News:

The revamped Archives section of AARoads is live.

Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
Great Lakes and Ohio Valley / Re: Madison Area
Last post by hobsini2 - Today at 04:13:41 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on Today at 12:55:29 PM
Quote from: The Ghostbuster on June 30, 2025, 02:58:04 PMStoughton Rd. was originally called the East Madison Beltline, but I believe that name died out pretty quickly. As much as I'd like US 51 to be completely freeway between US 12/18 and Interstates 39/90/94, I realize it will never happen (due to the existence of the forementioned Interstates).

Neither WisDOT nor the feds will allow more interchanges to be added along I-19/90/94 nor WI 30.  It is a pure bypass highway system for longer distance regional and through traffic.  Stoughton Rd already has oodles of local traffic on it (with calls from others upthread in here for more lanes and local access interchanges).  As long as personal vehicles remain popular, that traffic will continue to increase (I don't want to be here when the need for SERIOUS upgrades for its interchange at the Beltline comes due).

Mike
Between Hwy N and Hwy V, where could one build an interchange on 39/90/94?  Of the existing bridges that do not have one, some of them have problems to being an interchange.

Hwy MN - too close to the Weigh Station
Hwy AB - too short a road but it does already have an interchange with 12/18
Sigglekow Rd - potential and does have an interchange with 51
Femrite Dr - too close to 12/18
Buckeye Rd - potential
Cottage Grove Rd - too close to 94/30
Milwaukee St - to close to 94/30
Commercial Ave - to close to 94/30
Lien Rd - too minor
Hansen Rd - potential
Hoepker Rd - potential
River Rd / Windsor Rd - potential
Cuba Valley Rd - potential
#2
General Highway Talk / Re: Metric Signs
Last post by 1995hoo - Today at 04:01:36 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on Today at 03:11:52 PMThe UK is the only country in the world that posts 'MPH' speed limits with red circles.  Ireland converted theirs to km/h  a decade or two ago.  Converting the Canadian 'km/h' signs to red circles will eliminate a possible confusion with square 'MPH' signs and state route markers in the USA.  BTW, speed limit signs en Mexico are also red circles, but they do say "km/h" at their bottoms.

Arguably, Canada's signs already distinguish themselves from US-specification signs because they say "MAXIMUM" rather than "SPEED LIMIT." There would be a case to be made that the different wording should be one way of calling the motorist's attention to the fact that the sign uses a different unit of measure (never mind the practical absurdity of thinking that a sign reading "MAXIMUM 110" means you can go 110 mph).



Quote from: kphoger on Today at 03:35:49 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on Today at 12:26:05 PMI would make several reasonable adjustments in the MUTCD
Quote from: mgk920 on Today at 03:11:52 PMConverting the Canadian 'km/h' signs to red circles will eliminate a possible confusion

The MUTCD does not govern road signs in Canada.

His point was that there is a secessionist movement in Alberta that wants the province to apply for statehood. That sort of speculation isn't totally unprecedented. I recall during the lead-up to the 1995 Quebec referendum, at least one of the premiers in the Atlantic provinces suggested that if the "oui" vote prevailed, his province might have to explore statehood.

So he was speculating on what to do with road signs if the Alberta secession did come to pass.
#3
General Highway Talk / Re: State Clinches - Various C...
Last post by Bruce - Today at 03:44:17 PM
An update:

Lived in (1): WA
Set foot in (32+DC): WA, OR, ID, CA, HI, MD, (DC), VA, IL, UT, MI, OH, NJ, NY, MA, NV, AZ, UT, WY, MT, SD, IA, NE, MO, KS, OK, TX, NM, IN, MN, WI, CO
Spent the night in (26+DC): WA, OR, CA, HI, MD, (DC), VA, MI, OH, NY, MA, ID, NV, UT, WY, MT, SD, KS, OK, TX, NM, NE, IN, MN, WI, MO, CO
Spent multiple consecutive nights in (14+DC): WA, CA, HI, MD, (DC), VA, OH, NY, MA, UT, MT, SD, TX, MN, CO
Driven a vehicle in (20): WA, OR, CA, ID, NV, AZ, UT, WY, MT, SD, IA, NE, MO, KS, OK, TX, NM, MN, WI, IL, CO
Airplane takeoffs/landings (13): WA, HI, CA, UT, IL, MN, TX, MI, VA, MD, NJ, MA, CO
Airport layovers only (0)
Ridden a train or tram (18+DC): WA, UT, (DC), MD, VA, CA, OR, UT, IL, MI, NJ, NY, MA, MO, OK, TX, MN, WI, CO
Ridden a bus (17+DC): WA, OR, CA, ID, VA, (DC), MD, MI, OH, NJ, NY, CT, MA, TX, NM, NE, WI, CO
Ridden a boat or ferry (3): WA, OR, NY
Ridden a roller coaster in (1): ID

