News:

The AARoads Wiki is live! Come check it out!

Main Menu

Toll roads and HOT Lanes

Started by Bruce, May 12, 2015, 03:23:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bruce

Might as well start a topic for what has become an emerging issue in the Seattle area. More state highways are being converted into toll roads and HOT lanes (with or without major new infrastructure that justifies it) and people are mad about it.

All of the toll facilities in Washington are operated by WSDOT and use the Good-to-Go pass system. Only the Tacoma Narrows Bridge has a toll plaza where cash can be used, otherwise drivers without passes have to pay a higher fee in the mail (which comes with late fees that have been very controversial).

One can also include the state-run ferry system in this list, as they are part of the state highway system (carrying route designations since 1994) and have fares of their own.

Current Toll Roads in Washington (As of May 2015)






Route/NameTypeLengthTerminiToll rates for average carOpenedNotes
SR 16 Tacoma Narrows BridgeToll bridge0.5 miGig Harbor
Tacoma
$4.50 (Good-to-Go!)
$5.50 (Cash)
$6.50 (Mail)
July 2007Eastbound span only
SR 167 HOT LanesHOT Lane10 miSW 15th Street in Auburn
I-405 in Renton
$0.50 to $9.00May 2008 (pilot)
2013
Double white lines partially removed in 2014;
Extension south to Pierce County to open in 2017
SR 520 Floating BridgeToll bridge1.4 miSR 513 in Seattle
92nd Avenue NE in Clyde Hill
$1.20 to $3.80 (Good-to-Go)
$2.80 to $5.40 (Mail)
December 2011Bridge was tolled from 1963 to 1979 with toll booths (converted into the former Evergreen Point bus station until 2014);
Tolls to be used to fund $1.2 billion towards the replacement floating bridge

Future Toll Roads in Washington (Under construction or approved)

Proposed Toll Roads in Washington



I-405 Express Toll Lanes

Here's a video from WSDOT explaning the I-405 Express Toll Lane project, which includes a unique "Flex Pass" that allows drivers to switch between being charged as a single-occupant vehicle and using the lanes for free with a qualifying (3+ occupant) carpool.



jakeroot

Looking forward to the day when I can drive to Seattle without traffic. That's priceless as far as I'm concerned.

Bruce

Also, speaking of toll roads, here's what SR 520 looks like during rush hour even with tolls:


SR 520 Floating Bridge during rush hour by SounderBruce, on Flickr

mrsman

Quote from: Bruce on May 14, 2015, 10:53:29 PM
Also, speaking of toll roads, here's what SR 520 looks like during rush hour even with tolls:


SR 520 Floating Bridge during rush hour by SounderBruce, on Flickr

Can you tell us whether this was morning or afternoon rush hour and which direction was busier, E or W?

Also, bridges are a little different from HOT lanes because there are very few work arounds.  They will be busy despite tolls.  The tolls are for revenue generating purposes only, not to provide a smooth ride for tollpayers.

THe HOT lanes though do provide an alternative between free and congested and toll and less congested.


Bruce



Quote from: mrsman on May 15, 2015, 08:43:20 AM

Can you tell us whether this was morning or afternoon rush hour and which direction was busier, E or W?

Also, bridges are a little different from HOT lanes because there are very few work arounds.  They will be busy despite tolls.  The tolls are for revenue generating purposes only, not to provide a smooth ride for tollpayers.

THe HOT lanes though do provide an alternative between free and congested and toll and less congested.

This was taken during the afternoon rush hour, with traffic going westbound (Bellevue/Redmond to Seattle) at a near standstill.


mrsman

Quote from: Bruce on May 15, 2015, 01:03:42 PM


Quote from: mrsman on May 15, 2015, 08:43:20 AM

Can you tell us whether this was morning or afternoon rush hour and which direction was busier, E or W?

Also, bridges are a little different from HOT lanes because there are very few work arounds.  They will be busy despite tolls.  The tolls are for revenue generating purposes only, not to provide a smooth ride for tollpayers.

THe HOT lanes though do provide an alternative between free and congested and toll and less congested.

