Cities with three interstates that don't end with 0 or 5

Started by Zzonkmiles, December 01, 2014, 11:11:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

freebrickproductions

Once I-22 gets completed, Birmingham will have I-22, I-59, and I-459 if we are including 3dis.
It's all fun & games until someone summons Cthulhu and brings about the end of the world.

I also collect traffic lights, road signs, fans, and railroad crossing equipment.

Art in avatar by Moncatto (18+)!

(They/Them)


adventurernumber1

Quote from: freebrickproductions on December 01, 2014, 10:45:39 PM
Once I-22 gets completed, Birmingham will have I-22, I-59, and I-459 if we are including 3dis.

I don't believe we're including 3dis.

But, that will make Birmingham another city to list on the thread that would have an equal amount of x5/x0 interstates and other interstates.

Quote from: Pete from Boston on December 01, 2014, 09:57:33 PM
I-77 doesn't go to Charleston, even though I've driven it out of there.

I-77 does go through Charleston, it's just concurrent with I-64.

hbelkins

Quote from: Mapmikey on December 01, 2014, 11:54:06 AM
Quote from: NE2 on December 01, 2014, 11:15:05 AM

Huntington: 64, 73, 74 :bigass:

If we're playing this way...

Wytheville, VA: 74, 77, 81
Lansing, MI: 69, 73, 96

Mapmikey

And...

Dawson Springs, Princeton and Eddyville, KY: 24, 66 and 69.  :bigass:
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Zzonkmiles

Also, I just realized that Vermont and North Dakota are the only two (lower 48) states that are not served by any x0 or x5 interstate. There might be another one, but I think these are the only ones.

hotdogPi

Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 04, 2014, 02:23:45 PM
Also, I just realized that Vermont and North Dakota are the only two (lower 48) states that are not served by any x0 or x5 interstate. There might be another one, but I think these are the only ones.

West Virginia barely has I-70. That's the closest you'll get to a third state.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

Fred Defender

Quote from: NE2 on December 01, 2014, 11:15:05 AM
Milwaukee: 41, 43, 94

I travel to Milwaukee occasionally on business. Is there an INTERSTATE 41? US41 (along with 45) is a controlled-access highway. But I don't believe that there is an I-41 in Wisconsin, is there?
AGAM

Zeffy

Quote from: Fred Defender on December 04, 2014, 03:09:51 PM
I travel to Milwaukee occasionally on business. Is there an INTERSTATE 41? US41 (along with 45) is a controlled-access highway. But I don't believe that there is an I-41 in Wisconsin, is there?

US 41 is currently being upgraded to Interstate standards in Wisconsin, also upgrading it to I-41 in the process.

See here for more of that.
Life would be boring if we didn't take an offramp every once in a while

A weird combination of a weather geek, roadgeek, car enthusiast and furry mixed with many anxiety related disorders

Fred Defender

Quote from: Zeffy on December 04, 2014, 03:13:52 PM
Quote from: Fred Defender on December 04, 2014, 03:09:51 PM
I travel to Milwaukee occasionally on business. Is there an INTERSTATE 41? US41 (along with 45) is a controlled-access highway. But I don't believe that there is an I-41 in Wisconsin, is there?

US 41 is currently being upgraded to Interstate standards in Wisconsin, also upgrading it to I-41 in the process.

See here for more of that.

I stand corrected, I guess. I'll be looking forward to watching as I-41's construction progresses through High Springs, FL.
AGAM

CNGL-Leudimin

Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 04, 2014, 02:23:45 PM
Also, I just realized that Vermont and North Dakota are the only two (lower 48) states that are not served by any x0 or x5 interstate. There might be another one, but I think these are the only ones.

OTOH, you have Delaware, Maine, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wyoming which are only served by x0 and x5 interstates. Delaware, Maine and Rhode Island by virtue of having a lone 2di each (And it's I-95 in all three!). However, Nevada will fall off when I-11 is signed.
Supporter of the construction of several running gags, including I-366 with a speed limit of 85 mph (137 km/h) and the Hypotenuse.

