While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex
Quote from: ITB on June 30, 2025, 10:28:52 PMQuote from: NWI_Irish96 on June 30, 2025, 03:40:48 PMQuote from: silverback1065 on June 30, 2025, 03:33:59 PMQuote from: NWI_Irish96 on June 30, 2025, 10:11:04 AMQuote from: silverback1065 on June 30, 2025, 08:27:41 AMI see the new SR 11 extension is actually happening in Harrison County. Eventually it will shoot straight west to SR 135 from where it currently just ends at Old SR 337.
Which is exactly where IN 11 used to go. Wonder what convinced the state to take the road back.
I think you're mistaken, this is a new terrain roadway. The portion from old 337 to 135 that is incorrectly labeled as SR 11 is the old route. SR 111 is also incorrectly labeled south of SR 211, that section was deleted at the same time as 11 and 337.
Ah, OK. Any idea why? This is a pretty remote area. Not sure what the need for a new roadway is.
Harrison County officials would be more specific, but it appears the purpose of the road is to increase cross-county mobility. Bear in mind that, while the county is predominantly rural, it is home to 39,654 residents as of 2020.
On another matter, it's intriguing to consider if there was a bridge connection over the Ohio River carrying SR 211 from Harrison County to the western suburbs of Louisville. Such a connection would likely bring immense benefits to the county, as the population would boom. In the county's southeast, significant residential development would undoubtedly take place due to the close proximity and easy access to Louisville.
Of course, the chance that a new Ohio River crossing actually gets built is more dream than reality, but it's nice to think about.
Quote from: pderocco on Today at 04:34:21 AMQuote from: Max Rockatansky on Today at 12:25:19 AMQuote from: pderocco on July 01, 2025, 11:37:11 PMQuote from: Max Rockatansky on July 01, 2025, 11:03:09 PMI don't get how all these folks coming out of the Bay Area headed towards Tahoe hasn't discovered that 88 and 89 is the optimal way to get there. Something feels off to me about rushing to Lake Tahoe only on normal people highways like I-80 and US 50.What makes US-395 so scenic, at least between Inyokern and Topaz Lake, is that it is usually in a wide open valley, yielding lots of vistas presided over by majestic mountains. I love 1 of course, but a lot of its views are of empty ocean on one side and trees and bushes on the other, so the best views are lengthwise along the coast. 49 I like primarily for the quaint towns, not so much the views.
While US 395 is a very nice and scenic modern highway, I would hesitate to call it "most scenic in the state." I'm not sure what I would call "most scenic" but stuff like several sections of 1 and 49 come to mind right away in the Caltrans stock.
395 is also beautiful in Oregon, and north of Spokane, but those roads are certainly nowhere near as popular, so wouldn't belong on that list. But then neither does the Nevada part, in my opinion, because it's apparent "popularity" is primarily due to the large local population filling the roads, not tourists. That article was an enthusiastic sales pitch, but I don't know how successful it will be. When I go up there, I want to get past Gardnerville to Reno.
Thing with US 395 is that a lot of that scenery is directly accessible via roads that actually go into it. One thing to look from afar, quite another to drive up stuff like Horseshoe Meadows Road to the vicinity of Kearsarge Pass.
I don't know, I'd have to sit down and think on what I would consider the most scenic highway in this state. I don't know if my answer would come from a road carrying a Route number.
Thing is, there are plenty of relatively short pieces of road that are stunning, like the Feather River Canyon, Sonora Pass, Tioga Pass, Rim of the World, going up into Sequoia from the south, some of CA-299 west of Whiskeytown, etc. What puts CA-1 on the list is that there are hundreds of miles of beauty. US-395, in all four states, is 1300 miles long, and except for 60 miles at the bottom, 40 around Reno, and 200 from Pendleton to Spokane, it's all at least beautiful, and quite a bit of it is unforgettable.
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on Today at 12:25:19 AMQuote from: pderocco on July 01, 2025, 11:37:11 PMQuote from: Max Rockatansky on July 01, 2025, 11:03:09 PMI don't get how all these folks coming out of the Bay Area headed towards Tahoe hasn't discovered that 88 and 89 is the optimal way to get there. Something feels off to me about rushing to Lake Tahoe only on normal people highways like I-80 and US 50.What makes US-395 so scenic, at least between Inyokern and Topaz Lake, is that it is usually in a wide open valley, yielding lots of vistas presided over by majestic mountains. I love 1 of course, but a lot of its views are of empty ocean on one side and trees and bushes on the other, so the best views are lengthwise along the coast. 49 I like primarily for the quaint towns, not so much the views.
While US 395 is a very nice and scenic modern highway, I would hesitate to call it "most scenic in the state." I'm not sure what I would call "most scenic" but stuff like several sections of 1 and 49 come to mind right away in the Caltrans stock.
395 is also beautiful in Oregon, and north of Spokane, but those roads are certainly nowhere near as popular, so wouldn't belong on that list. But then neither does the Nevada part, in my opinion, because it's apparent "popularity" is primarily due to the large local population filling the roads, not tourists. That article was an enthusiastic sales pitch, but I don't know how successful it will be. When I go up there, I want to get past Gardnerville to Reno.
Thing with US 395 is that a lot of that scenery is directly accessible via roads that actually go into it. One thing to look from afar, quite another to drive up stuff like Horseshoe Meadows Road to the vicinity of Kearsarge Pass.
I don't know, I'd have to sit down and think on what I would consider the most scenic highway in this state. I don't know if my answer would come from a road carrying a Route number.
Quote from: hotdogPi on July 01, 2025, 09:46:29 AMIf we use density of water as a baseline like we do for metric units, the "0.591 liters" would become 591 grams, or 1.3 pounds as the base unit of mass.
Quote from: kphoger on July 01, 2025, 09:30:56 AMDecimega- should mean 100,000 of something.
Decakilo- should mean 10,000 of something.
And/or we should bring back the myriad.
Quote from: LilianaUwU on July 01, 2025, 12:32:02 PMQuote from: mgk920 on July 01, 2025, 12:26:05 PMWith the way things have been going recently in Canada, should some of those western provinces eventually gain independence and then join the USA
Saying this shit on Canada Day? May as well tell every Canadian to go fuck themselves.
Quote from: paulthemapguy on July 01, 2025, 09:38:55 AMJuly 2: Post the junction of a US highway with a 0 in the tens place and a US highway with a 1 in the tens place
QuoteI am open to opinions on what Seasons 5 and 6 will be based on. Feel free to chime in on what you think those challenges should be in September through December.