19
112
99
238
400
69
Quote from: bugo on April 09, 2013, 01:30:27 PM
99
238
400
69
US-99 fits a grid, and the various state 99s are just renumberings of it.
I-238 is mildly meaningful as it is a renumber of CA-238.
US-400 is indeed pretty meaningless.
US-69 and I-69 fit a grid. well, kinda, in the case of the hyperextended I-69.
VA 598, 90003, 90004, and 90005.
FAS 8799 (Illinois)
Anything numbered 42.
Quote from: kphoger on April 09, 2013, 03:25:43 PM
FAS 8799 (Illinois)
Anything numbered 42.
How about former 42A?
66
WA 19: Not long enough to be a primary route and WA 20 has to share its child routes with US 2.
WA 181: Shouldn't even exist, no longer connects to its parent route.
US 310 in Montana. Pretty meaningless. Same thing with US 191. They each do not connect with 10 and 91 since they're somewhere else. US 10 ends in Fargo, US 91 is dang near extinction.
I am surprised nobody brought up I-99 with the way it violates the numbering grid and passed into law by congress.
I would say 182 in New Jersey as it should be a continuation of NJ 57.
Quote from: roadman65 on April 09, 2013, 10:06:20 PM
I am surprised nobody brought up I-99 with the way it violates the numbering grid and passed into law by congress.
It's
assinine, not necessarily meaningless.
Quote from: Brandon on April 09, 2013, 10:12:59 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on April 09, 2013, 10:06:20 PM
I am surprised nobody brought up I-99 with the way it violates the numbering grid and passed into law by congress.
It's assinine, not necessarily meaningless.
Asinine, not assinine. You
assumed how it would be spelled.
Also, this is a stupid thread.