So when is YouTube going to fix its video size?

Started by bandit957, August 08, 2025, 10:21:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

bandit957

I think this has been broken now since 2018. When you use a home computer (not a smartphone), videos on YouTube appear much too big, especially if it's a low-resolution video.

When is YouTube going to finally fix this?
Might as well face it, pooing is cool


SEWIGuy

Quote from: bandit957 on August 08, 2025, 10:21:35 AMI think this has been broken now since 2018. When you use a home computer (not a smartphone), videos on YouTube appear much too big, especially if it's a low-resolution video.

When is YouTube going to finally fix this?

Mine looks fine.

Dirt Roads

My son, who is a budding gaming designer, just had a similar discussion yesterday.  The old-fashioned answer is that "all programs should reach out to the 'terminal' to grab the pixel dimensions of its current display screen and adjust the resolution and centering of the imagery sent over IP".  The modern-day approach is that the App depends on the user's computer to adjust the image properly, and when it doesn't, the user has to reconfigure the display on their own device (and then readjust back afterwards).  Doesn't make a lick of sense.

App designers see this as a compatibility problem that they don't want to keep up with.  I see it as a simple math problem.  I wasn't a software developer, but still got the pleasure of doing this kind of work on a occasional basis.  One program that we developed pulled in GIS mapping coordinates for any train network, then adjusted the GIS coordinates according to current screen size.  Fairly simple math.

vdeane

It's also worth noting that the purpose of YouTube has shifted from "site where amateurs submit short video clips at whatever quality they can manage" to "streaming service that outsources content creation to its users".  While the older paradigm still exists, their bread and butter is professional content creators using it as their platform.  As such, it's based around longer, higher quality videos than it once was.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

LilianaUwU

Way too often I click on the full screen button and despite the video being the perfect size, it shoves a horizontal scroll bar on the bottom of the screen, ruining the viewing experience.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her. Also, I'm an admin on the AARoads Wiki.

CtrlAltDel

#5
Quote from: LilianaUwU on August 08, 2025, 02:33:22 PMWay too often I click on the full screen button and despite the video being the perfect size, it shoves a horizontal scroll bar on the bottom of the screen, ruining the viewing experience.

Yes, I hate this too. There are U-Block extensions that will get rid of it, though.
I-290   I-294   I-55   (I-74)   (I-72)   I-40   I-30   US-59   US-190   TX-30   TX-6

LilianaUwU

Quote from: CtrlAltDel on August 08, 2025, 03:28:40 PM
Quote from: LilianaUwU on August 08, 2025, 02:33:22 PMWay too often I click on the full screen button and despite the video being the perfect size, it shoves a horizontal scroll bar on the bottom of the screen, ruining the viewing experience.

Yes, I hate this too. There are U-Block extensions that will get rid of it, though.

Please enlighten me.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her. Also, I'm an admin on the AARoads Wiki.

CtrlAltDel

Quote from: LilianaUwU on August 08, 2025, 03:44:49 PM
Quote from: CtrlAltDel on August 08, 2025, 03:28:40 PM
Quote from: LilianaUwU on August 08, 2025, 02:33:22 PMWay too often I click on the full screen button and despite the video being the perfect size, it shoves a horizontal scroll bar on the bottom of the screen, ruining the viewing experience.

Yes, I hate this too. There are U-Block extensions that will get rid of it, though.

Please enlighten me.

This filter should work:
youtube.com##body, ytd-app[scrolling]:style(overflow-x: hidden !important;)
I-290   I-294   I-55   (I-74)   (I-72)   I-40   I-30   US-59   US-190   TX-30   TX-6

mgk920

I'm more worried about if/when the British age-access verification rules will be reaching YT on this side of the 'Pond' . . .   :-o

Mike

vdeane

Quote from: mgk920 on August 08, 2025, 06:00:49 PMI'm more worried about if/when the British age-access verification rules will be reaching YT on this side of the 'Pond' . . .   :-o

Mike
Honestly, part of me wonders if this obsession with age verification is just a way for them to track who's browsing what online.  The Supreme Court (the US one, that is) is even claiming that there's no right to anonymously view explicit media.  They're basically outright saying at this point that nobody has any right to privacy.

Also worth noting that Google's already testing out trying to estimate ages through watch history, so those of us who like to keep that disabled are likely to have problems down the line.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

LilianaUwU

Quote from: vdeane on August 08, 2025, 10:23:51 PMHonestly, part of me wonders if this obsession with age verification is just a way for them to track who's browsing what online.
That is EXACTLY what it is. It's also a way to censor LGBTQ+ content online by lumping it in with the actual things they want to control.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her. Also, I'm an admin on the AARoads Wiki.

Scott5114

What sucks for YouTube is that I follow like, two guys on there, and pretty much the only other thing I use it for is a glitchy version of FM radio. If they start getting ideas, they are laughably easy for me to replace.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

kalvado

Quote from: vdeane on August 08, 2025, 10:23:51 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on August 08, 2025, 06:00:49 PMI'm more worried about if/when the British age-access verification rules will be reaching YT on this side of the 'Pond' . . .   :-o

Mike
Honestly, part of me wonders if this obsession with age verification is just a way for them to track who's browsing what online.  The Supreme Court (the US one, that is) is even claiming that there's no right to anonymously view explicit media.  They're basically outright saying at this point that nobody has any right to privacy.

Also worth noting that Google's already testing out trying to estimate ages through watch history, so those of us who like to keep that disabled are likely to have problems down the line.
Getting a foot into the door, probably ultimate goal is fully de-anonimised social media.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.