The Worst of Road Signs

Started by Scott5114, September 21, 2010, 04:01:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

mrsman

#5550
Quote from: Brandon on July 28, 2020, 08:24:02 PM
Quote from: STLmapboy on July 28, 2020, 07:06:16 PM
Anyone else think the font CA uses on I-5 San Clemente new signs is a bit squished?

The crown jewel  :rolleyes: being this sign at the CA-1/I-5 split. The first letter size in particular is agonizing.

They're bad, but for this thread...

Quote from: Scott5114 on September 21, 2010, 04:01:21 AM
Post the worst, most ineptly put together pieces of crap in your state. Not just "oh, it's in Clearview", "wrong type of shield", or "it's a bubble shield" or anything like that. We're talking pure, unadulterated suck here. Stuff that makes you wonder what they were thinking. Stuff that should only result from a night of binge drinking at the sign shop. Like this!



Again, "Post the worst, most ineptly put together pieces of crap in your state. Not just "oh, it's in Clearview", "wrong type of shield", or "it's a bubble shield" or anything like that. We're talking pure, unadulterated suck here. Stuff that makes you wonder what they were thinking. Stuff that should only result from a night of binge drinking at the sign shop."
The first sign is not that bad as its just Clearview.

But the second sign is pretty bad.  It may not meet the "pure suck" that this thread desires, but its pretty ugly.

Also, shame on Caltrans D12 for not placing Los Angeles as a control.  There is PLENTY of room on this sign to sign for both Santa Ana and Los Angeles

[Los Angeles used to be the NB control along the entire freeway starting from Downtown San Diego.  D12 changed it within southern Orange County to Santa Ana.  IMO this change was wrong.  At the very least on the larger signs, you can use both Santa Ana and Los Angeles.]


Eth

Quote from: Big John on July 28, 2020, 10:18:56 PM
Quote from: csw on July 28, 2020, 09:12:52 PM
Quote from: STLmapboy on July 28, 2020, 07:06:16 PM
Anyone else think the font CA uses on I-5 San Clemente new signs is a bit squished?
If you think this is problematic, then never visit Georgia.
They are phasing those out, if there are any left.

We've been working on it for about 12 years or so now, but at a guess I'd say the old Series D signs still make up probably at least a quarter of what's out there.

Scott5114

Quote from: STLmapboy on July 28, 2020, 07:06:16 PM
Anyone else think the font CA uses on I-5 San Clemente new signs is a bit squished?

Quote from: mrsman on July 29, 2020, 07:43:49 AM
The first sign is not that bad as its just Clearview.

Actually, that's chocolate Series C.

Quote
The crown jewel  :rolleyes: being this sign at the CA-1/I-5 split. The first letter size in particular is agonizing.

And that's the infamous 3/4 error. Definitely gross, but all-too-common.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

Brandon

Quote from: mrsman on July 29, 2020, 07:43:49 AM
Quote from: Brandon on July 28, 2020, 08:24:02 PM
Quote from: STLmapboy on July 28, 2020, 07:06:16 PM
Anyone else think the font CA uses on I-5 San Clemente new signs is a bit squished?

The crown jewel  :rolleyes: being this sign at the CA-1/I-5 split. The first letter size in particular is agonizing.

They're bad, but for this thread...

Quote from: Scott5114 on September 21, 2010, 04:01:21 AM
Post the worst, most ineptly put together pieces of crap in your state. Not just "oh, it's in Clearview", "wrong type of shield", or "it's a bubble shield" or anything like that. We're talking pure, unadulterated suck here. Stuff that makes you wonder what they were thinking. Stuff that should only result from a night of binge drinking at the sign shop. Like this!



Again, "Post the worst, most ineptly put together pieces of crap in your state. Not just "oh, it's in Clearview", "wrong type of shield", or "it's a bubble shield" or anything like that. We're talking pure, unadulterated suck here. Stuff that makes you wonder what they were thinking. Stuff that should only result from a night of binge drinking at the sign shop."
The first sign is not that bad as its just Clearview.

I've seen the infamous CraIG CoUntY sign up close and personal.  It sure as hell isn't clearview, it's just majorly fucked up.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

Ned Weasel

Quote from: Brandon on July 30, 2020, 06:19:05 AM
I've seen the infamous CraIG CoUntY sign up close and personal.  It sure as hell isn't clearview, it's just majorly fucked up.

I saw it in person at least a couple of times before it got replaced.  I was tempted to take a selfie with it, but I decided against it.
"I was raised by a cup of coffee." - Strong Bad imitating Homsar

Disclaimer: Views I express are my own and don't reflect any employer or associated entity.

jeffandnicole

Quote from: Scott5114 on July 29, 2020, 04:27:52 PM
Quote from: STLmapboy on July 28, 2020, 07:06:16 PM
The crown jewel  :rolleyes: being this sign at the CA-1/I-5 split. The first letter size in particular is agonizing.

