Unsymmetrical diamond interchanges.

Started by ColossalBlocks, September 07, 2017, 01:44:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Should they all get replaced by symmetrical interchanges or not?

Yes.
No.
Maybe.

ColossalBlocks

I am inactive for a while now my dudes. Good associating with y'all.

US Highways: 36, 49, 61, 412.

Interstates: 22, 24, 44, 55, 57, 59, 72, 74 (West).


WillWeaverRVA

Will Weaver
WillWeaverRVA Photography | Twitter

"But how will the oxen know where to drown if we renumber the Oregon Trail?" - NE2

triplemultiplex

"That's just like... your opinion, man."

froggie

To ColossalBlocks:  have you considered that topography or development or other impediments might be why some asymmetrical diamond interchanges exist?

GaryV

First, why bother to rebuild what already exists and works?

But depending on what you mean by symmetrical, what axis or axes you are looking at, in many places a symmetrical diamond is impossible.  Unless the roads meet at an exact 90 degree angle, one leg is going to have to be longer than the other.

jeffandnicole

Interchanges - and most road features - look cool from the air.  But when we're on the ground, we're not going to notice little things like unsymmetrical diamond interchanges.

kkt

You realize the way you phrase the poll, if I can find even one asymmetrical diamond anywhere that shouldn't be rebuilt, I vote "no"?

Why, yes, I did study symbolic logic, why do you ask?

paulthemapguy

Avatar is the last interesting highway I clinched.
My website! http://www.paulacrossamerica.com Every US highway is on there!
My USA Shield Gallery https://flic.kr/s/aHsmHwJRZk
TM Clinches https://bit.ly/2UwRs4O

National collection status: Every US Route and (fully built) Interstate has a photo now! Just Alaska and Hawaii left!



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.