Roadsign deemed "Offensive" and removed

Started by mass_citizen, August 25, 2014, 08:59:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

mass_citizen

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/vermont-diner-takes-bacon-sign-offends-muslim-residents-article-1.1915158

Perhaps if the woman simply noted that the sign wasn't MUTCD compliant it wouldn't have set off such a backlash?   :bigass:


Zeffy

That sign is not offensive in any manner whatsoever. Give me a break...
Life would be boring if we didn't take an offramp every once in a while

A weird combination of a weather geek, roadgeek, car enthusiast and furry mixed with many anxiety related disorders

Molandfreak

Yeah. Like everyone on a diet is offended by the dunkin donuts down their street. What the fuck?
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 05, 2023, 08:24:57 PMAASHTO attributes 28.5% of highway inventory shrink to bad road fan social media posts.

dgolub

Quote from: Zeffy on August 25, 2014, 09:04:28 PM
That sign is not offensive in any manner whatsoever. Give me a break...

Seriously?  I've heard that there's a restaurant in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn, an area with a very large Orthodox Jewish population, called Tref that has a pig as its logo.  Apparently, no one's complaining about that one.

A more legitimate complaint is whether or not a restaurant should be putting up what looks like a traffic sign...

froggie

You can argue whether or not the sign was offensive (personally I don't think so).  But legally speaking, it's close enough to looking like a standard road sign.  Which, in Vermont, is illegal to place within view of the traveling public.  That topic got mentioned on another thread.

roadman65

 I think the sign is cute.  Not offensive though, but I have seen worse.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

jeffandnicole

There is nothing wrong with the sign.  If there's something in the road that is going to result in it becoming bacon someday, you bet I don't want to hit it!

agentsteel53

I am offended by this person taking offense, and demand that she be removed from the public.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Henry

Another example of society gone horribly wrong...
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

Road Hog

Take down a bacon sign to make one person happy, and offend thousands of bacon lovers. Figures.

Another step toward sharia?  :poke:

roadman65

We had a similar issue here in Florida.  An icon was removed from the City of St. Cloud because it offended a person who did not even live in St. Cloud, but just happened to pass through it on US 192.  The people of St. Cloud, which is plenty of them, had to witness it be removed just to please one out of town person.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

OCGuy81

What's next?  People who are color blind demanding all green signs get removed?  Sorry California, you need to re-color all your state highway markers....

roadman

The only thing offensive I find about that sign is the fact it is advertising a private business on public property.
"And ninety-five is the route you were on.  It was not the speed limit sign."  - Jim Croce (from Speedball Tucker)

"My life has been a tapestry
Of years of roads and highway signs" (with apologies to Carole King and Tom Rush)

ET21

The local weatherman, trust me I can be 99.9% right!
"Show where you're going, without forgetting where you're from"

Clinched:
IL: I-88, I-180, I-190, I-290, I-294, I-355, IL-390
IN: I-80, I-94
SD: I-190
WI: I-90
MI: I-94, I-196
MN: I-90

hotdogPi

This "Speed Limit 20" sign is offensive; I want it removed.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

mass_citizen

Quote from: roadman on August 26, 2014, 10:45:44 AM
The only thing offensive I find about that sign is the fact it is advertising a private business on public property.

It appears the sign still served a purpose as the business' facebook post indicates that people had previously been driving over the plantings on that island. It is almost like a case of "adopt an island" where many businesses do in fact place signs with their name in areas they maintain.

hm insulators

Egad. That dame should move to the Middle East, put on a burqa (however you spell that) and crawl under a rock. :angry:
Remember: If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.

I'd rather be a child of the road than a son of a ditch.


At what age do you tell a highway that it's been adopted?

roadman

Quote from: mass_citizen on August 26, 2014, 12:59:59 PM
Quote from: roadman on August 26, 2014, 10:45:44 AM
The only thing offensive I find about that sign is the fact it is advertising a private business on public property.

It appears the sign still served a purpose as the business' facebook post indicates that people had previously been driving over the plantings on that island. It is almost like a case of "adopt an island" where many businesses do in fact place signs with their name in areas they maintain.
Point taken.  However, I personally am sick and tired of creating even more excuses for the marketing types to shill their products and services on the public, no matter how large or small the company may be.  And if people have been runningo ver the planters, then perhaps the planters shouldn't be there in the first place.
"And ninety-five is the route you were on.  It was not the speed limit sign."  - Jim Croce (from Speedball Tucker)

"My life has been a tapestry
Of years of roads and highway signs" (with apologies to Carole King and Tom Rush)

shadyjay

Quote from: mass_citizen on August 26, 2014, 12:59:59 PM
Quote from: roadman on August 26, 2014, 10:45:44 AM
The only thing offensive I find about that sign is the fact it is advertising a private business on public property.

It appears the sign still served a purpose as the business' facebook post indicates that people had previously been driving over the plantings on that island. It is almost like a case of "adopt an island" where many businesses do in fact place signs with their name in areas they maintain.

Then there was this back in April, when the entire planting area got hammered:

http://www.wptz.com/news/vermont-new-york/burlington/traffic-circle-crash-caused-by-medical-emergency/25434758#!bKJavX

Alex4897

Seriously.  There's war and strife worldwide but we have to get pissy about a novelty sign depicting bacon?

Grow.
Up.
👉😎👉

ilvny

I find the sign funny.  What I don't like is how the restaurant took the sign and their Facebook page down all because one person complained.

Duke87

What erodes my faith in humanity is not so much that someone complained, but rather that the sign owner bent over and let the complaining busybody have her way without even the slightest resistance. Listen folks, the first amendment gives you certain rights, and if you're not offending anyone, you're not exercising them properly! :pan:

On the other hand, I do have to agree that the sign should not have been there for an entirely different reason: it is advertising in a public right of way. The sign should be put back up on the owner's own property.
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

jeffandnicole

Honestly, I blame the media.  If one person complains, it should be a simple complaint with the police, or the store owner, or whatever.  Instead, the media picks up the issue and acts like the offending person is the worst idiot ever to roam the earth.  Cut the media out of it, and the sole offended person doesn't have much else to get their message out with (other than Facebook and such, but I'm sure there aren't too many people looking for "Yield to Bacon" type pages).


Molandfreak

#23
Quote from: jeffandnicole on August 26, 2014, 10:56:16 PM
Honestly, I blame the media.  If one person complains, it should be a simple complaint with the police, or the store owner, or whatever.  Instead, the media picks up the issue and acts like the offending person is the worst idiot ever to roam the earth.  Cut the media out of it, and the sole offended person doesn't have much else to get their message out with (other than Facebook and such, but I'm sure there aren't too many people looking for "Yield to Bacon" type pages).
What? Are you freaking kidding me? The world deserves to know how much of a butthurt, arrogant, uptight prick this woman is. In fact, I wish the media would have released her full name so we could publicly shame her. :evilgrin: There was nothing offensive about that sign! NOTHING. No one should have gotten offended.
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 05, 2023, 08:24:57 PMAASHTO attributes 28.5% of highway inventory shrink to bad road fan social media posts.

bandit957

Well, I do blame The Media to a large extent.
Might as well face it, pooing is cool



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.