And that's the infamous 3/4 error. Definitely gross, but all-too-common.

It is also slightly off centered, as if the S in Santa was an add-on after the fact.

jakeroot

Quote from: Brandon on July 30, 2020, 06:19:05 AM
Quote from: mrsman on July 29, 2020, 07:43:49 AM
Quote from: Brandon on July 28, 2020, 08:24:02 PM
Quote from: STLmapboy on July 28, 2020, 07:06:16 PM
Anyone else think the font CA uses on I-5 San Clemente new signs is a bit squished?

The crown jewel  :rolleyes: being this sign at the CA-1/I-5 split. The first letter size in particular is agonizing.

They're bad, but for this thread...

Quote from: Scott5114 on September 21, 2010, 04:01:21 AM
Post the worst, most ineptly put together pieces of crap in your state. Not just "oh, it's in Clearview", "wrong type of shield", or "it's a bubble shield" or anything like that. We're talking pure, unadulterated suck here. Stuff that makes you wonder what they were thinking. Stuff that should only result from a night of binge drinking at the sign shop. Like this!



Again, "Post the worst, most ineptly put together pieces of crap in your state. Not just "oh, it's in Clearview", "wrong type of shield", or "it's a bubble shield" or anything like that. We're talking pure, unadulterated suck here. Stuff that makes you wonder what they were thinking. Stuff that should only result from a night of binge drinking at the sign shop."
The first sign is not that bad as its just Clearview.

I've seen the infamous CraIG CoUntY sign up close and personal.  It sure as hell isn't clearview, it's just majorly fucked up.

He was referring to the first sign in STLmapboy's post (the "a bit squished" link). Though he did misidentify Series C as Clearview.

Eth

Quote from: jakeroot on July 30, 2020, 04:36:33 PM
Quote from: Brandon on July 30, 2020, 06:19:05 AM
Quote from: mrsman on July 29, 2020, 07:43:49 AM
Quote from: Brandon on July 28, 2020, 08:24:02 PM
Quote from: STLmapboy on July 28, 2020, 07:06:16 PM
Anyone else think the font CA uses on I-5 San Clemente new signs is a bit squished?

The crown jewel  :rolleyes: being this sign at the CA-1/I-5 split. The first letter size in particular is agonizing.

They're bad, but for this thread...

Quote from: Scott5114 on September 21, 2010, 04:01:21 AM
Post the worst, most ineptly put together pieces of crap in your state. Not just "oh, it's in Clearview", "wrong type of shield", or "it's a bubble shield" or anything like that. We're talking pure, unadulterated suck here. Stuff that makes you wonder what they were thinking. Stuff that should only result from a night of binge drinking at the sign shop. Like this!



Again, "Post the worst, most ineptly put together pieces of crap in your state. Not just "oh, it's in Clearview", "wrong type of shield", or "it's a bubble shield" or anything like that. We're talking pure, unadulterated suck here. Stuff that makes you wonder what they were thinking. Stuff that should only result from a night of binge drinking at the sign shop."
The first sign is not that bad as its just Clearview.

I've seen the infamous CraIG CoUntY sign up close and personal.  It sure as hell isn't clearview, it's just majorly fucked up.

He was referring to the first sign in STLmapboy's post (the "a bit squished" link). Though he did misidentify Series C as Clearview.

Actually you've all misidentified it; it's Series D*. Trust me, as a Georgian, I know what mixed-case Series D on a BGS looks like.



* Well, okay, the lowercase Cs in "Pacific" might be Series C. And that sort of mix-and-match might actually bolster the sign's credibility for this thread...

Scott5114

You're right, it is D, not C as I had written (I was uncertain between the two but went with C in my post). However, the spotting guide you made there uses the vanilla FHWA glyphs, versus the chocolate ones the actual sign uses (thus why the "c" doesn't match).
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

csw

Most of the quasi-cutout style markers in Roanoke look pretty good, but there are a few assemblies like this one that really stick out awfully.

J3ebrules

Oh look, a rejected US Shield someone picked off the floor at a 1961 meeting on MUTCD revisions!
Counting the cars on the New Jersey Turnpike - they’ve all come to look for America! (Simon & Garfunkel)

KEK Inc.

Take the road less traveled.

hotdogPi

Looks like a typical unisign. The arrow on the top sign, plus the switching of the destinations, may be atypical, but it doesn't look that bad. I don't really see anything wrong, unless the yield sign is blocked from certain angles.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

formulanone

Quote from: csw on August 18, 2020, 09:16:42 PM
Most of the quasi-cutout style markers in Roanoke look pretty good, but there are a few assemblies like this one that really stick out awfully.

Looks like clip art to me.

Scott5114

Quote from: KEK Inc. on August 21, 2020, 07:21:14 AM


What the shit is this?

