News:

Check out the AARoads Wiki!

Main Menu

Mississippi

Started by Alex, January 20, 2009, 09:50:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

froggie

Quote from: Tom958 on May 10, 2025, 03:39:13 PMDoes anyone here know why the I-59-MS 42 interchange is the way it is?

The footprint of the interchange is huge, and they demolished some buildings to make way for it. There's a third bay under the bridge for a southbound CD to serve the existing loop plus a future loop for southbound 59-to-eastbound 42 traffic. The advantage of this two-adjacent-loop layout is that it eliminates the need for a traffic signal on the west side of the interchange. However, they still built the ramps on that side to intersect perpendicularly with 42, which you'd do only if the intention was for traffic to turn left there. Indeed, there's a left turn pocket striped there now even though it's redundant.

If MS 42 was extended to the northwest, it could serve as an extension of the US 49 Hattiesburg bypass, but the extra ramps don't seem helpful for traffic headed along that route.

Also, while I mentioned the third bridge span to accommodate a future CD road, the existing loop ramp would have to be almost completely reconstructed to tie into the CD and pass through the span. See what I mean?

I'd appreciate any insight y'all cound provide.

Dating back at least to when I was stationed in Mississippi the FIRST time (so talking 25 years ago now), there were two considerations being made for extending a roadway west of that interchange.  One was as a new alignment freeway for an occasionally-proposed "Jackson-Gulf Coast Interstate", in order to avoid heavy development along the US 49/MS 42 concurrency.

The second consideration was to extend such a road as part of a beltway around the Hattiesburg area.  This is still being considered as part of the MPO's transportation plan.

I want to say I saw early schematics of an "ultimate configuration" of a cloverleaf for the I-69/MS 42 interchange...this would certainly explain why it's so wide on the west side and the frontage road was built farther out in the southeast corner.

------------------------

Speaking of the Hattiesburg area, I found this news piece from last fall that MDOT is considering converting the I-59/US 11 interchange at Exit 60 into a diverging diamond.


kenarmy

#776
I had the understanding that US 51 has a (mostly) hidden concurrency with I-55 from County Line Road south to Crystal Springs.. However, MDOT labels the short four-lane spur from US 80 to Interstate 55 as US 51 and Wikipedia notes the State Street exit as "US 51 North." Can anyone explain this?
https://path.mdot.ms.gov/projmap

P.S. I see a 2025 map depicting the US 84-US 98 concurrency.
Just a reminder that US 6, 49, 50, and 98 are superior to your fave routes :)


EXTEND 206 SO IT CAN MEET ITS PARENT.

The Ghostbuster

There is information about the seemingly continued existence of a US 84/98 duplex in Western Mississippi at the Natchez page on usends.com: https://www.usends.com/natchez.html.

froggie

Quote from: The Ghostbuster on June 16, 2025, 11:48:22 AMThere is information about the seemingly continued existence of a US 84/98 duplex in Western Mississippi at the Natchez page on usends.com: https://www.usends.com/natchez.html.

There have been a number of posts about it on this forum over the years as well.  Here are a couple of my own posts:

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=2400.msg54092#msg54092

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=28690.msg2579522#msg2579522


Long story short, per MDOT (and I received an email years ago from them on this), 98 ends at 84 in Bude.  Though it appears they never sent AASHTO a truncation request.

As for US 51 through or around Jackson, it was relocated onto I-55 a number of decades back, but since the spur into downtown from the south remained on the state highway system, it somehow kept US 51 shields.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.