Interesting new intersection / interchange design

Started by berberry, August 31, 2013, 02:25:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

berberry

This showed up in my facebook newsfeed.  It is apparently a Chinese student's idea.  What do you think?



ET21

Little U-Turn ramps, how cute.

Looks interesting
The local weatherman, trust me I can be 99.9% right!
"Show where you're going, without forgetting where you're from"

Clinched:
IL: I-88, I-180, I-190, I-290, I-294, I-355, IL-390
IN: I-80, I-94
SD: I-190
WI: I-90
MI: I-94, I-196
MN: I-90

hotdogPi

It seems like if it was real, the slope would be too much.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

berberry

#3
I know, and it looks like it could be used to improve busy intersections on ordinary streets, simce it doesn't seem to require much space.

hotdogPi

Those off-ramps (to turn) seem to have about a 25% grade.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

berberry

Quote from: 1 on August 31, 2013, 02:36:49 PM
Those off-ramps (to turn) seem to have about a 25% grade.

Which is why I'm thinking it would be most useful where traffic doesn't move very fast anyway but could benefit from a removal of signals to allow slow but free flow.  The only way I could see it being used on a freeway is if traffic exiting or entering the freeway, which should be the lower road, were to be separated from the main lanes, as with a protected cloverleaf.

NE2

http://www.china.org.cn/china/2011-04/08/content_22316107.htm (hey Beavis, that's not a cloverleaf heheheh)
QuoteXiao Rucheng, professor at Shanghai-based Tongji University, told China Daily the size of the bridge would be much larger than expected if put into construction. If so, it would lose the value of fitting into small junctions.

It's a typical modern third-world or 1940s first-world design. And that cityscape is 1950s urban renewal grand empty plazas.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

Truvelo

I like the way all the trucks are using the left most lane of the freeway, something that is illegal is some countries.
Speed limits limit life

FightingIrish

Not bad, except that I hate left exits. But I guess it would still be effective.

I would imagine most actual implementations would get rid of the u-turn ramps.

jeffandnicole

Notice the white cars in the lower left.  Their lane simply ends.

hotdogPi

Quote from: jeffandnicole on August 31, 2013, 04:00:43 PM
Notice the white cars in the lower left.  Their lane simply ends.

I think that lane merges with the light blue cars.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

iwishiwascanadian

It seems like it would work with little traffic but the off-ramp from the major road to the elevated road could get backed up with cars waiting to merge. 

pianocello

If the grading is a problem, it looks like this would be a good idea with a major road intersecting two one-way streets.

On a different note, the weaving for the left turn motions would be awful for a high-traffic intersection.
Davenport, IA -> Valparaiso, IN -> Ames, IA -> Orlando, FL -> Gainesville, FL -> Evansville, IN

triplemultiplex

Looks like it would make a fun go-cart track.
"That's just like... your opinion, man."

empirestate


froggie

The issues I see with this are manyfold:

#1:  left exits or entrances
#2:  tight turning radii
#3:  as mentioned before, to get ramps that short would require VERY steep grades on the ramps
#4:  would require lots of bridging or retaining walls, both of which would drive the cost up considerably
#5:  requires a roadway that already has a wide right-of-way, especially for those U-turn ramps.

If we're talking about two non-freeway routes, would be more beneficial to just put in a CFI or flyover.  Heck, even a "volleyball" would be more space-efficient.

31E

A tight SPUI would probably be more effective, or even a three-level stacked roundabout. Or like froggie says you could put in a CFI.

johndoe


jeffandnicole

Note, as well, when you start incorporating those overpasses, you go from 5 lanes to no more than 4, and most likely 3.  I think the creator purposely left those skip lines off the overpasses, realizing the limitations to the design.  By looking at it, the cars are quite tight next to each other on the overpasses.  Thus, traffic wouldn't be as free-flowing as it appears.

empirestate

Quote from: johndoe on September 01, 2013, 10:02:20 AM
Quote from: empirestate on September 01, 2013, 12:34:11 AM
So, this more or less.
Very cool, thanks for sharing!

By the way, is my example (I-95 at Florida SR 84) unique, or are there others like it? I don't know of any.

colinstu

Not to mention the terrible amount of weaving that intersection would require for people wanting to enter a road and to exit.

No thanks.

EDIT... originally asked "How exactly is the artery going from left-right supposed to turn left? "

I see it now.

NE2

Quote from: empirestate on September 01, 2013, 03:47:38 PM
By the way, is my example (I-95 at Florida SR 84) unique, or are there others like it? I don't know of any.
There's a half version at DC 295 and Benning Road (and it has a random U-turn ramp): https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=38.895805,-76.952239&spn=0.003211,0.007086&gl=us&t=k&z=18
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

Alps

This would be slightly more feasible by using the outermost lanes to cross over the intersecting road, and having the innermost lane(s) for the right-turn movements. That would also allow the bike lanes and sidewalks to continue over. The bike lanes/sidewalks on the lower street would have to rise up to meet the ones on the upper street to avoid the ramps, and then cross over _somehow_ (I'm thinking these alternate between intersections where the next road is on the bottom, top, bottom, etc.)



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.