News:

The forum email is operational but DNS settings are incomplete. I'm working at restoring the notification functionality.
- Alex

Main Menu

I-344 I-240 I-335 Signage

Started by jdingus, May 09, 2024, 12:34:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Scott5114

Quote from: Bobby5280 on January 22, 2025, 10:47:08 PMI guess they had to make the I-344 marker too friggin' big so they would be sure it would cover up the old Kilpatrick OTA logo.

uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef


Bobby5280

Ugh. :banghead:

The installers had one job...

Scott5114

Five o'clock hit and they only had so much green reflective tape on them, I guess. (They did go back and fix it after a few days, and those signs have since been replaced entirely.)
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

jdingus

The whole reason they numbered the JKT I-344 was the expansion down to the tri-city connector. 344 will connect to I-44 in the future.

Also Airport Road does need to be 240. They Might extend it to El Reno one day. Personally they should have just left 44 at I-35 in 1982. Kept 240 around the city.

TXtoNJ

Quote from: CoreySamson on January 16, 2025, 03:54:38 PM
Quote from: The Ghostbuster on January 16, 2025, 12:05:49 PMSince the 240 extension has not been signed yet, and 335 and 344 have been, I wonder if the 240 extension will remain an unsigned route.
The only reason that I-240 hasn't been signed yet is that ODOT hasn't gotten around to it (while OTA has completed their stuff regarding 335 and 344). I am pretty sure that ODOT won't leave a route half-unsigned. Patience, young Padawan.

I'm fairly certain that's exactly something ODOT would do.

The Ghostbuster

Then should existing Interstate 44 south of the Interstate 240 interchange have remained without a highway designation, or should it have had a different designation, such as Interstate 33?

Bobby5280

I don't see I-44 getting re-named to something else because of planned ACCESS Oklahoma projects. There is no reason to do that anyway. The proposed Tri-City Connector turnpike would begin just East of the current I-335/I-240/SH-152 mash-up. It will extend South around the West and South sides of Will Rogers World Airport and merge into I-44 somewhere North of the Canadian River. The only potential overlap that could happen is crossing the Canadian River.

It would make sense to extend the I-344 designation along the Tri-City Connector in order to give I-240 a more logical terminus at its West end. The current West terminus sucks.

There's no telling what the East-West Connector designation could be. If OTA insists on a 3XX name and Interstate designation they'll be stuck having to extend the I-344 designation along that turnpike too. I think it would make more sense giving the East-West Connector a different I-x35 or I-x44 number.

The only way I could see something like "I-33" being applied to the OKC-Wichita Falls segment of I-44 is if it connected to another new corridor in Texas. It's getting into fictional territory, but the US-281 corridor running North of San Antonio could be a serious relief route for I-35. US-281 deserves to be Interstate quality from San Antonio up to Johnson City at the minimum. It could go so far as Lampasas where it could connected into proposed I-14. Extending up to Wichita Falls is a pretty big leap though.

plain

Quote from: Scott5114 on January 23, 2025, 06:30:33 AM
Quote from: Bobby5280 on January 22, 2025, 10:47:08 PMI guess they had to make the I-344 marker too friggin' big so they would be sure it would cover up the old Kilpatrick OTA logo.



Had to come back to this. That looks like a FL Toll Route on its side  :spin:
Newark born, Richmond bred

Bobby5280

The 74A route marker looks like a slot loading CD player with a disc poking out of it.

Scott5114

uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

algorerhythms


abqtraveler

Quote from: rte66man on January 22, 2025, 10:28:47 PMSouthbound Broadway Extension:

That is a disproportionately large I-344 shield!
2-d Interstates traveled:  4, 5, 8, 10, 15, 20, 24, 25, 27, 29, 35, 39, 40, 41, 43, 45, 49, 55, 57, 64, 65, 66, 69, 70, 71, 72, 74, 75, 76(E), 77, 78, 81, 83, 84(W), 85, 87(N), 89, 90, 91, 93, 94, 95

2-d Interstates Clinched:  12, 22, 30, 37, 44, 59, 80, 84(E), 86(E), 238, H1, H2, H3, H201

Bobby5280

The only good thing I can say about the Interstate shield on that sign is at least it's a proper state name shield with smaller Series C numerals that fit more comfortably in the space. Neutered shields with oversized Series D numerals just look stupid as hell.

WillWeaverRVA

Quote from: rte66man on January 22, 2025, 10:28:47 PMSouthbound Broadway Extension:


Holy crap, it looks like one of the enormous 270 and 495 shields on the Beltway.
Will Weaver
WillWeaverRVA Photography | Twitter

"But how will the oxen know where to drown if we renumber the Oregon Trail?" - NE2

jdingus

Still no I=240 signs on Airport Road. They also updated the BGS on I-44 at Airport Road still says OK-152

The Ghostbuster

Maybe they should drop the Interstate 240 extension and leave the roadway OK 152. It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world to do.

Scott5114

#116
Quote from: The Ghostbuster on February 25, 2025, 03:57:59 PMMaybe they should drop the Interstate 240 extension and leave the roadway OK 152. It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world to do.

Maybe they should stripe the lane lines with Swiss MissĀ® vanilla pudding. It also wouldn't be the worst thing in the world to do (though it would be a lot closer).
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

PColumbus73

Quote from: WillWeaverRVA on February 21, 2025, 09:05:28 AM
Quote from: rte66man on January 22, 2025, 10:28:47 PMSouthbound Broadway Extension:


Holy crap, it looks like one of the enormous 270 and 495 shields on the Beltway.

Guess it's not the worst sign that's come out of Oklahoma



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.