This was taken during the afternoon rush hour, with traffic going westbound (Bellevue/Redmond to Seattle) at a near standstill.

Interesting.  I've heard that WA-520 was one of several facilities out there where the "reverse commute" is heavier than the regular commute.

I-10 Santa Monica Freeway in LA is busier in the morning heading to Santa Monica than it is heading to LA.

In this area, I-66 connects Downtown Washington with the Dulles Toll Road.  Along the Dulles Toll Road are Tysons Corner, Reston, and Dulles Airport - very siginificant employment centers.  The reverse commute is worse traffic, but the "forward commute" the highway is only open for Dulles Airport traffic and HOV-2.

One reason why the reverse commute may be busier is that the reverse commute is harder to serve by transit, so more people are driving.

Bruce



Quote from: mrsman on May 15, 2015, 01:58:35 PM
Quote from: Bruce on May 15, 2015, 01:03:42 PM


Quote from: mrsman on May 15, 2015, 08:43:20 AM

Can you tell us whether this was morning or afternoon rush hour and which direction was busier, E or W?

Also, bridges are a little different from HOT lanes because there are very few work arounds.  They will be busy despite tolls.  The tolls are for revenue generating purposes only, not to provide a smooth ride for tollpayers.

THe HOT lanes though do provide an alternative between free and congested and toll and less congested.

This was taken during the afternoon rush hour, with traffic going westbound (Bellevue/Redmond to Seattle) at a near standstill.

Interesting.  I've heard that WA-520 was one of several facilities out there where the "reverse commute" is heavier than the regular commute.

I-10 Santa Monica Freeway in LA is busier in the morning heading to Santa Monica than it is heading to LA.

In this area, I-66 connects Downtown Washington with the Dulles Toll Road.  Along the Dulles Toll Road are Tysons Corner, Reston, and Dulles Airport - very siginificant employment centers.  The reverse commute is worse traffic, but the "forward commute" the highway is only open for Dulles Airport traffic and HOV-2.

One reason why the reverse commute may be busier is that the reverse commute is harder to serve by transit, so more people are driving.

Seattle is quite unusual in having multiple corridors where reverse direction commutes tend to have more congestion, due in part to the nature of our suburban companies (Microsoft, Nintendo USA, Costco, Boeing, etc.) and because we have reversible express lanes that help relieve peak direction commutes. For example, heading into Seattle during PM rush hour:


I-5 southbound from 45th Street by SounderBruce, on Flickr

There's plenty of good bus connections (running at 10-minute or less frequencies during peak hours, 15-20 minutes during off peak weekdays) on most of these corridors, so the reverse commute isn't as painful for most suburban workers who live in the city. Some companies (like Microsoft) run special shuttle services into the city to pick up their workers to help relieve crowding on the most popular bus routes.

KEK Inc.

General rule of thumb.  Inbound traffic to Seattle is always bad between 7 AM - 7 PM (with a lunch break that's not too terrible between 11 AM and 2 PM). 

Obviously there's just a vortex that cars are teleported out of the city yet have to drive into the city.

I'm sure people will be happy when I-90 will be tolled (and the express lanes turn into SoundTransit Light Rail). 
Take the road less traveled.

Bruce


froggie

I heard something from a Tacoma buddy last month about extending the WA 167 freeway to I-5...didn't know it was going to be tolled.  Doesn't that also run across an Indian reservation between Tacoma and Puyallup?

What's WSDOT's rationale for tolling I-90?

Bickendan

Someone pulled down the proposed routing for WA 167 between WA 509 and the current freeway from OSM, but it's supposed to cross I-5 as it turns northward from its east-west segment in Fife, which puts it right in the reservation (and I didn't know that was a reservation until now).

jakeroot

Quote from: Bickendan on August 24, 2015, 06:45:02 PM
Someone pulled down the proposed routing for WA 167 between WA 509 and the current freeway from OSM...

Probably better off that way. It was a pretty rough sketch and I'm uncertain it was really all that accurate.

