News:

The server restarts at 2 AM and 6 PM Eastern Time daily. This results in a short period of downtime, so if you get a 502 error at those times, that is why.
- Alex

Main Menu

The Next NHL Expansion...

Started by Henry, December 15, 2014, 12:15:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Henry

Looks like the NHL is about to expand again, so it will be a 32-team league, like the NFL, according to the link below:

http://nypost.com/2014/12/14/current-nhl-teams-need-to-prep-for-expansion-cap-woes/

Where should the NHL expand, if and when it does? I say Seattle and Quebec.
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!


TEG24601

Seattle is a must, we are begging for a 4th team.


I've heard suggestions for Portland, Halifax, Quebec, or Hamilton.
They said take a left at the fork in the road.  I didn't think they literally meant a fork, until plain as day, there was a fork sticking out of the road at a junction.

on_wisconsin

Milwaukee!!!!!

(Seriously, it will most likely be Vegas and Quebec/  Seattle/ Toronto II/ etc...)
"Speed does not kill, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you" - Jeremy Clarkson

1995hoo

If they do expand, it'd be nice to even up the conferences, presumably as a 16/16 setup with four eight-team divisions.

Seattle and Quebec seem like the two most-discussed if Seattle builds a new arena (Quebec is already doing so). Las Vegas has been getting a fair amount of mention lately as well. I think Hamilton seems less likely than a second Toronto team simply because Hamilton would be seen as having more of an impact on the Buffalo Sabres, who draw a fair number of people from Southern Ontario because it's easier and cheaper to get Sabres tickets than it is to get Maple Leafs tickets.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

on_wisconsin

#4
Quote from: 1995hoo on December 15, 2014, 12:51:46 PMSeattle and Quebec seem like the two most-discussed if Seattle builds a new arena (Quebec is already doing so). Las Vegas has been getting a fair amount of mention lately as well.
Las Vegas is also building an NHL friendly arena as we speak too.

http://www.arenalasvegas.com/home.aspx
"Speed does not kill, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you" - Jeremy Clarkson

texaskdog

I don't see Las Vegas being such a great option with so many warm weather teams failing.  I'd love to have one in Austin and we have a lot of transplants here but we might max out at the AAA level.

1995hoo

I think the biggest issue with Las Vegas is that, while there are no other teams to compete against locally (unless you count UNLV basketball), there's a lot of other stuff in town capturing the tourist dollars. How many tourists who head there to gamble are going to want to take time out to go to a game, unless the NHL thinks fans of teams in other cities will try to schedule trips to Vegas to coincide with their home teams' visits? That's also a problem for weeknight games since so many visitors come on weekends. Are there enough local residents to form enough of a fanbase to justify a team there? As the Florida Panthers illustrate, trying to rely on the visiting fans for attendance isn't a great strategy.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

texaskdog

Quote from: 1995hoo on December 15, 2014, 01:38:04 PM
I think the biggest issue with Las Vegas is that, while there are no other teams to compete against locally (unless you count UNLV basketball), there's a lot of other stuff in town capturing the tourist dollars. How many tourists who head there to gamble are going to want to take time out to go to a game, unless the NHL thinks fans of teams in other cities will try to schedule trips to Vegas to coincide with their home teams' visits? That's also a problem for weeknight games since so many visitors come on weekends. Are there enough local residents to form enough of a fanbase to justify a team there? As the Florida Panthers illustrate, trying to rely on the visiting fans for attendance isn't a great strategy.

I'd think they'd try to get some of these warm weather teams that don't draw to move (Florida, Carolina, etc) and then get a few more Canadian teams in.

Stephane Dumas

I heard some others rumors then the Florida Panthers is in dire financial trouble then the owners could sell the team to move it elsewhere.

formulanone


Quote from: 1995hoo on December 15, 2014, 01:38:04 PM
As the Florida Panthers illustrate, trying to rely on the visiting fans for attendance isn't a great strategy.