Please note that I may mention "invalid" FM channels, i.e. ending in an even number or down to 87.5. These are valid in Europe.

Thing 342

Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on December 04, 2014, 04:17:12 PM
Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 04, 2014, 02:23:45 PM
Also, I just realized that Vermont and North Dakota are the only two (lower 48) states that are not served by any x0 or x5 interstate. There might be another one, but I think these are the only ones.

OTOH, you have Delaware, Maine, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wyoming which are only served by x0 and x5 interstates. Delaware, Maine and Rhode Island by virtue of having a lone 2di each (And it's I-95 in all three!). However, Nevada will fall off when I-11 is signed.
I believe you can add Kansas to that list, being served only by I-35 and I-70.

CNGL-Leudimin

Oops, I thought Kansas had I-29. Damn that tricky Kansas City, Missouri...
Supporter of the construction of several running gags, including I-366 with a speed limit of 85 mph (137 km/h) and the Hypotenuse.

Please note that I may mention "invalid" FM channels, i.e. ending in an even number or down to 87.5. These are valid in Europe.

empirestate

Quote from: 1995hoo on December 01, 2014, 11:44:51 AM
Assuming you're not focused strictly on the city limits and are instead looking at the metro area, Honolulu with H-1, H-2, and H-3 :bigass:

And even if you are, it still works. Honolulu encompasses the entire island.

Also, I'm ready to county Binghamton.

Pete from Boston


Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on December 05, 2014, 09:22:03 AM
Oops, I thought Kansas had I-29. Damn that tricky Kansas City, Missouri...

Previous examples have counted the concept of serving a city as meaning serving their metropolitan area.  So if it's a difference between Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas City, Kansas, I would say they're both served by the presence of that road in that area, and it fits as well as a lot of the other examples here.

dgolub

NYC has only two I-78 and I-87, but if you included three-digit interstates then you pick up I-278, I-678, the unsigned I-478, and NY 878, which used to be I-878.  If you expand to the metropolitan area, then you get I-287 and I-684.

Zzonkmiles

Quote from: 1 on December 04, 2014, 02:28:43 PM
Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 04, 2014, 02:23:45 PM
Also, I just realized that Vermont and North Dakota are the only two (lower 48) states that are not served by any x0 or x5 interstate. There might be another one, but I think these are the only ones.

West Virginia barely has I-70. That's the closest you'll get to a third state.

You could also say that New Hampshire barely has I-95. I think I-95 only lasts for about 20 miles in NH, but I'm not sure offhand. I'm sure WV's I-70 is even shorter.

cl94

Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 05, 2014, 10:29:03 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 04, 2014, 02:28:43 PM
Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 04, 2014, 02:23:45 PM
Also, I just realized that Vermont and North Dakota are the only two (lower 48) states that are not served by any x0 or x5 interstate. There might be another one, but I think these are the only ones.

West Virginia barely has I-70. That's the closest you'll get to a third state.

You could also say that New Hampshire barely has I-95. I think I-95 only lasts for about 20 miles in NH, but I'm not sure offhand. I'm sure WV's I-70 is even shorter.

I-95 is in New Hampshire for 16.08 miles. I-70 is 14.45 miles in West Virginia.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Buck87

Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 01, 2014, 06:54:33 PM
Quote from: clong on December 01, 2014, 06:30:00 PM
Kansas City has 2 of each - 29 and 49, 35 and 70 as does Memphis with 22 and 69, 40 and 55 and St Louis 44 and 64, 55 and 70

Oh, I'll see your Kansas City and raise you a New York City! (78, 87, 80, 95)   :)

(I love this forum.)

Another one for the 2 & 2 category is Indianapolis: 65, 70, 69, 74

jp the roadgeek

Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on December 04, 2014, 04:17:12 PM
Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 04, 2014, 02:23:45 PM
Also, I just realized that Vermont and North Dakota are the only two (lower 48) states that are not served by any x0 or x5 interstate. There might be another one, but I think these are the only ones.