Quote from: froggie on August 21, 2015, 08:53:51 AM
I heard something from a Tacoma buddy last month about extending the WA 167 freeway to I-5...didn't know it was going to be tolled.

It's still up in the air. No official wording, but WSDOT's plans for where they want "full" vs "express" tolls indicates full tolling along this route.

Quote from: froggie on August 21, 2015, 08:53:51 AM
What's WSDOT's rationale for tolling I-90?

No longer any plans to do so. It was originally to help fund the "Rest of the West" 520 project (I-5 to Lake Washington) but the state legislature has since funded the construction, so revenue is no longer an issue.

Kacie Jane

Quote from: Bickendan on August 24, 2015, 06:45:02 PM
Someone pulled down the proposed routing for WA 167 between WA 509 and the current freeway from OSM, but it's supposed to cross I-5 as it turns northward from its east-west segment in Fife, which puts it right in the reservation (and I didn't know that was a reservation until now).

The Emerald Queen Casino on either side of the freeway there is a big green clue that it's Native American land.

Quote from: mrsman on May 15, 2015, 08:43:20 AMAlso, bridges are a little different from HOT lanes because there are very few work arounds.  They will be busy despite tolls.  The tolls are for revenue generating purposes only, not to provide a smooth ride for tollpayers.

Except when there are workarounds.  Since 520 has been tolled, traffic is slightly down, while traffic on I-90 is very slightly up and traffic on 522 (around the north end of the lake) is way up.  That said, yes, the tolling is to generate revenue for the project, not to reduce traffic on the bridge.

Henry

Quote from: Bruce on May 15, 2015, 02:23:23 PM


Quote from: mrsman on May 15, 2015, 01:58:35 PM
Quote from: Bruce on May 15, 2015, 01:03:42 PM


Quote from: mrsman on May 15, 2015, 08:43:20 AM

Can you tell us whether this was morning or afternoon rush hour and which direction was busier, E or W?

Also, bridges are a little different from HOT lanes because there are very few work arounds.  They will be busy despite tolls.  The tolls are for revenue generating purposes only, not to provide a smooth ride for tollpayers.

THe HOT lanes though do provide an alternative between free and congested and toll and less congested.

This was taken during the afternoon rush hour, with traffic going westbound (Bellevue/Redmond to Seattle) at a near standstill.

Interesting.  I've heard that WA-520 was one of several facilities out there where the "reverse commute" is heavier than the regular commute.

I-10 Santa Monica Freeway in LA is busier in the morning heading to Santa Monica than it is heading to LA.

In this area, I-66 connects Downtown Washington with the Dulles Toll Road.  Along the Dulles Toll Road are Tysons Corner, Reston, and Dulles Airport - very siginificant employment centers.  The reverse commute is worse traffic, but the "forward commute" the highway is only open for Dulles Airport traffic and HOV-2.

One reason why the reverse commute may be busier is that the reverse commute is harder to serve by transit, so more people are driving.

Seattle is quite unusual in having multiple corridors where reverse direction commutes tend to have more congestion, due in part to the nature of our suburban companies (Microsoft, Nintendo USA, Costco, Boeing, etc.) and because we have reversible express lanes that help relieve peak direction commutes.

There's plenty of good bus connections (running at 10-minute or less frequencies during peak hours, 15-20 minutes during off peak weekdays) on most of these corridors, so the reverse commute isn't as painful for most suburban workers who live in the city. Some companies (like Microsoft) run special shuttle services into the city to pick up their workers to help relieve crowding on the most popular bus routes.
I'd imagine that the reverse commuter is also heavier in Metro Detroit, with Ford and Chrysler being HQ'd in the suburbs (Dearborn and Auburn Hills, respectively), and GM having several sites outside its main HQ in the city as well.

