News:

Check out the AARoads Wiki!

Main Menu

Denver to Salt Lake City

Started by Fcexpress80, April 24, 2009, 02:55:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

corco

The intent is that it serves the Denver to Las Vegas/Los Angeles corridor, shaving a couple hundred miles off of that (compared to I-80 or I-40). I-70 in isolation looks useless, but expand your vision to include I-15 and suddenly it looks like a pretty nice diagonal from Denver to Vegas.

That said, an extension to Reno would be neat


agentsteel53

maybe as a two-lane interstate... US-50 west of Cove Fort is indeed a very lonely highway.  There is no need for it to be four lanes.  To I-15, four lanes makes sense as there is a moderate amount of truck traffic, but past it, no.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Hellfighter

Quote from: corco on January 01, 2010, 04:55:12 PM
The intent is that it serves the Denver to Las Vegas/Los Angeles corridor, shaving a couple hundred miles off of that (compared to I-80 or I-40). I-70 in isolation looks useless, but expand your vision to include I-15 and suddenly it looks like a pretty nice diagonal from Denver to Vegas.

That said, an extension to Reno would be neat

There's an idea, widen US-50 and raise the speed limit to 90!  ;-)

TXtoNJ

Quote from: Hellfighter on January 01, 2010, 04:27:13 PM
I feel that that section of I-70 is wasted because it's not really going anywhere. If they really wanted to make it good, they would extend it to meet up with I-80 west of Reno.

Think of it less as a highway from Denver to anywhere, and more as the fastest way from Los Angeles to Chicago and New York City by road. Then I-70 makes a lot more sense, and fully justifies the expense.

agentsteel53

Quote from: Hellfighter on January 01, 2010, 04:27:13 PM
I feel that that section of I-70 is wasted because it's not really going anywhere. If they really wanted to make it good, they would extend it to meet up with I-80 west of Reno.

the only problem with US-50 west of Salina is the slightly perverse path it takes to Scipio.  Given traffic volumes, the two-lane corridor is perfectly sufficient to Reno.

the part of US-50 that needs an upgrade, badly, is from Reno to the foothills where the current freeway begins.  Also that one intersection with 49 in Placerville.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

sammack

Quote from: Hellfighter on January 01, 2010, 04:27:13 PM
I feel that that section of I-70 is wasted because it's not really going anywhere. If they really wanted to make it good, they would extend it to meet up with I-80 west of Reno.

NV's answer to that, no.

They feel US 50 is adequate for the traffic.

A multi-billion dollar interstate is not going to happen