AARoads Forum

Non-Road Boards => Off-Topic => Topic started by: roadman65 on May 16, 2025, 06:17:43 PM

Title: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: roadman65 on May 16, 2025, 06:17:43 PM
https://www.newsweek.com/largest-antebellum-plantation-house-america-destroyed-fire-2073215
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: LilianaUwU on May 16, 2025, 06:22:36 PM
Rich people hangout spot burns down. Womp womp.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:25:37 PM
I see this as a net positive, one less monument to slavery.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: roadman65 on May 16, 2025, 06:34:52 PM
At least the house redeemed itself and was put to better use later.  Like an Inn.for people to stay at.

Regardless, of who owned it originally, it was an engineering marvel. 
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:36:02 PM
I've seen it in person.  It was a pretty structure, but that's about all I can say that is positive.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: thspfc on May 16, 2025, 06:39:04 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:25:37 PMI see this as a net positive, one less monument to slavery.
This line of thinking gets into the weeds real quick.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:45:15 PM
Quote from: thspfc on May 16, 2025, 06:39:04 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:25:37 PMI see this as a net positive, one less monument to slavery.
This line of thinking gets into the weeds real quick.

Unfortunately it is part of the history of the structure.  Kind of difficult for a lot of people not to associate it with slave labor. 

To be clear, I'm not calling for the demolition structures associated with era of slavery.  I just don't feel all that bad when things like this happen.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: SectorZ on May 16, 2025, 08:10:57 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:45:15 PM
Quote from: thspfc on May 16, 2025, 06:39:04 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:25:37 PMI see this as a net positive, one less monument to slavery.
This line of thinking gets into the weeds real quick.

Unfortunately it is part of the history of the structure.  Kind of difficult for a lot of people not to associate it with slave labor. 

To be clear, I'm not calling for the demolition structures associated with era of slavery.  I just don't feel all that bad when things like this happen.

I live in an area that has thousands of old remaining homes that had slaves in them. There are tens of thousands in the northeast. Are they exempt just because they discovered slavery sucked, without force being used to enlighten them, a hundred or so years before the south did?
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: thspfc on May 16, 2025, 08:12:36 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:45:15 PM
Quote from: thspfc on May 16, 2025, 06:39:04 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 06:25:37 PMI see this as a net positive, one less monument to slavery.
This line of thinking gets into the weeds real quick.

Unfortunately it is part of the history of the structure.  Kind of difficult for a lot of people not to associate it with slave labor. 

To be clear, I'm not calling for the demolition structures associated with era of slavery.  I just don't feel all that bad when things like this happen.
I don't feel bad. But I don't think it's a net positive.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: Road Hog on May 16, 2025, 08:29:34 PM
It was built in 1859, so barely antebellum.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: Max Rockatansky on May 16, 2025, 08:30:33 PM
Barely but still is.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: Rothman on May 16, 2025, 09:37:33 PM
If there is antibellum, that implies a probellum.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: 1995hoo on May 16, 2025, 09:47:36 PM
How do you tell that a house opposes war?
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: formulanone on May 16, 2025, 10:09:43 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 16, 2025, 09:37:33 PMIf there is antibellum, that implies a probellum.

Hoostown, we half a probellum.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: kphoger on May 16, 2025, 10:15:31 PM
Quote from: thspfc on May 16, 2025, 08:12:36 PMI don't feel bad. But I don't think it's a net positive.

Maybe it can become a Buc-ee's instead.  Then everyone will be happy.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: TheCatalyst31 on May 17, 2025, 10:30:07 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on May 16, 2025, 06:34:52 PMAt least the house redeemed itself and was put to better use later.  Like an Inn.for people to stay at.

Regardless, of who owned it originally, it was an engineering marvel. 

For me that makes it worse. I don't object to keeping plantations around, but if you do you have to talk about the atrocities that happened there. Turning a plantation into a fancy hotel or wedding venue feels disrespectful to the people who were enslaved there.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: Max Rockatansky on May 17, 2025, 10:38:53 PM
Quote from: TheCatalyst31 on May 17, 2025, 10:30:07 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on May 16, 2025, 06:34:52 PMAt least the house redeemed itself and was put to better use later.  Like an Inn.for people to stay at.

Regardless, of who owned it originally, it was an engineering marvel. 

For me that makes it worse. I don't object to keeping plantations around, but if you do you have to talk about the atrocities that happened there. Turning a plantation into a fancy hotel or wedding venue feels disrespectful to the people who were enslaved there.

This articulates what I was trying to get at upthread more succinctly.
Title: Re: Fire Destroys an Antibellum House
Post by: SEWIGuy on May 18, 2025, 07:43:08 AM
Quote from: TheCatalyst31 on May 17, 2025, 10:30:07 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on May 16, 2025, 06:34:52 PMAt least the house redeemed itself and was put to better use later.  Like an Inn.for people to stay at.

Regardless, of who owned it originally, it was an engineering marvel. 

For me that makes it worse. I don't object to keeping plantations around, but if you do you have to talk about the atrocities that happened there. Turning a plantation into a fancy hotel or wedding venue feels disrespectful to the people who were enslaved there.

So what exactly are we supposed to do with them? Tear them all down or turn them into museums?  Near where I used to live, there is an old stone house that used to be part of the Underground Railroad. It is now a winery. Is that a respectful purpose?

Don't get me wrong. The last place I would want to be is hanging at a wedding in an antebellum mansion that was part of a plantation. And I am certainly not going to shed a tear that it's gone. I just don't think we should get so hung up on how these facilties are used now. Better than they are useful than torn down for another generic venue IMO.