Adding Canada:

Set foot in (4): BC, AB, ON, QC
Spent the night in (4): BC, AB, ON, QC
Spent multiple consecutive nights in (4): BC, AB, QC, ON
Driven a vehicle in (3): BC, AB, QC
Airplane takeoffs/landings (3): BC, QC, ON
Ridden a train or tram (4): BC, AB, ON, QC
Ridden a bus (4): BC, AB, ON, QC
Ridden a boat or ferry (1): BC
#4
General Highway Talk / Re: 40th Anniversary of US-66 ...
Last post by Scott5114 - Today at 03:43:05 PM
Quote from: Molandfreak on Today at 04:57:34 AM
Quote from: Jim on June 30, 2025, 09:56:26 PMI'm definitely not trying to argue that there should be a single number between every pair of major U.S. cities.  If it ever was specifically useful it's much less so now with everyone carrying an device around capable of getting you from anywhere to anywhere, turn by turn.  Was a desire to have single number on a Chicago-LA route the reason the route was given a single number when the US system was created?  I assumed so but maybe that just happened to be where 60, which became 66, was proposed.
So, what exactly are you saying? Given that 66 was already dead in California and Illinois, how would you go about forcing IDOT and Caltrans to accept extensions of a redundant route that had just been eliminated? If you are saying it should have just been kept as it was in 1985, how are you going to get around the policy changes with NMDOT that eliminated US 80 and ghosted US 85–or would it effectively be ghosted within New Mexico's borders anyway?

I mean if you really wanted to do this, you could write a federal law that required it, and then said if they left it unsigned they'd lose all their federal highway funding.

That would be really stupid and over the top, mind you, but that's how you'd force states to accept it.
#5
General Highway Talk / Re: 40th Anniversary of US-66 ...
Last post by Jim - Today at 03:41:13 PM
"Would remain useful" better stated as "would have remained useful" if it never went away in the first place.  Obviously others disagree and that's fine, especially since it's been a done deal, as the thread title reminds us, for 4 decades.
#6
General Highway Talk / Re: Metric Signs
Last post by Scott5114 - Today at 03:37:17 PM
Quote from: kphoger on Today at 09:54:13 AMJust ignore measurements of time.

I do this a lot, and it seems to make people really upset and say things like "You were supposed to be there at six, where were you?"

Quote from: mgk920 on Today at 12:26:05 PMWith the way things have been going recently in Canada, should some of those western provinces eventually gain independence and then join the USA . . .

With the way things have been going in America, I think it's more likely that it will have fewer states rather than more in the future.
#7
General Highway Talk / Re: Metric Signs
Last post by kphoger - Today at 03:35:49 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on Today at 12:26:05 PMI would make several reasonable adjustments in the MUTCD
Quote from: mgk920 on Today at 03:11:52 PMConverting the Canadian 'km/h' signs to red circles will eliminate a possible confusion

The MUTCD does not govern road signs in Canada.
#8
Off-Topic / Re: Random Thoughts
Last post by Scott5114 - Today at 03:31:59 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on June 25, 2025, 08:41:24 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on June 25, 2025, 12:46:05 PMI was washing my hands and I noted how the cold tap water isn't particularly cold with the hot weather we're having.

That was something I noticed last year, during my first summer in Las Vegas, which was the hottest on record. For most of July and August, the two tap water options were hot and warm. (And running the water long enough to clear the lines didn't really seem to affect it much, so I'm guessing it was coming off the mains that warm.)

It will be interesting to see, once we hit the really bad part of summer (we haven't gotten much above 110 yet), if that happens again where I live now, which is a few hundred feet higher in elevation than where I was last year. This part of the valley is high enough that it's usually about 3°F cooler than the Strip, and 6° cooler than Nellis.

I did the dishes yesterday and sure enough, warm water out of the cold line. So it's probably just the water temperature in Lake Mead, or whatever sort of storage they use for treated water after it's pulled out of the lake.
#9
General Highway Talk / Re: Metric Signs
Last post by SEWIGuy - Today at 03:30:05 PM
Western Canada isn't going to become part of the United States.

The United States isn't changing its speed limit sign.
#10
Pacific Southwest / Headlines About California Hig...
Last post by cahwyguy - Today at 03:21:59 PM
Even in retirement, a new month means it is time for Highway Headlines. Here are your headlines for the month of June 2025.

Retirement Post: https://cahighways.org/wordpress/?p=17262
Headlines about California Highways - June 2025: https://cahighways.org/wordpress/?p=17311

Ready, Set, Discuss

Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.