Hopefully this can stay tied up in court until someone comes forward with cash and the intention of preserving or even better, reopening it. A bridge that was not closed due to structural issues should not be demolished.
The problem is...it has issues now due to the fact that it has not had maintence in decades. To restore it would require more money than the bridge is worth to people, since it doesn't actually connect to anything any more, and to do so would require a lot of work
It would be interesting to see how much work it needs, especially when it was in pristine condition when it closed. (For instance, salt was
never used on its surface.) But I'm stumped as to how you'd connect the west end to the streets that are there now - that's why it closed in the first place, because the current OH 7 disrupted its path. It could be preserved as a landmark, maybe, but restoring vehicle traffic would take more than it's worth.