News:

Am able to again make updates to the Shield Gallery!
- Alex

Main Menu

Massachusetts milepost exit numbering conversion contract

Started by roadman, October 28, 2015, 05:28:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Old Dominionite

#1325
During all my years in New England (including 4 years of college in Worcester), I never thought twice about I-395 and I-290, and I never heard anyone else voice confusion or concern about the numbering change at the Mass. Pike. To me I-395 and I-290 have always functioned as separate routes. For example, coming westbound on I-290, the majority of traffic exits either at the Pike or US 20.

I don't see any value in placing dual mileposts on I-290. And I certainly don't see any value to renumbering I-290 as an extension of I-395 in the future. I think that move would cause significant confusion within and around Worcester -- to say nothing about the costs to businesses having to remarket themselves and educate customer bases.

And what happens to I-190? Does it keep the same number and serve as a disconnected orphan route (now confusingly) several miles from its parent route, or does it have to renumbered as well?

I think the current numbering convention works. I-395 is a spur from I-95 through eastern Connecticut up into central Massachusetts. I-290 is a loop through Worcester that parallels its parent route to the north. And I-190 is a spur off I-290 to the Fitchburg area.

MassDOT's ideas of placing dual mileposts and potentially renumbering I-290 appear to be "solutions" in search of a problem.


SkyPesos

Quote from: Old Dominionite on September 05, 2021, 11:08:29 AM
During all my years in New England (including 4 years of college in Worcester), I never thought twice about I-395 and I-290, and I never heard anyone else voice confusion or concern about the numbering change at the Mass. Pike. To me I-395 and I-290 have always functioned as separate routes. For example, coming westbound on I-290, the majority of traffic exits either at the Pike or US 20.
For some history, I-290 came first, and it was initially the number proposed for the Worcester-New London interstate, as it's pretty much a continuation south. Not sure why it was changed to I-395 later down the line in the drawing board, but I guess that it has something to do with AASHTO getting picky with the numbering.

JWF1959

Quote from: SkyPesos on September 05, 2021, 11:22:47 AM
Quote from: Old Dominionite on September 05, 2021, 11:08:29 AM
During all my years in New England (including 4 years of college in Worcester), I never thought twice about I-395 and I-290, and I never heard anyone else voice confusion or concern about the numbering change at the Mass. Pike. To me I-395 and I-290 have always functioned as separate routes. For example, coming westbound on I-290, the majority of traffic exits either at the Pike or US 20.
For some history, I-290 came first, and it was initially the number proposed for the Worcester-New London interstate, as it's pretty much a continuation south. Not sure why it was changed to I-395 later down the line in the drawing board, but I guess that it has something to do with AASHTO getting picky with the numbering.

Wasn't I-395 originally numbered Route 52 for awhile?  I seem to remember where I-290 ended, the road became Route 52 for a period of time.

snowc

southeastern road geek since 2001.
here's my clinched counties https://mob-rule.com/user/snowc
and my clinched roads https://travelmapping.net/user/?units=miles&u=snowc
i'm on kartaview as well https://kartaview.org/user/computer-geek
wikipedia too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BryceM2001

hotdogPi

Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

snowc

southeastern road geek since 2001.
here's my clinched counties https://mob-rule.com/user/snowc
and my clinched roads https://travelmapping.net/user/?units=miles&u=snowc
i'm on kartaview as well https://kartaview.org/user/computer-geek
wikipedia too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BryceM2001

SkyPesos

It's left exit 26 now.

Btw, any images of the "left exit 12" sign with the new 26 exit number? I checked this thread , and didn't find any here.

jp the roadgeek

Quote from: JWF1959 on September 05, 2021, 03:19:39 PM
Quote from: SkyPesos on September 05, 2021, 11:22:47 AM
Quote from: Old Dominionite on September 05, 2021, 11:08:29 AM
During all my years in New England (including 4 years of college in Worcester), I never thought twice about I-395 and I-290, and I never heard anyone else voice confusion or concern about the numbering change at the Mass. Pike. To me I-395 and I-290 have always functioned as separate routes. For example, coming westbound on I-290, the majority of traffic exits either at the Pike or US 20.
For some history, I-290 came first, and it was initially the number proposed for the Worcester-New London interstate, as it's pretty much a continuation south. Not sure why it was changed to I-395 later down the line in the drawing board, but I guess that it has something to do with AASHTO getting picky with the numbering.

