News:

Finished coding the back end of the AARoads main site using object-orientated programming. One major step closer to moving away from Wordpress!

Main Menu

It's time to revive the northern half of I-840

Started by I-39, July 21, 2015, 07:37:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Daniel Fiddler

Indeed.  From most to least utilized, the spokes are:

I-24 E, and it stays overcrowded all the way to I-75 in Chattanooga
I-65 N, and it stays overcrowded to the Kentucky line, where they've 6 lanes it
I-65 S, it's heavy until TN 96 Franklin, MAYBE Saturn Parkway, then it dies down a lot
I-40 E, it's heaviest to Lebanon, but stays busy all the way to I-81
I-40 W, it is really not that busy for local traffic past Charlotte Pike usually, mostly long-distance
I-24 W: almost no traffic, completely opposite of I-24 E
Daniel W. Fiddler
https://www.danielfiddler.com/

There is no pain, you are receding
A distant ship, smoke on the horizon
You are only coming through in waves
Your lips move, but I can't hear what you're saying
When I was a child, I caught a fleeting glimpse
Out of the corner of my eye
I turned to look, but it was gone
I cannot put my finger on it now
The child is grown, the dream is gone.


sparker

Quote from: Daniel Fiddler on August 28, 2021, 05:47:26 PM
Indeed.  From most to least utilized, the spokes are:

I-24 E, and it stays overcrowded all the way to I-75 in Chattanooga
I-65 N, and it stays overcrowded to the Kentucky line, where they've 6 lanes it
I-65 S, it's heavy until TN 96 Franklin, MAYBE Saturn Parkway, then it dies down a lot
I-40 E, it's heaviest to Lebanon, but stays busy all the way to I-81
I-40 W, it is really not that busy for local traffic past Charlotte Pike usually, mostly long-distance
I-24 W: almost no traffic, completely opposite of I-24 E

Right.  The perennial issue with the underutilized I-24 corridor NW of Nashville is the fact that isn't part of a particularly useful commercial corridor to anywhere except St. Louis.  Chicago and environs, the "800-pound-gorilla" of commercial origin/destination points in the upper Midwest, really doesn't have a completely direct route to Chattanooga and, of course, Atlanta and Florida beyond that; the I-57/24 combination just adds too much mileage due to the lateral/E-W section in KY.  Truckers use I-65 because it's there and the "best of a bad lot" for that purpose -- and because of that, there's plenty of truck-related amenities situated along that corridor.  Venturing into the fictional realm for a second or two, an upgraded corridor more or less along US 41 via Terre Haute connecting I-69 and Evansville with either I-65 or I-57 near Chicago might, via I-69/169 in KY, provide such a direct connection; it would be a safe guess that the commercial traffic level on the aforementioned section of I-24 would increase dramatically.  Hell, truck tolls could even help pay for the I-69 Ohio River bridge project!   

I-55

The Northeast link would exist if the TN-109 speed limit wasn't set at 55. It should be 65 in most places.
Purdue Civil Engineering '24
Quote from: I-55 on April 13, 2025, 09:39:41 PMThe correct question is "if ARDOT hasn't signed it, why does Google show it?" and the answer as usual is "because Google Maps signs stuff incorrectly all the time"