Qualifies for thread–what else would cause that arrow to be where it is other than a night of binge-drinking at the sign shop?

That 130 shield looks pretty gross too.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

GaryA

Quote from: Scott5114 on August 21, 2020, 02:49:02 PM
Quote from: KEK Inc. on August 21, 2020, 07:21:14 AM


What the shit is this?

Qualifies for thread–what else would cause that arrow to be where it is other than a night of binge-drinking at the sign shop?

That 130 shield looks pretty gross too.

If you look at the older shapshots in GSV, in 2011 and before (nothing available between 2011 and now), it was a similar sign, but the "San Jose" had a left-pointing arrow (and the same 38 mileage).  So presumably the sign had to be replaced (fire, accident, or any other reason) and they left even the room for the arrow off of the replacement sign.  The older sign also had an even stranger CA-130 sign -- neither that nor the current one are Caltrans-produced, since this isn't Caltrans-maintained.  (GSV here: https://goo.gl/maps/YsdGzebHvo5Sdkby7 , where Mines Rd meets "CA-130")

Scott5114

So it's wrong, too? I had assumed since there was no arrow for San Jose that you reached it by turning right as well.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

STLmapboy

Quote from: GaryA on August 21, 2020, 04:34:17 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 21, 2020, 02:49:02 PM
Quote from: KEK Inc. on August 21, 2020, 07:21:14 AM


What the shit is this?

Qualifies for thread–what else would cause that arrow to be where it is other than a night of binge-drinking at the sign shop?

That 130 shield looks pretty gross too.

If you look at the older shapshots in GSV, in 2011 and before (nothing available between 2011 and now), it was a similar sign, but the "San Jose" had a left-pointing arrow (and the same 38 mileage).  So presumably the sign had to be replaced (fire, accident, or any other reason) and they left even the room for the arrow off of the replacement sign.  The older sign also had an even stranger CA-130 sign -- neither that nor the current one are Caltrans-produced, since this isn't Caltrans-maintained.  (GSV here: https://goo.gl/maps/YsdGzebHvo5Sdkby7 , where Mines Rd meets "CA-130")

Well currently the SCU Lightning Complex fire is burning that area, so maybe the sign will be replaced again.
Teenage STL area roadgeek.
Missouri>>>>>Illinois

KEK Inc.

I cropped too much out of the photo.  The sign is at the end of a road at a T junction.  So San Jose is left and Livermore is right. 
Take the road less traveled.

mrsman

Quote from: KEK Inc. on August 21, 2020, 10:50:53 PM
I cropped too much out of the photo.  The sign is at the end of a road at a T junction.  So San Jose is left and Livermore is right.

But with the sign lacking a left arrow near the words "San Jose" many would assume that both Livermore and San Jose are to the right.  This is definitely misleading.

STLmapboy

Get a load of this on I-90 near Sioux Falls. The state route sign is below the control cities, but that's not even the worst of it--the state shield is upside down! :banghead:
Teenage STL area roadgeek.
Missouri>>>>>Illinois

Scott5114

What is with states not knowing which side of their own state is north lately?
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

chays

Even though this is a temporary construction sign, it is still worthy of this thread IMO. Just south of downtown Orlando, I haven't been able to get a good picture of this so here's a GSV shot.

https://www.google.com/maps/@28.5182599,-81.3870197,3a,19y,38.59h,93.71t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1srd2a68TFGugH7b0fPbIP1A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Scott5114

That's so bad it looks Photoshopped. But it isn't...
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: STLmapboy on August 21, 2020, 07:03:08 PM
Quote from: GaryA on August 21, 2020, 04:34:17 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 21, 2020, 02:49:02 PM
Quote from: KEK Inc. on August 21, 2020, 07:21:14 AM


What the shit is this?

Qualifies for thread–what else would cause that arrow to be where it is other than a night of binge-drinking at the sign shop?

That 130 shield looks pretty gross too.

If you look at the older shapshots in GSV, in 2011 and before (nothing available between 2011 and now), it was a similar sign, but the "San Jose" had a left-pointing arrow (and the same 38 mileage).  So presumably the sign had to be replaced (fire, accident, or any other reason) and they left even the room for the arrow off of the replacement sign.  The older sign also had an even stranger CA-130 sign -- neither that nor the current one are Caltrans-produced, since this isn't Caltrans-maintained.  (GSV here: https://goo.gl/maps/YsdGzebHvo5Sdkby7 , where Mines Rd meets "CA-130")

Well currently the SCU Lightning Complex fire is burning that area, so maybe the sign will be replaced again.

The real answer is that Santa Clara County signs CA 130 from the end of State Maintenance at the Lick Observatory East on San Antonio Valley Road and Del Puerto Canyon Road to the Merced County Line.  I documented the hell out of those signs on one of my trips to CA 130:

https://www.gribblenation.org/2018/01/california-state-route-130-and-lick.html?m=1



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.