Arrow-Per-Lane (APL) signs

[Rothman]

The Utah ones immediately came to mind...until I saw you mentioned them.

[wanderer2575]

Bumping thread with request ... I'm looking for spots with two closely-spaced interchanges (or downstream ramp splits) where both interchanges / splits are referenced on one arrow per lane (APL) on either full width (FW) or partial-width (PW) variety.  I'm curious if you know of spots that seem to take liberties with these "shall" statements:

MUTCD 2E.40
Standard:
08 Overhead Arrow-per-Lane guide signs shall not be used to depict a downstream split of an exit ramp on a sign located on the mainline.

MUTCD 2E.42
Standard:
03 The through route and/or destination shall not be displayed on the partial-width Overhead Arrow-perLane guide sign.

This one in Hazel Park, MI defies 2E.40, I think.  I've posted this one before.  Lane 5 is exit-only to I-696; lane 4 is optional to I-696 and then exit-only to 11 Mile Road (the next exit).
https://maps.app.goo.gl/ekXJKEy8QoBJXQ2V7

This one on the westbound leg of the interchange defies 2E.42, but I'm not sure if this is what you mean since there isn't a second interchange following.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/2w4McZjJbsYqvwGT8

[Scott5114]

I-15 NB approaching I-11 and I-435 EB in Kansas approaching US-69 are two I can think of where multiple ramps are shown on the same APL.