AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The AARoads Wiki is live! Come check it out!

Author Topic: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic  (Read 19260 times)

CoreySamson

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2494
  • ORU Class of '26

  • Age: 20
  • Location: Houston, TX/Tulsa, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 01:22:21 AM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #50 on: December 22, 2021, 07:53:02 PM »

There is a bridge at that crossing. It goes over a creek.
But that bridge was initially designed for traffic, therefore it doesn't qualify for this thread. If not, then any abandoned bridge could qualify.
Logged
My Route Log
My Clinches

Going to be a little less active here from now on due to college.

MCRoads

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1046
  • Only 9,000 posts to go until I win the forum!

  • Age: 21
  • Location: Colorado Springs
  • Last Login: September 21, 2023, 10:58:43 PM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #51 on: December 24, 2021, 06:51:34 PM »

Logged
I build roads on Minecraft. Like, really good roads.
Interstates traveled:
 4/5/10*/11**/12**/15/25*/29*/35(E/W[TX])/40*/44**/49(LA**)/55*/64**/65/66*/70°/71*76(PA*,CO*)/78*°/80*/95°/99(PA**,NY**)

*/** indicates a terminus/termini being traveled
° Indicates a gap (I.E Breezwood, PA.)

more room plz

tolbs17

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 0
  • Age: 21
  • Location: Greenville, NC
  • Last Login: March 31, 2022, 07:24:24 PM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #52 on: December 24, 2021, 07:46:50 PM »

There is a bridge at that crossing. It goes over a creek.
But that bridge was initially designed for traffic, therefore it doesn't qualify for this thread. If not, then any abandoned bridge could qualify.
Alright, the Bridge Tar River Trail qualifies.
Logged

jakeroot

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15833
  • 日本標準時

  • Age: 27
  • Location: Uruma-shi, Japan
  • Last Login: Today at 12:02:39 AM
    • Flickr
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #53 on: December 26, 2021, 08:26:00 PM »

There is a bridge at that crossing. It goes over a creek.
But that bridge was initially designed for traffic, therefore it doesn't qualify for this thread. If not, then any abandoned bridge could qualify.
Alright, the Bridge Tar River Trail qualifies.

That one carries pedestrian traffic. This thread is about bridges that carry non-mammal "things" (like barrels (above) or water).

ErmineNotyours

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1116
  • Age: 56
  • Location: Renton, Washington
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 11:19:04 PM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #54 on: December 27, 2021, 09:02:59 PM »

Irrigation canal over I-82 in Kennewick, WA.  Presumably the canal was there before the freeway.

https://goo.gl/maps/pnd3vAwwusLxWNLq7
Logged

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 19234
  • Nit picker of unprecedented pedantry

  • Age: 33
  • Location: Norman, OK...?
  • Last Login: Today at 01:22:16 AM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards
Logged
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

catch22

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 417
  • Location: SE Michigan
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 08:17:06 AM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #56 on: December 28, 2021, 03:37:02 PM »

Pipeline bridge spanning the Ohio Turnpike.

https://goo.gl/maps/rgMVnycoBFWEYEMK6
Logged

Bitmapped

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1139
  • Location: Morgantown, WV
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 02:32:13 PM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #57 on: December 28, 2021, 06:18:46 PM »

Smith Dairy has a pipeline structure that carries ice cream mix between its milk and ice cream plants in Orrvillle, Ohio. It crosses over the intersection of Vine Street and Church Street, and even has a mount for a 4-way beacon attached to the side although I've never seen a signal mounted off it.

GMSV: https://goo.gl/maps/6X5jGGvRBUYzm4KV7
Logged

skluth

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3250
  • Age: 67
  • Location: Palm Springs, CA
  • Last Login: September 06, 2023, 12:18:37 AM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #58 on: December 29, 2021, 05:06:47 PM »

There's this pipeline suspension bridge over the Mississippi
Many log flumes are bridges
It's not really traffic if it's animals, is it?

Logged

MCRoads

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1046
  • Only 9,000 posts to go until I win the forum!

  • Age: 21
  • Location: Colorado Springs
  • Last Login: September 21, 2023, 10:58:43 PM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #59 on: January 01, 2022, 01:39:45 PM »

There's this pipeline suspension bridge over the Mississippi
Many log flumes are bridges
It's not really traffic if it's animals, is it?