Wasn't I-395 originally numbered Route 52 for awhile?  I seem to remember where I-290 ended, the road became Route 52 for a period of time.

That would've been the case prior to 1983.  I-395 was CT/MA 52.
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

snowc

Quote from: SkyPesos on September 06, 2021, 12:28:24 AM
It's left exit 26 now.

Btw, any images of the "left exit 12" sign with the new 26 exit number? I checked this thread , and didn't find any here.
Only one I can find is a meme that I made.
southeastern road geek since 2001.
here's my clinched counties https://mob-rule.com/user/snowc
and my clinched roads https://travelmapping.net/user/?units=miles&u=snowc
i'm on kartaview as well https://kartaview.org/user/computer-geek
wikipedia too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BryceM2001

yakra

"Officer, I'm always careful to drive the speed limit no matter where I am and that's what I was doin'." Said "No, you weren't," she said, "Yes, I was." He said, "Madam, I just clocked you at 22 MPH," and she said "That's the speed limit," he said "No ma'am, that's the route numbah!"  - Gary Crocker

bob7374

I've completed posting photos taken of exit renumbering along I-290 East, including some which include examples of the dual mile markers:


All can be found here: https://malmeroads.net/mass21c/neexitrenumbering.html#i290signs

I hope to get photos of along I-290 West soon.

bob7374


kramie13

I received an email from MassDOT today, indicating that the exit renumbering project is complete.

You have to give the contractors a lot of credit, completing this in under a year during a global pandemic.

bob7374

Quote from: kramie13 on September 08, 2021, 04:09:20 PM
I received an email from MassDOT today, indicating that the exit renumbering project is complete.

You have to give the contractors a lot of credit, completing this in under a year during a global pandemic.
Here's the official MassDOT blog post that echoes the email:
http://blog.mass.gov/transportation/massdot-highway/statewide-exit-renumbering-work-complete/

shadyjay

I do have to hand it to them (MassDOT, and the contractor) for getting it done so quickly and efficiently.  After the first attempt a couple years ago, we weren't sure when/if the state was going to convert, but then they went for it, and got it done. 

A lot of states could learn from this... (cough...CT...cough).  A project will be released next year to renumber CT 8's exits.  For some reason, CT is changing out perfectly good exit tabs (some tabs on signs that haven't even been installed yet) instead of using overlays.  Seems like an incredible waste of time and money.  No wonder the project to renumber CT exits will take 10 years. 

kramie13


bob7374

#1341
I've posted the photos taken during a trip along I-290 East last Sunday, these include many new overhead signs with non-centered numbers on their exit tabs:


and the placing of a wrong exit number for the MA 122A exit, should be 17 (MA 122 is 18), the distance is wrong to, it is 1 1/2 miles to the MA 122A ramp from the sign location:


All the photos are at New England Exit Renumbering Central:
https://malmeroads.net/mass21c/neexitrenumbering.html#i290signs

bob7374

With the Exit Renumbering Project completed, I've summarized my views on both the good and the not so good aspects of the project on the Gribblenation Blog Site:
https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/09/massachusetts-exit-renumbering-good-bad.html

SkyPesos

Quote from: bob7374 on September 24, 2021, 11:52:32 PM
With the Exit Renumbering Project completed, I've summarized my views on both the good and the not so good aspects of the project on the Gribblenation Blog Site:
https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/09/massachusetts-exit-renumbering-good-bad.html
I thought Gribblenation is mainly focused on roads in the Southwestern US (California mostly) from the compilation thread (and all the threads in the Southwest board) for the site. Nice to see it expanding to other parts of the country.

