News:

Cloudflare is enabled due to bots continuing to hammer the Forum.

Main Menu

Ontario's Highways

Started by un1, January 19, 2009, 03:21:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

dvferyance

Quote from: zzcarp on March 11, 2026, 04:19:20 PM
Quote from: andrepoiy on March 11, 2026, 10:07:55 AM
Quote from: zzcarp on March 11, 2026, 01:56:45 AM
Quote from: Great Lakes Roads on March 10, 2026, 05:05:43 AMhttps://news.ontario.ca/en/release/1007099/ontario-taking-next-steps-to-widen-highway-17-between-renfrew-and-arnprior

Good to see that Highway 417 will be extended westwards towards Renfrew!

Then on to the Sault!
Probably never to be honest...
Probably not. The Echo Bay bypass, the Sudbury southwest and southeast bypasses, and the stretch of freeway west of Sudbury past Whitefish to just before the traffic light at DenLou are the only major improvements I've seen in my lifetime on that stretch of Highway 17. Still one can dream.
It should probably be twined though even with at grade intersections


Molandfreak

Highway 17 is a treacherous stretch of nothing between Sault and Sudbury, and it's only going to get worse when the 400 is finished. Twinning would help the situation, but it can only go so far since the government refuses to bump speed limits up from 90 unless it's a full freeway.

Inclusive infrastructure advocate

zzcarp

#1627
Quote from: Molandfreak on April 29, 2026, 09:03:57 PMHighway 17 is a treacherous stretch of nothing between Sault and Sudbury, and it's only going to get worse when the 400 is finished. Twinning would help the situation, but it can only go so far since the government refuses to bump speed limits up from 90 unless it's a full freeway.

Agreed. I drive the stretch between the Sault and Massey every year (plus trips from Espanola to Sudbury). The 90kph speed limit is tough, especially on the one twinned section just east of the Sault. I tend to drive those stretches at about 65mph in the rural areas (105 kph). The OPP doesn't seem to ticket within 20kph over the limit, and I see two types of drivers: ones that prefer to drive 50mph/80kph or less, and those who must be driving 75 or more since they leave me in the dust when they can pass. Twinning, even as an expressway, would make it safer plus provide a redundancy in case of accidents, construction, etc. There really is no parallel route for long stretches through there.
So many miles and so many roads

JREwing78

Quote from: zzcarp on April 29, 2026, 09:15:46 PM
Quote from: Molandfreak on April 29, 2026, 09:03:57 PMHighway 17 is a treacherous stretch of nothing between Sault and Sudbury, and it's only going to get worse when the 400 is finished. Twinning would help the situation, but it can only go so far since the government refuses to bump speed limits up from 90 unless it's a full freeway.

... Twinning, even as an expressway, would make it safer plus provide a redundancy in case of accidents, construction, etc. There really is no parallel route for long stretches through there.

Follow the Only Road!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W1tWRMoiAI

Stephane Dumas

Someone else already mention it I think but the Bradford bypass is now numbered Hwy-425. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_Highway_425

andrepoiy

Quote from: Stephane Dumas on June 22, 2026, 04:27:08 PMSomeone else already mention it I think but the Bradford bypass is now numbered Hwy-425. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_Highway_425

I wonder where that came from, given that Highway 25 is nowhere near that corridor



LilianaUwU

Quote from: andrepoiy on June 23, 2026, 10:07:43 PM
Quote from: Stephane Dumas on June 22, 2026, 04:27:08 PMSomeone else already mention it I think but the Bradford bypass is now numbered Hwy-425. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_Highway_425

I wonder where that came from, given that Highway 25 is nowhere near that corridor

They got inspiration from US 425 I bet.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her, no matter what you think about that.

Great Lakes Roads

-Jay Seaburg

Clinched States (Interstates): AL, AZ, DE, FL, HI, KS, MN, NE, NH, RI, VT, WI

vdeane

Nice to finally see 110 become pervasive on the freeways rather than the special exception, but why is it staged across three months?  That seems really specific for it to simply be a case of taking time to get all the signs installed.

Now if only Québec would get with the program...
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

LilianaUwU

Quote from: vdeane on June 24, 2026, 07:59:10 PMNice to finally see 110 become pervasive on the freeways rather than the special exception, but why is it staged across three months?  That seems really specific for it to simply be a case of taking time to get all the signs installed.

Now if only Québec would get with the program...
To be fair, the speed limit here is already de facto 110 km/h.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her, no matter what you think about that.

cu2010

I mean nobody follows the limits as posted anyways.

Of course, trucks will still be limited to 105...
This is cu2010, reminding you, help control the ugly sign population, don't have your shields spayed or neutered.

Molandfreak

Still quite a disappointment to see the Sudbury bypass left out. As well as other fully-twinned expressways in Northern Ontario.

Inclusive infrastructure advocate

LilianaUwU

Quote from: Molandfreak on June 24, 2026, 10:52:31 PMStill quite a disappointment to see the Sudbury bypass left out. As well as other fully-twinned expressways in Northern Ontario.
The Sudbury bypass isn't full freeway.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her, no matter what you think about that.

Chris

They say that Ontario's freeways were designed for 110 km/h, in fact they were designed for 70 mph and I assume they kept the same design standards after metrication and reduction to 100 km/h?

vdeane

I'm not a fan of "the de facto limit is X, so we don't need a limit increase".  It increases uncertainty for people not from the area and allows for the police to do pretext stops.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

LilianaUwU

Quote from: vdeane on June 25, 2026, 12:50:05 PMI'm not a fan of "the de facto limit is X, so we don't need a limit increase".  It increases uncertainty for people not from the area and allows for the police to do pretext stops.
Yeah, if it's raised to where it's tolerated, there's less room for tolerance but it's much clearer.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her, no matter what you think about that.

Alps

Quote from: LilianaUwU on June 25, 2026, 02:53:39 PM
Quote from: vdeane on June 25, 2026, 12:50:05 PMI'm not a fan of "the de facto limit is X, so we don't need a limit increase".  It increases uncertainty for people not from the area and allows for the police to do pretext stops.
Yeah, if it's raised to where it's tolerated, there's less room for tolerance but it's much clearer.
Unrelated, but in my town we had a 40 km/h road where people easily traveled double that all the time. When they stepped it up to 60 km/h to reflect the actual characteristics of the road, people dropped much closer to 60. Even without additional enforcement, a realistic limit is more acceptable to drivers.

AsphaltPlanet

AsphaltPlanet.ca  Youtube -- Opinions expressed reflect the viewpoints of others.