Attendance was quite good until the team wasn't making the playoffs. (2001 or so?) They had the advantage of being a great team right from the get-go, with pretty good support for about 8 years.

But fickle South Florida fans stopped coming, since it wasn't the newest thing anymore; in a place with fair-weather fans (and a truly fair weather locale with lots to do), they've struggled. Only the Dolphins are held with a sense of historical regard; they've been a rather average team, but they typically fill 2/3 of the stadium.

1995hoo

Quote from: texaskdog on December 15, 2014, 01:51:00 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on December 15, 2014, 01:38:04 PM
I think the biggest issue with Las Vegas is that, while there are no other teams to compete against locally (unless you count UNLV basketball), there's a lot of other stuff in town capturing the tourist dollars. How many tourists who head there to gamble are going to want to take time out to go to a game, unless the NHL thinks fans of teams in other cities will try to schedule trips to Vegas to coincide with their home teams' visits? That's also a problem for weeknight games since so many visitors come on weekends. Are there enough local residents to form enough of a fanbase to justify a team there? As the Florida Panthers illustrate, trying to rely on the visiting fans for attendance isn't a great strategy.

I'd think they'd try to get some of these warm weather teams that don't draw to move (Florida, Carolina, etc) and then get a few more Canadian teams in.

As we saw with the Coyotes, the league will do whatever they can to prevent teams from moving, especially where the team plays in a publicly-financed arena (the Hurricanes are one such). Obviously there are very sound reasons for that: If you get the public to build you a new arena and then you move the team, why would any public entity agree to build an arena for any other team?




Quote from: formulanone on December 15, 2014, 02:04:03 PM

Quote from: 1995hoo on December 15, 2014, 01:38:04 PM
As the Florida Panthers illustrate, trying to rely on the visiting fans for attendance isn't a great strategy.

Attendance was quite good until the team wasn't making the playoffs. (2001 or so?) They had the advantage of being a great team right from the get-go, with pretty good support for about 8 years.

But fickle South Florida fans stopped coming, since it wasn't the newest thing anymore; in a place with fair-weather fans (and a truly fair weather locale with lots to do), they've struggled. Only the Dolphins are held with a sense of historical regard; they've been a rather average team, but they typically fill 2/3 of the stadium.

Yeah, I remember their run to the Stanley Cup Finals.

My brother-in-law lives reasonably close to their current arena (he lives off Pines Boulevard near its western end) but has only ever been to one game. Took his son. I'm sure the arena's location doesn't necessarily help weeknight attendance when you factor in the Miami area's traffic.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

ET21

Quote from: TEG24601 on December 15, 2014, 12:36:14 PM
Seattle is a must, we are begging for a 4th team.


I've heard suggestions for Portland, Halifax, Quebec, or Hamilton.

Vancouver will be noting a Seattle NHL team, could see a good rivalry start there.
The local weatherman, trust me I can be 99.9% right!
"Show where you're going, without forgetting where you're from"

Clinched:
IL: I-88, I-180, I-190, I-290, I-294, I-355, IL-390
IN: I-80, I-94
SD: I-190
WI: I-90
MI: I-94, I-196
MN: I-90

spooky

Hartford. Bring back the Whale!!!

Pete from Boston


Quote from: spooky on December 15, 2014, 05:31:00 PM
Hartford. Bring back the Whale!!!

Aaaaaandd... "Brass Bonanza" settles in my head, where it will stay for the foreseeable future.

1995hoo

Quote from: Pete from Boston on December 15, 2014, 06:44:30 PM

Quote from: spooky on December 15, 2014, 05:31:00 PM
Hartford. Bring back the Whale!!!

Aaaaaandd... "Brass Bonanza" settles in my head, where it will stay for the foreseeable future.

http://youtu.be/TJtiepwpKFw
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

Alps

Quote from: Henry on December 15, 2014, 12:15:05 PM
Looks like the NHL is about to expand again
"I read a blog and construed it as fact"