Sine salad

[freebrickproductions]

Interesting how the I-26 shield lacks the "Interstate" branding above the number.

It's not allowed to be shown since it's a Future route.

Huh, didn't know that.

[hbelkins]

Interesting how the I-26 shield lacks the "Interstate" branding above the number.

It's not allowed to be shown since it's a Future route.

Huh, didn't know that.

Some of the I-73 and I-74 signs farther east in North Carolina have the word 'FUTURE" where the word "INTERSTATE" goes, instead of a blank spot and a "FUTURE" auxiliary plate as is the case with this I-26 sign.

[Jim]

Some of the I-73 and I-74 signs farther east in North Carolina have the word 'FUTURE" where the word "INTERSTATE" goes, instead of a blank spot and a "FUTURE" auxiliary plate as is the case with this I-26 sign.

Here's an example from back on January 2, 2010.  (And I guess it's also a tiny bit of salad to make it almost appropriate for this thread anyway.)

[LilianaUwU]

Interesting how the I-26 shield lacks the "Interstate" branding above the number.

It's not allowed to be shown since it's a Future route.

Which is stupid and wasteful. If it's labeled as future, then why does it matter?

[formulanone]

Interesting how the I-26 shield lacks the "Interstate" branding above the number.

It's not allowed to be shown since it's a Future route.

Which is stupid and wasteful. If it's labeled as future, then why does it matter?

Because thirty years ago, the road might have ended in a pile of aluminum cans in one direction, and onto a narrow crumbling farm road at the other.

[hbelkins]

[roadman65]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/54480415@N08/54266462874

[roadman65]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/54480415@N08/54301402393
Four control cities on one guide.

[Road Hog]

Arkansas is stingy with sign salads, but I saw one in downtown Prescott a few days ago. It was raining hard so I couldn't get a photo, but I'm sure it's on GSV.

ADD: https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8023462,-93.3807576,3a,15y,338.57h,92.86t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1smRrel56xAXiBCyxOmPkLzQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-2.858610193400267%26panoid%3DmRrel56xAXiBCyxOmPkLzQ%26yaw%3D338.57492844000205!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDEyOS4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

[roadman65]

https://maps.app.goo.gl/SbDiUZCphW9Th51i7?g_st=ac


The Exit 5B guide has information overload as well as what should be a pull through sign.

[thenetwork]

https://maps.app.goo.gl/SbDiUZCphW9Th51i7?g_st=ac


The Exit 5B guide has information overload as well as what should be a pull through sign.

Apparantly, they are in no hurry to replace the yellow overhead's information, since there's not enough time for drivers to read that sign as well...

[kphoger]

https://maps.app.goo.gl/SbDiUZCphW9Th51i7?g_st=ac

The Exit 5B guide has information overload as well as what should be a pull through sign.

I only see four signs on that gantry.  Not a sine salad.

[formulanone]

Brewton, Alabama



Fayette, Alabama

[wanderer2575]

^  Love the stairstepping on that first sign.  The vertical posts don't look tilted (as they would had they been hit) so it looks like the whole thing was originally installed that way.

[roadman65]

https://maps.app.goo.gl/MJ24HrzFPQaJx8Uz5?g_st=ac

Too many guides. Plus there are two guides for US 158 East and NC 12 North.

[kphoger]

https://maps.app.goo.gl/MJ24HrzFPQaJx8Uz5?g_st=ac

Too many guides. Plus there are two guides for US 158 East and NC 12 North.

I do like the panel-per-lane approach, but I agree it's just too much information all at once.

[roadfro]

https://maps.app.goo.gl/MJ24HrzFPQaJx8Uz5?g_st=ac

Too many guides. Plus there are two guides for US 158 East and NC 12 North.

I do like the panel-per-lane approach, but I agree it's just too much information all at once.

Same. I'm also confused why different lanes are signed for different destinations for the same highway. I'm not familiar with the area, but it doesn't seem like you would necessarily need that level of granularity in destination/lane control right at this junction point.

[plain]

https://maps.app.goo.gl/MJ24HrzFPQaJx8Uz5?g_st=ac

Too many guides. Plus there are two guides for US 158 East and NC 12 North.

I do like the panel-per-lane approach, but I agree it's just too much information all at once.

Same. I'm also confused why different lanes are signed for different destinations for the same highway. I'm not familiar with the area, but it doesn't seem like you wouldn't necessarily need that level of granularity in destination/lane control right at this junction point.

I don't know if it's been attempted already, but these signs would be great for the Redesign This! thread.

[roadman65]

Here on the Mullica Hill Bypass in Harrison Twp, Gloucester County, NJ  has it within one guide let along two guides.