Alps

Quote from: SkyPesos on September 25, 2021, 01:43:12 AM
Quote from: bob7374 on September 24, 2021, 11:52:32 PM
With the Exit Renumbering Project completed, I've summarized my views on both the good and the not so good aspects of the project on the Gribblenation Blog Site:
https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/09/massachusetts-exit-renumbering-good-bad.html
I thought Gribblenation is mainly focused on roads in the Southwestern US (California mostly) from the compilation thread (and all the threads in the Southwest board) for the site. Nice to see it expanding to other parts of the country.
Um, Gribblenation is a northeastern-based website... it just happens to have a quite active SW contributor.

SkyPesos

Quote from: Alps on September 25, 2021, 02:00:15 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on September 25, 2021, 01:43:12 AM
Quote from: bob7374 on September 24, 2021, 11:52:32 PM
With the Exit Renumbering Project completed, I've summarized my views on both the good and the not so good aspects of the project on the Gribblenation Blog Site:
https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/09/massachusetts-exit-renumbering-good-bad.html
I thought Gribblenation is mainly focused on roads in the Southwestern US (California mostly) from the compilation thread (and all the threads in the Southwest board) for the site. Nice to see it expanding to other parts of the country.
Um, Gribblenation is a northeastern-based website... it just happens to have a quite active SW contributor.
Oh... I didn't know that.

CanesFan27

Quote from: SkyPesos on September 25, 2021, 01:43:12 AM
Quote from: bob7374 on September 24, 2021, 11:52:32 PM
With the Exit Renumbering Project completed, I've summarized my views on both the good and the not so good aspects of the project on the Gribblenation Blog Site:
https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/09/massachusetts-exit-renumbering-good-bad.html
I thought Gribblenation is mainly focused on roads in the Southwestern US (California mostly) from the compilation thread (and all the threads in the Southwest board) for the site. Nice to see it expanding to other parts of the country.

You don't know us that well, do you?

Rothman

Quote from: CanesFan27 on September 25, 2021, 09:52:39 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on September 25, 2021, 01:43:12 AM
Quote from: bob7374 on September 24, 2021, 11:52:32 PM
With the Exit Renumbering Project completed, I've summarized my views on both the good and the not so good aspects of the project on the Gribblenation Blog Site:
https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/09/massachusetts-exit-renumbering-good-bad.html
I thought Gribblenation is mainly focused on roads in the Southwestern US (California mostly) from the compilation thread (and all the threads in the Southwest board) for the site. Nice to see it expanding to other parts of the country.

You don't know us that well, do you?
Hey now, give the overly assertive newbie a little slack.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position(s) of NYSDOT.

Alps

Quote from: Rothman on September 25, 2021, 11:06:42 AM
Quote from: CanesFan27 on September 25, 2021, 09:52:39 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on September 25, 2021, 01:43:12 AM
Quote from: bob7374 on September 24, 2021, 11:52:32 PM
With the Exit Renumbering Project completed, I've summarized my views on both the good and the not so good aspects of the project on the Gribblenation Blog Site:
https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/09/massachusetts-exit-renumbering-good-bad.html
I thought Gribblenation is mainly focused on roads in the Southwestern US (California mostly) from the compilation thread (and all the threads in the Southwest board) for the site. Nice to see it expanding to other parts of the country.

You don't know us that well, do you?
Hey now, give the overly assertive newbie a little slack.
sure why not now

CtrlAltDel

Quote from: bob7374 on September 24, 2021, 11:52:32 PM
With the Exit Renumbering Project completed, I've summarized my views on both the good and the not so good aspects of the project on the Gribblenation Blog Site:
https://www.gribblenation.org/2021/09/massachusetts-exit-renumbering-good-bad.html
They really half-assed that conversion, didn't they?
I-290   I-294   I-55   (I-74)   (I-72)   I-40   I-30   US-59   US-190   TX-30   TX-6



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.