As for the subject in question, I don't think I-90 needs tolls with the presence of those on WA 520. Although I-5 could use the express toll lanes from Tacoma to Everett, especially for the reverse commuters.
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

TEG24601

I have no problem with toll roads, that being said, tolling existing facilities, or without a plan to create new facilities seems antithetical to the point of tolling.  The 405 and 167 tolls seem more like congestion charging like they have in London, and a bit extreme, given out tax money already paid for the roads, and the new toll money won't go into expanding the roadway.  Now, if these tolling projects were to increase capacity, build a few select new freeways (we need at least two E-W, all the way to the waterfront, at least 1 N-S, and 1 bypass) that would be fine, but tolling with no goal in mind seems criminal to me.


That being said, I was Good-To-Go Electronic Tolling on the ferries, it would save so much time, effort, and energy.
They said take a left at the fork in the road.  I didn't think they literally meant a fork, until plain as day, there was a fork sticking out of the road at a junction.

jakeroot

Quote from: TEG24601 on August 27, 2015, 03:17:34 PM
...build a few select new freeways (we need at least two E-W, all the way to the waterfront, at least 1 N-S, and 1 bypass) that would be fine



Quote from: TEG24601 on August 27, 2015, 03:17:34 PM
The 405 and 167 tolls seem more like congestion charging like they have in London, and a bit extreme, given our tax money already paid for the roads

"Your" taxes have paid for numerous HOV facilities which you can't use. And now WSDOT comes around and says you can use them for a tiny fee...why complain? You should be celebrating.

Quote from: TEG24601 on August 27, 2015, 03:17:34 PM
the new toll money won't go into expanding the roadway...tolling with no goal in mind seems criminal to me.

No, because it goes to maintaining the facility itself. You do understand running costs, right? The longer they exist, the more popular they become, the more money WSDOT makes; however, WSDOT is not installing them to make money. The goal is to ensure quick travel times, and if you've ever driven the 167 HOT lanes, you'd know how well it all works.

Kacie Jane

The 167 HOT lanes were put in too long ago for me to remember, but in the case of 405 at least, they're adding another lane in each direction.  So not by a whole lot, but there is some increased capacity.

bing101

http://www.rentonreporter.com/news/329270631.html


Here is an update for the 405 Freeway adding Toll Lanes in the Seattle area






http://www.king5.com/story/news/traffic/2015/09/25/i-405-lane-closures-express-tolls/72794576/


Wow this is played as Carmageddon on the 405 Freeway but this time its not the San Diego Freeway in Los Angeles.

Bruce

Quote from: bing101 on September 25, 2015, 11:21:58 PMthe 405 Freeway

Get out of here you filthy Californian transplant. /s

Anyway, the major closure over the weekend is for re-striping the HOT lanes. Signs are already up (I spotted a new "Toll lanes ahead" sign above the I-405/I-5/SR 525 interchange in Lynnwood while riding home today) and people do have their Flex Passes.

Bruce

Probably should revive this thread, given the massive controversies that the I-405 Express Toll Lanes have spawned.

Might even be part of the reason that Lynn Peterson is out of her job as Secretary of Transportation, among other things.

myosh_tino

Quote from: Bruce on February 12, 2016, 12:37:54 AM
Probably should revive this thread, given the massive controversies that the I-405 Express Toll Lanes have spawned.

Might even be part of the reason that Lynn Peterson is out of her job as Secretary of Transportation, among other things.

Did a quick Google search on the Washington I-405 Express Lanes and wow, it doesn't look like they're working the way those at WSDOT thought they would.  I find it *very* surprising that these lanes operate 24/7.

Down here in northern California, where new express lanes are about to open on I-580 between Dublin and Livermore, tolls are only collected either during commute hours (5-10am and 3-7pm Mon-Fri on the I-880/CA-237 Express Lanes) or during the day (5am-8pm Mon-Fri on the I-680 Express Lane and future I-580 Express Lanes).  These lanes are open to all during the overnight hours and on weekends.

The I-680 and 880/237 express lanes have designated entry and exit points which have infuriated drivers, especially carpoolers, who have to choose between using the express lane and missing their exit or using the congested general purpose lanes.  The new I-580 express lanes will, for the most part, be open access meaning you can enter and exit the lanes at will.
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

jakeroot

Quote from: myosh_tino on February 12, 2016, 02:39:02 AM
Did a quick Google search on the Washington I-405 Express Lanes and wow, it doesn't look like they're working the way those at WSDOT thought they would.  I find it *very* surprising that these lanes operate 24/7.

