AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules for political content in signatures and user profiles. See this thread for details.

Poll

Your Vote on the renumbering

Yea
- 7 (29.2%)
Nay
- 17 (70.8%)

Total Members Voted: 24

Voting closed: April 08, 2019, 03:51:50 PM


Author Topic: AARoads Bill 2: An Act to Renumber Interstate 29 as Interstate 31  (Read 304 times)

X99

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 240
  • Location: South Dakota
  • Last Login: Today at 06:54:13 PM

This vote is binding. You cannot change your vote after confirming an option.

You can also propose amendments to this bill.

Quote
WHEREAS, there are plans to extend Interstate 27 along the United States Highway 287 corridor from Amarillo, TX to Denver, CO;

WHEREAS, there are plans to create a new north-south freeway in the Great Plains;

WHEREAS, the original planned designation for Interstate 29 between Fargo, ND and the US-Canada border was to be Interstate 31, with no highway between Sioux Falls, SD and Fargo, ND;

NOW THEREFORE, Interstate 29 shall be renumbered to Interstate 31. This renumbering will cover all of Interstate 29, between Kansas City, MO and the US-Canada border.

All Interstate signage along the route will be updated, with priority at interchanges with other Interstates.

This bill does not preclude an extension or rerouting of the current route.

This bill shall be effective immediately.
Logged

TEG24601

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 695
  • Age: 35
  • Location: Whidbey Island, WA
  • Last Login: Today at 05:30:00 PM
    • Tegianzone
Re: AARoads Bill 2: An Act to Renumber Interstate 29 as Interstate 31
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2019, 06:17:28 PM »

I-29 should be I-35.
Logged
They said take a left at the fork in the road.  I didn't think they literally meant a fork, until plain as day, there was a fork sticking out of the road at a junction.

X99

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 240
  • Location: South Dakota
  • Last Login: Today at 06:54:13 PM
Re: AARoads Bill 2: An Act to Renumber Interstate 29 as Interstate 31
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2019, 10:02:50 PM »

I-29 should be I-35.
Then what would you do with the current I-35? A northern extension of I-37 with an extremely long concurrency?
Logged

US71

  • Road Scholar , Master of Snark
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 8497
  • Sign Inspector

  • Age: 59
  • Location: On the road again
  • Last Login: May 25, 2019, 08:52:53 PM
    • The Road Less Taken
Re: AARoads Bill 2: An Act to Renumber Interstate 29 as Interstate 31
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2019, 11:34:37 PM »

I-29 should be I-35.

49 should be 29
Logged
a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -- Simon & Garfunkel

X99

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 240
  • Location: South Dakota
  • Last Login: Today at 06:54:13 PM
Re: AARoads Bill 2: An Act to Renumber Interstate 29 as Interstate 31
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2019, 10:07:54 AM »

I-29 should be I-35.

49 should be 29
I once heard that 29 should be 49, to confuse the roadgeeks.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.