Count for 710 freeway gap study starts

Started by cpzilliacus, May 14, 2012, 05:52:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

blawp

Rosemead Blvd was just recently redone and it's not a bad 710 alternate.


Interstate Trav

Quote from: kendancy66 on June 01, 2012, 12:28:21 AM
Quote from: Interstate Trav on May 31, 2012, 01:19:00 PM
Quote from: kendancy66 on May 20, 2012, 02:38:27 PM
Quote from: Interstate Trav on May 20, 2012, 02:19:01 PM
Quote from: blawp on May 20, 2012, 01:34:56 PM
They should sign Fremont Ave as Temp. 710.

Wouldn't South Pasadena get upset at this?  As they won't let the 710 get built.
Who cares if they get upset.  Route signage is for the general public benefit.  Would they rather have motorist getting lost.

I think South Pasadena would rather people get lost.  I'm a supporter of building the 710, and I wasn't defending South Pasadena, but I think they don't want any signs for the 710 in anyway shape or form.

If I was in charge, I would give South Pasadena two choices,  Better through route signage from 710 to 210 or I will tear down all the houses on the CalTrans owned rights of way.

Could Not agree more.

Interstate Trav

Quote from: blawp on June 02, 2012, 02:39:34 AM
Rosemead Blvd was just recently redone and it's not a bad 710 alternate.

I still want to see the 710 completed.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.