AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  


New rules for political content in signatures and user profiles. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: Utah  (Read 21591 times)

Plutonic Panda

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 1183
  • Location: Los Angeles
  • Last Login: Today at 02:21:44 AM
Re: Utah
« Reply #150 on: February 13, 2020, 01:17:59 PM »

Shouldn’t be a bicycle route unless there are dedicated lanes or trails.


  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 611
  • Last Login: February 21, 2020, 11:37:23 PM
Re: Utah
« Reply #151 on: February 14, 2020, 12:24:36 AM »

St. George News reports that Toquerville is planning to rebuild most of UT-17 (which connects I-15 to La Verkin/Hurricane) on new alignment to bypass the town and then hand it over to UDOT. The article also includes news on other southern Utah projects, including the final section of UT-7 which might be done next year.

The new route that Toquerville proposes to build as the new SR-17 will bypass the small town completely and also provide a much safer and less winding route for travelers heading to Zion National Park and other parts of the eastern side of the county.

The new roadway will also be engineered to accommodate a much larger volume of traffic.

“It’s not wise to put that much traffic on the existing SR-17,” Ellsworth said.

The roadway is estimated to cost roughly $10 million and will initially be a two-lane road. After the new roadway is completed, Ellsworth said the city plans to hand the road over to UDOT, which he hopes will eventually widen it to five lanes.

Of note: UDOT recently completed a rebuild of the existing SR-17 with better shoulders and new pavement.

« Last Edit: February 14, 2020, 12:26:48 AM by Kniwt »

US 89

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 2520
  • 189 to Evanston!

  • Location: Salt Lake City/Atlanta
  • Last Login: Today at 02:13:58 AM
Re: Utah
« Reply #152 on: February 14, 2020, 04:48:16 PM »

The prospect of a Toquerville bypass built by the city fascinates me - I don't think I know of any other situation in Utah where a local jurisdiction built a new realignment with the idea that it would eventually be transferred permanently to UDOT. The closest thing I can think of would be the SR-224 realignment in the Deer Valley area, but in that case the old alignment was abandoned and I think it was done with an SR-224 truncation in mind (which ultimately never happened).
« Last Edit: February 14, 2020, 07:02:41 PM by US 89 »
Interstate clinches: 14 82 86ID 215UT 225 345 444 575 985
US clinches: 91 491 550



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.