That log flume comment actually reminds something. Erie, PA has a roller coaster that crosses a road! This might be in a weird category of technically having traffic, but the traffic is a roller coaster, so I’ll put it here in case anyone finds it interesting.
https://goo.gl/maps/kRQwhAc2mLrdN9Hd9
Logged
I build roads on Minecraft. Like, really good roads.
Interstates traveled:
 4/5/10*/11**/12**/15/25*/29*/35(E/W[TX])/40*/44**/49(LA**)/55*/64**/65/66*/70°/71*76(PA*,CO*)/78*°/80*/95°/99(PA**,NY**)

*/** indicates a terminus/termini being traveled
° Indicates a gap (I.E Breezwood, PA.)

more room plz

bwana39

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1759
  • Location: Near Texarkana TX
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 08:41:35 PM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #60 on: June 25, 2023, 10:30:30 PM »

Makes me think of this or this.

The messed up one doesn't have a bridge as best I can tell. It is, however less than two miles from my house.
Logged
Let's build what we need as economically as possible.

Viridiscalculus

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 9
  • Location: Takoma Park, Maryland
  • Last Login: November 05, 2023, 11:04:18 PM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #61 on: June 26, 2023, 09:31:19 PM »

The Union Arch Bridge in Cabin John, Maryland, was originally designed only for Washington Aqueduct. However, vehicle traffic started using the bridge soon after it was completed in 1864.
Logged

Big John

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4182
  • Age: 56
  • Last Login: Today at 03:11:28 AM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #62 on: June 26, 2023, 09:38:08 PM »

Makes me think of this or this.
It shows a location 1/2 mile from me.
The messed up one doesn't have a bridge as best I can tell. It is, however less than two miles from my house.
Logged

Chris19001

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 209
  • Location: Abington, PA
  • Last Login: December 02, 2023, 11:26:42 AM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #63 on: July 07, 2023, 01:08:03 PM »

Its certainly debatable whether it qualifies as a full bridge, but CA-190 has this for the aquaduct near Springville:
https://www.google.com/maps/@36.1603856,-118.718301,3a,64.4y,207.68h,94.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSEyGosPTE3KRb6MRDYdPTA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
Logged

fhmiii

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 187
  • Age: 42
  • Location: Kansas City, MO
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 04:31:46 PM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #64 on: July 11, 2023, 11:53:51 AM »

I have no idea what the genesis of this bridge is, but adjacent to Holmes Street over I-670 in Kansas City is a bridge structure.  I can't find anything about it.  My guess is maybe some utility lines cross here?  Or perhaps it was designed as a pedestrian bridge but then never used?

https://goo.gl/maps/4jr1ugYafxCHzGeK7

There are actually several such structures across I-670, so my best guess is utility lines.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2023, 11:57:27 AM by fhmiii »
Logged

catch22

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 417
  • Location: SE Michigan
  • Last Login: December 04, 2023, 08:17:06 AM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #65 on: July 12, 2023, 08:05:27 AM »

I have no idea what the genesis of this bridge is, but adjacent to Holmes Street over I-670 in Kansas City is a bridge structure.  I can't find anything about it.  My guess is maybe some utility lines cross here?  Or perhaps it was designed as a pedestrian bridge but then never used?

https://goo.gl/maps/4jr1ugYafxCHzGeK7

There are actually several such structures across I-670, so my best guess is utility lines.

Retired AT&T Communications ("Long Lines") guy here.

This is just a guess, but on the north side of I-670 one block west of here lies a large building at 1425 Oak Street.  This is AT&T's long distance switching center for Kansas City (and other telecom providers too, since the Bell System breakup).  Since the freeway passes so close to the building, this bridge could easily be the rerouted cable conduit path from the building to points south.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2023, 08:09:37 AM by catch22 »
Logged

bulldog1979

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 903
  • Age: 44
  • Last Login: Today at 03:40:29 AM
Re: Bridges that were designed to carry no traffic
« Reply #66 on: July 17, 2023, 01:58:37 PM »

On M-35 south of Palmer, Michigan, there is a pipeline to carry tailings from the Empire Mine out to the tailings basins. This structure carries the pipeline over the highway.

In the city of Marquette, the coal unloader crosses over Lake Shore Boulevard south of the LS&I Ore Dock in the Upper Harbor, carrying the conveyors to move the coal from freighters to the site of the now-former Presque Isle Power Plant.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.