There's actually a bill in the Senate right now that would end toll collection during off-peak hours. I used to be on WSDOT's side, as, well, they're the engineers and probably know best, but even I'd end tolls after rush hour is over. Express Lanes' purpose is moot when there's no congestion to provide relief from.

As a result of 24/7 tolling, and much higher use than expected, WSDOT has made almost 4x what they expected to make in revenue so far ($4M versus $1M).

The Ghostbuster

Does anyone think getting rid of the tolls will improve traffic flow on Interstate 405? I am skeptical, but then again, I've never been to the Seattle area.

jakeroot

Quote from: The Ghostbuster on February 13, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Does anyone think getting rid of the tolls will improve traffic flow on Interstate 405? I am skeptical, but then again, I've never been to the Seattle area.

It was bad before, so I'm not sure there would be an improvement. The only sure-fire way to improve traffic is to, surprisingly(?), reduce the number of cars on the road, by encouraging transit and HOV. Going back to one HOV lane is not encouraging that (why bother with HOV when they're moving just as slow as the GP lanes?), so we should keep the current system, but change a couple things:

- Open the lanes up to all during off-hours
- re-stripe the lanes with with one solid white line to permit unlimited access; or
- build more left exits to discourage movements to/from the express lanes; and/or
- introduce hard shoulder running for buses and HOV, who are only on the freeway for a short distance.

Kacie Jane

It depends on what's meant by "improve traffic flow".  The HOT lanes have improved travel time between Lynnwood and Bellevue (the two ends), which is why WSDOT touts them as a success, and why their data seems to back up that claim.  But it's made things worse for people getting on or off at SR 520 or SR 522, since to take advantage of the HOT lanes, they need to merge across the 3+ GP lanes, and have a limited space to do so because of the double white lines.

Quote- Open the lanes up to all during off-hours
This won't actually do much to solve the problems, since there isn't nearly as much traffic during "off-hours".  So of course (sarcasm), this is the solution that seems to have the most traction.

I should clarify.  This won't do much to solve the actual traffic problems.  But what it will do is give people the illusion that they're doing something, so it might get the more sheep-like voters in their constituency off their back.

Quote- re-stripe the lanes with with one solid white line to permit unlimited access
This might work, it might not.  Part of the reason for the double white line is the tolling; it means you can't duck out of the lane to avoid the gantry where the toll is charged.  But it also helps with a genuine safety issue.  If the HOT lanes are working as intended, and say the GP lanes are moving 30 mph and the HOT lanes are moving at 50 mph, then changing lanes between the two can be pretty dangerous.

At best, it probably spreads out congestion at the merge points, which is a good thing.  But you're probably still going to have people slam on the brakes in the HOT lanes as they either (A) slow down to squeeze into the GP lane, or (B) have someone cut in front of them from the GP lane and try to get up to speed.

Quote- build more left exits to discourage movements to/from the express lanes
Yes.  Unfortunately, this is also the most expensive option.

Quote- introduce hard shoulder running for buses and HOV, who are only on the freeway for a short distance.
They are doing this on the north end where it will help most.  The issue with doing it further south is that the transit stops are mixed between the left and right side.  Once buses get back on the freeway on the right side at NE 160th St, shoulder running won't help since they need to get to the HOT lanes to serve the left-side stop at NE 128th.  South of there, there's a right side stop at NE 70th, but it's barely used (only two Metro routes stop there, no Sound Transit routes).  Buses to downtown Bellevue have straight shot to the end of the HOT lanes at NE 6th; buses to Seattle have to cross back to the right side for the SR 520 exit.

Unless we can spend millions (billions?) of dollars on your third solution and get HOV ramps at the 520 interchange (you'd only really need 520 EB->405 NB and 405 SB->520 WB, but that's still $$$$), and maybe replace the transit stop at 70th with a HOT lane interchange, there's not an easy fix for transit south of Totem Lake.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.