Shortest road name?

Started by agentsteel53, January 15, 2013, 05:56:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

agentsteel53

Quote from: empirestate on January 16, 2013, 12:04:32 PM

Could be...as written, isn't it saying that only two words in total may be used to devise all of the road names in the area? Let's see, we've got "Cat Hollow" and "Hollow Cat"...uh oh, ran out of possibilities! :-D

I actually have a friend who is a proofreader for municipal codes and would likely have caught that.

there's also "Cat Cat" and "Hollow Hollow", and that is assuming that those two words need to form a two-word result string.  without that assumption, we'd have such excellent road names as "Cat Hollow Cat" and "Hollow Hollow Cat Cat Libertador General Hollow".  (they had to let that one in, for obvious reasons.)
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com


kphoger

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 16, 2013, 09:33:09 AM
Quote from: Steve on January 16, 2013, 08:12:21 AM
I should note that in the Midwest, frequently small towns drop all road identifiers. You'll come in and see "D," "C," "B," "A" in order on street blade signs. Can't really get shorter than that.

got any evidence of formal US Postal Service proscription of this? 

yes, I probably could mail a letter to "11660 A, Springfield" and it will get there, but is that correct?

It depends on what the street is actually called.  If the name is D, rather than D Street, then who cares what proscription the US Postal Service has?

Does anyone have a specific example?

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

kphoger

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 15, 2013, 09:54:45 PM
QuoteRoadway names shall be comprised of no more than two words.

grammar fail.  fucking elected officials.

Quote from: agentsteel53 on October 15, 2012, 01:44:46 PM
I am the farthest thing from a language prescriptivist.

The irony was not lost on me.

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 16, 2013, 09:56:45 AM
it's not poor grammar in general which I dislike ... but rather, the use of poor grammar by those who theoretically are supposed to be experts at writing all the fine-print stuff which trips up ordinary folks all the time. 

Oh.  Shoot.  Guess I should have read that before looking up your three-month-old post, then, huh?

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

agentsteel53

Quote from: kphoger on January 16, 2013, 01:11:37 PM

Quote from: agentsteel53 on January 16, 2013, 09:56:45 AM
it's not poor grammar in general which I dislike ... but rather, the use of poor grammar by those who theoretically are supposed to be experts at writing all the fine-print stuff which trips up ordinary folks all the time. 

Oh.  Shoot.  Guess I should have read that before looking up your three-month-old post, then, huh?

probably.

I will hold elected officials to a human standard when they step down from office and return to the species.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.