OTOH, you have Delaware, Maine, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wyoming which are only served by x0 and x5 interstates. Delaware, Maine and Rhode Island by virtue of having a lone 2di each (And it's I-95 in all three!). However, Nevada will fall off when I-11 is signed.

Damn them RI NIMBYs who stopped I-84 to Providence.   If you count White River Junction/St. Johnsbury VT as one "metropolitan" area, you'd have I-89, I-91, and I-93.
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

cl94

Quote from: jp the roadgeek on December 06, 2014, 01:14:29 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on December 04, 2014, 04:17:12 PM
Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 04, 2014, 02:23:45 PM
Also, I just realized that Vermont and North Dakota are the only two (lower 48) states that are not served by any x0 or x5 interstate. There might be another one, but I think these are the only ones.

OTOH, you have Delaware, Maine, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wyoming which are only served by x0 and x5 interstates. Delaware, Maine and Rhode Island by virtue of having a lone 2di each (And it's I-95 in all three!). However, Nevada will fall off when I-11 is signed.

If you count White River Junction/St. Johnsbury VT as one "metropolitan" area, you'd have I-89, I-91, and I-93.

Ummm...no. That's like saying Buffalo and Rochester are in the same metropolitan area. Might be separated by a relatively short distance, but there's a whole lot of nothing between them.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

froggie

From personal experience, there's 59 miles on I-91 between I-89 and I-93.

SSOWorld

Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 01, 2014, 06:54:33 PM
Quote from: clong on December 01, 2014, 06:30:00 PM
Kansas City has 2 of each - 29 and 49, 35 and 70 as does Memphis with 22 and 69, 40 and 55 and St Louis 44 and 64, 55 and 70

Oh, I'll see your Kansas City and raise you a New York City! (78, 87, 80, 95)   :)

(I love this forum.)
BZZZZ

First, I-80 does not reach the NY border - it ends at the NJ Turnpike.
Quote from: dgolub on December 05, 2014, 07:55:08 PM
NYC has only two I-78 and I-87, but if you included three-digit interstates then you pick up I-278, I-678, the unsigned I-478, and NY 878, which used to be I-878.  If you expand to the metropolitan area, then you get I-287 and I-684.
But we're not including 3-digit interstates :awesomeface:
Quote from: empirestate on December 05, 2014, 04:59:45 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on December 01, 2014, 11:44:51 AM
Assuming you're not focused strictly on the city limits and are instead looking at the metro area, Honolulu with H-1, H-2, and H-3 :bigass:

And even if you are, it still works. Honolulu encompasses the entire island.
To the fact that Honolulu is the only city in Hawaii and encompasses the county of the same name and the island
Scott O.

Not all who wander are lost...
Ah, the open skies, wind at my back, warm sun on my... wait, where the hell am I?!
As a matter of fact, I do own the road.
Raise your what?

Wisconsin - out-multiplexing your state since 1918.

NE2

Quote from: SSOWorld on December 06, 2014, 06:31:59 PM
Quote from: Zzonkmiles on December 01, 2014, 06:54:33 PM
Quote from: clong on December 01, 2014, 06:30:00 PM
Kansas City has 2 of each - 29 and 49, 35 and 70 as does Memphis with 22 and 69, 40 and 55 and St Louis 44 and 64, 55 and 70

Oh, I'll see your Kansas City and raise you a New York City! (78, 87, 80, 95)   :)

(I love this forum.)
BZZZZ
BZZZZ yourself. The very first post mentioned Slidell, whose city limits I-59 does not touch.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

hbelkins

Quote from: cl94 on December 05, 2014, 11:22:31 PM
I-95 is in New Hampshire for 16.08 miles. I-70 is 14.45 miles in West Virginia.

However, the drive on I-95 seems MUCH longer than the drive on I-70 despite only being a couple of miles longer.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.