AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered at https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=33904.0
Corrected several already and appreciate your patience as we work through the rest.

Author Topic: Early Proposals for I-95 & I-64?  (Read 5636 times)

WillWeaverRVA

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2134
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Richmond, VA
  • Last Login: Today at 08:40:15 AM
    • WillWeaverRVA Photography
Early Proposals for I-95 & I-64?
« on: August 14, 2009, 01:13:37 AM »

Yes, more Richmond stuff. I live here, so I guess I should post it. :p

I was browsing some local news blogs and came across these newspaper scans from the 1950s. They seem to detail community proposals for what are now I-95, I-64, and their overlap through central and eastern Richmond. Unfortunately, there's not a whole lot in the way of text. Basically, it proposes a freeway to run about 1/2 to 1 mile south of where current I-64 is just east of I-95, and a north-south freeway in central Richmond with an interchange at Franklin Street (and oddly enough not Main, which was/is VA 147 in that location - and yes, I know I-95 blows off VA 147 today).

Interestingly it should be noted that the proposed routing of I-64 would have destroyed a good chunk of Church Hill and Fairmount, and the apparent proposed I-95 (I'm guessing it's I-95, as it's a north-south freeway; the drawing is looking south) was a depressed freeway unlike current I-95 south of I-64. Not sure that would have worked either without destroying Shockoe Bottom.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2009, 12:49:17 PM by SyntheticDreamer »
Logged
Will Weaver
WillWeaverRVA Photography | Twitter

"But how will the oxen know where to drown if we renumber the Oregon Trail?" - NE2

74/171FAN

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4729
  • Age: 31
  • Location: Harrisburg, PA
  • Last Login: Today at 09:59:45 AM
Re: Early Proposals for I-95 & I-64?
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2009, 09:58:23 AM »

Wow Richmond would look much different if this had gone through and they might would be talking about tearing down the freeway now like those in Syracuse who want to tear down I-81 ;-)
Logged
I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

froggie

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 12842
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: Today at 10:16:07 AM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: Early Proposals for I-95 & I-64?
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2009, 06:57:14 PM »

That newspaper dates from June 1950.  From what I can tell, it's revised versions of the original 1946 Virginia Highway Department study on expressways in Richmond and Petersburg.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.