AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules for political content in signatures and user profiles. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?  (Read 607 times)

GMoney0805

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 23
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Fargo, North Dakota
  • Last Login: June 08, 2019, 05:04:39 PM
I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« on: June 07, 2019, 03:59:49 PM »

Came across something very interesting the other day. In the original plan of the interstate system, I-31 was to run from Fargo northward, and I-29 was to run from Sioux Falls southward, with a 230+ mile gap between the two. What really surprised me is that after coming to the conclusion that there should be a freeway between Sioux Falls and Fargo, authorities had originally planned for I-29 to run through Minnesota instead, overlaying US 75. Eventually, I-29 was rerouted into South Dakota, but maintained a straight line route from Sioux Falls upward. Instead of going by cities such as Brookings, Watertown, and Sisseton, it was routed to go through smaller cities such as Clear Lake and Milbank. Nonetheless, according to the I-29 in SD Wikipedia article, “After [an] interchange, the highway turns northwest en route to Watertown. Early planning of this segment of I-29 had the route passing just east of Kranzburg, or about 9 miles east of Watertown. A past president of the Watertown Chamber of Commerce contacted C.L. Chase, a member of the Democratic National Committee, in an effort to get I-29 routed closer to Watertown. The effort was successful; the westward alignment became known locally as the Chase Bend.” I find it interesting that I-29 was originally planned to serve a city such as Watertown. Any thoughts. Granted this all occurred in the 50s and 60s but still. If I come up with more info on it I will be sure to post it here. Thanks!


iPhone
Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2169
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: June 15, 2019, 04:25:06 PM
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2019, 05:17:55 PM »

This sounds weird to me. How long was the "Minnesota" segment of Interstate 29 planned to be? The entire legnth of Minnesota's segment of US 75?
Logged

In_Correct

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 226
  • Location: TX
  • Last Login: Today at 04:27:21 AM
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2019, 08:53:12 PM »

Map???
Logged

rte66man

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1068
  • Location: Warr Acres, OK
  • Last Login: June 15, 2019, 04:37:58 PM
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2019, 11:14:05 AM »

It would have been nice for the quote to have a citation in the Wikipedia article.  I tend to discount much of what I read there for that exact reason.
Logged
When you come to a fork in the road... TAKE IT.

                                                               -Yogi Berra

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 10511
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: June 16, 2019, 09:15:12 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2019, 12:16:48 PM »

A few notes:

- The recommended 1939 version of the system had what is now I-29 north of Fargo largely in Minnesota, but had nothing between Fargo and Kansas City.

- The 1944 version (disregard my 1943 date...it came from the 1944 report) shifted north of Fargo to the North Dakota side but still had nothing between Fargo and Kansas City.  This version also had what is now I-90 placed mostly across northern Iowa instead of southern Minnesota...it would have utilized US 75 between Luverne, MN and somewhere near or south of Rock Rapids, IA.

- By 1947, the I-29 corridor was more or less on its current corridor, except for the then-gap between Sioux Falls and Fargo.  This gap was filled in late 1957, but still was on the Dakota side of the border.  This is also when the mid-1957-planned numbering of I-31 north of Fargo was changed to I-29.

I have found zero references in my Minnesota research over the years of any segment of I-29 being actively studied in Minnesota, aside from what appeared in the WW2-era years.  And that was well north of what the OP posted.  I have not seen or found anything that suggested I-29 in Minnesota versus South Dakota.
Logged

GMoney0805

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 23
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Fargo, North Dakota
  • Last Login: June 08, 2019, 05:04:39 PM
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2019, 04:59:07 PM »

Thanks for the feedback I thought some of the facts seemed a bit sketchy, so I appreciate the clarification.


iPhone
Logged

edwaleni

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 416
  • Last Login: June 16, 2019, 08:29:56 PM
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2019, 02:49:13 PM »

1947 Map.



1957 Revised Map

Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2169
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: June 15, 2019, 04:25:06 PM
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2019, 04:20:47 PM »

Would we have been better off if Interstate 29 had followed the US 75 corridor from Iowa to Canada, instead of the existing route along former US 77 and US 81?
Logged

DandyDan

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 868
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Mason City Iowa
  • Last Login: June 16, 2019, 05:56:56 AM
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2019, 05:37:39 AM »

Would we have been better off if Interstate 29 had followed the US 75 corridor from Iowa to Canada, instead of the existing route along former US 77 and US 81?
South Dakota would indisputably be worse off. I doubt Sioux Falls takes off like it did without I-29, and the same presumably goes for Brookings and Watertown.

If I-29 and I-90 meet in Minnesota, it's in Luverne and I wonder if my parents meet, get married and never leave.
Logged
MORE FUN THAN HUMANLY THOUGHT POSSIBLE

Henry

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4800
  • Age: 49
  • Location: Chicago, IL/Seattle, WA
  • Last Login: June 16, 2019, 11:29:50 PM
    • Henry Watson's Online Freeway
Re: I-29 was originally planned to go through Minnesota?
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2019, 10:45:34 AM »

This is the first time I've ever heard of an I-29 proposal that was not in the Dakotas! Those parts of MN should be glad they got access to it anyway.
Logged
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.