes every so often just as the average Joe changing his shorts.
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: NE2 on March 31, 2013, 07:51:53 PM
Whoosh. His name is fucking Selmon. With an E. Nothing fishy here.
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: seicer on March 31, 2013, 09:19:50 PM
What's with all the wood posts? I wondered about that on my trip to NYC this past week - are they as crash worthy as standard steel supports?
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: cpzilliacus on April 01, 2013, 12:45:47 AM
Quote from: Sherman Cahal on March 31, 2013, 09:19:50 PM
What's with all the wood posts? I wondered about that on my trip to NYC this past week - are they as crash worthy as standard steel supports?

Maryland SHA standard is wood posts for reassurance markers and speed limit signs and most other smallish signs.   

Not sure if they are MdTA standard or not (since SHA managed the construction of the highway, not MdTA).
Title: Re: Two images of Md. 200 (with 60 MPH limit)
Post by: hbelkins on April 01, 2013, 11:01:23 AM
Michigan and Ohio use a lot of wood posts. In most cases, if you look closely at the bottom of the post, on the side parallel to the roadway, you'll see a circular hole bored all the way through (I don't have any photos). This, to my non-engineer eyes, provides a breakaway characteristic similar to what's found on steel support posts.