AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules for political content in signatures and user profiles. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: AASHTO spring 2009 highway renumbering requests online  (Read 4859 times)

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3687
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: Today at 05:11:02 PM
AASHTO spring 2009 highway renumbering requests online
« on: April 10, 2009, 05:45:53 PM »

AASHTO's Standing Committee on Highways has posted the states' proposed Interstate/U.S. Route numbering changes for their spring meeting.  The applications can be viewed here.

Nevada has 6 applications, which is the most for this meeting.  Unusual, cause that honor typically falls to one of the eastern states.

All of NDOT's applications are related to the Carson City Bypass project and US 50/395.  NDOT is expecting to open another 1.3 miles of the freeway this summer (phase 2A), and will be moving US 50/395 to the new extension.  However, the final leg of the freeway (phase 2B) is mostly unfunded at this point, so a temporary designation is being sought for both highways.  NDOT is also seeking business routes of 50 and 395 along the current mainline alignments.
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

leifvanderwall

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 397
  • Last Login: May 01, 2012, 08:35:30 PM
Re: AASHTO spring 2009 highway renumbering requests online
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2009, 06:04:36 PM »

I noticed the I-295 elimination in the DC Area and a proposed I-695 extension on the list. That's where my I-97 should be. Leif V.
Logged

Michael

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 951
  • Age: 29
  • Location: Auburn, NY
  • Last Login: May 25, 2019, 07:31:37 PM
Re: AASHTO spring 2009 highway renumbering requests online
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2009, 07:58:08 PM »

Where's the elimination of I-99?  :) :) :)
Logged

74/171FAN

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1571
  • Age: 27
  • Location: Harrisburg, PA
  • Last Login: Today at 07:01:51 AM
Re: AASHTO spring 2009 highway renumbering requests online
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2009, 08:02:57 PM »

Quote
Where's the elimination of I-99?     
Or I-238???? :nod: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
Logged
I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

brad2971

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 162
  • Native Roadgeeking Son of the Great Plains

  • Age: 48
  • Location: Denver, CO
  • Last Login: Today at 10:24:55 AM
Re: AASHTO spring 2009 highway renumbering requests online
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2009, 11:34:47 PM »

CDOT made a little boo-boo in its application to reroute US85/US87 onto I-25: If you look carefully at the map CDOT provided, you'll notice a spot, south of downtown Colorado Springs, where the current US85/US87 crosses over I-25 to go east of the freeway. That particular spot (the spot where CDOT asks that US85/US87 go onto I-25) does not have any onramps/offramps. This would mean that US85/87 would be left hanging :banghead:

We'll see whether or not AASHTO catches CDOT's little error  :pan:
Logged

mapman

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 182
  • Age: 42
  • Location: Gilroy, California
  • Last Login: May 18, 2019, 06:29:35 PM
Re: AASHTO spring 2009 highway renumbering requests online
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2009, 12:57:51 AM »

Anyone know why Caltrans has yet to petition for converting CA 210 into I-210?
Logged

ComputerGuy

Re: AASHTO spring 2009 highway renumbering requests online
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2009, 11:09:51 AM »

Nothing new for WA...I see some old 2006 proposals..US 197 US 101 ALT and US 12..
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.