News:

See the Forum Status page for any planned Forum maintenance or alerts on Forum outages.

Main Menu

What state has the best looking milage markers?

Started by I-57/Route 66 Fan, August 09, 2026, 12:01:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

kphoger

Quote from: Scott5114 on August 14, 2026, 11:05:40 PMThat's just the federal MUTCD style.

To be used on federal routes, of course.  :awesomeface:

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.


Brandon

Quote from: GaryV on August 13, 2026, 02:51:19 PM
Quote from: kphoger on August 13, 2026, 02:18:57 PMquarter-mile markers

I saw those recently, I think in Illinois. Not being familiar and not usually seeing fractions, they looked a little weird. But if it saves 20% on signage, why not?


It actually flows from what ISTHA used to use, 1/2-mile mile markers.  So they made them enhanced and added the 1/4 and 3/4 markers.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

Brandon

Quote from: SkyPesos on August 12, 2026, 05:03:34 PM
Quote from: I-55 on August 09, 2026, 02:50:36 PMSome places (Indiana) can't make up their mind or vary by district on placement.
Illinois also only have enhanced mile markers in select districts. D8 has green ones in the St Louis Metro East with both median and side placement, and D9 has blue ones on the sides along I-57. I don't recall seeing them in the other districts.

District 2 uses them on US-20 around Rockford.  The caveat being that the US-20 mile markers are based on the US-20 postmiles that start at the Winnebago/Stephenson County line.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

CtrlAltDel

I have to admit that I'm partial to the old school D10-3.



I understand the safety reasons behind having mile markers every 0.1 or 0.2 miles, but I find the close repetition distracting, especially with the enhanced versions.
I-290   I-294   I-55   (I-74)   (I-72)   I-40   I-30   US-59   US-190   TX-30   TX-6

architect77

Quote from: kphoger on August 13, 2026, 02:18:57 PM
Quote from: architect77 on August 13, 2026, 02:05:34 PMI don't think they're necessary to be posted every 1/10th of a mile either. Every 2/10ths is more than adequate

I think 0.2 mi. is good too, although I don't complain when they're every 0.1 mi.  I'd be OK with quarter-mile markers instead, which I think some states do.

Quote from: architect77 on August 13, 2026, 02:05:34 PMand a smaller sign with just the digits and perhaps a small shield  are adequate.

I think the shield isn't necessary on every sign.  Once every whole-number or some multiple is good.  In Mexico, the km-markers have the route shield on every fifth one, and that's adequate.

This makes me wonder if the call boxes along interstates in the California desert are still installed and functional. I made 9 trips to Southern Calif. in the 90s before cell phones were commonly used.

There were emergency call boxes on interstates in the Southern Calif. desert every 1 or 2 or 3 miles I can't remember for people who got stranded in the inhospitable environment. I wonder if cell phones rendered them no longer necessary.

ran4sh

Quote from: kphoger on August 12, 2026, 04:59:20 PMEnhanced mile markers on multiplexed surface routes would sure make it easier to know which route's mileage scheme they're following.

... but only if it's done correctly.

I've seen enhanced mile markers on multiplex routes where multiple routes are identified on the sign but the mileage is only correct for one of them.
Center lane merges are the most unsafe thing ever, especially for unfamiliar drivers.

Control cities should be actual cities/places that travelers are trying to reach.

Travel Mapping - Most Traveled: I-40, 20, 10, 5, 95 - Longest Clinched: I-20, 85, 74, 24, 16
Champions - UGA FB '21 '22 - Atlanta Braves '95 '21 - Atlanta MLS '18

kphoger

Quote from: ran4sh on August 23, 2026, 10:35:02 PMI've seen enhanced mile markers on multiplex routes where multiple routes are identified on the sign

:angry:  not happy

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

OCGuy81

Quote from: PNWRoadgeek on August 10, 2026, 03:18:17 AMAll I know is that Oregon definitely doesn't. We just typically slap a small green "MILE (insert mile here)" sign on the side of the highway. Some miles don't even have them.

The closest I've seen is half mile markers on OR-217.

I get frustrated when mile markers randomly reset because you're on a new "Highway" (internal Oregon highway, not the actually marked route)