I fucking ABHOR protected left turn arrows

Started by bugo, April 02, 2015, 02:21:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

bugo

It is ridiculous to sit in the left lane of an urban street with no traffic coming in the opposite direction for miles and not being able to make a left turn until the lights cycle. I can understand why the DOTs disallow left turns without the arrow in heavy traffic, but why not program the signals to have a regular green light from, say, 10pm to 7am. Yes, I have been the victim of the dreaded no turns on red light many times and yes, I've blown through them many times. The law should be written that if there is time to make the turn safely, then make the turn. I would go even further and say the state legislatures should ban left turn arrows except on dangerous intersections and only during the day.


signalman

I've been a victim of many of these and eventually turned on red at night as well.  IMO, situations like these could use a FYA.  The signal could be programmed to be protected only during peak hours, then switched to FYA the rest of the time; only turning red when the cross street has green.

Zeffy

This intersection has caused me to wait UNTIL SOMEONE PULLED UP ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION BEFORE CHANGING. That's NOT okay. It took about 3 1/2 minutes before the signal did change, and considering the city I was in I thought about blowing through it when there was nothing remotely dangerous about doing it, but I've lately been seeing more actual Trenton PD cars scattered throughout the streets, so I didn't feel like chancing it.

But I agree with bugo - these things need a fucking change. I can't believe I had to sit in a turn lane for nearly 4 minutes because the cycle was dependent on someone being at the opposite side of the intersection.
Life would be boring if we didn't take an offramp every once in a while

A weird combination of a weather geek, roadgeek, car enthusiast and furry mixed with many anxiety related disorders

NE2

Quote from: Zeffy on April 02, 2015, 09:54:40 AM
This intersection has caused me to wait UNTIL SOMEONE PULLED UP ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION BEFORE CHANGING. That's NOT okay. It took about 3 1/2 minutes before the signal did change, and considering the city I was in I thought about blowing through it when there was nothing remotely dangerous about doing it, but I've lately been seeing more actual Trenton PD cars scattered throughout the streets, so I didn't feel like chancing it.
Welcome to road biking 101.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

Big John

^^ I only see traffic detectors in the pavement in only 1 of the left-turn lanes and I don't see any optical detectors.  Somebody dropped the ball there.

Bickendan

You want flashing yellow lights.
And NE2's right -- bikes have a hell of a time trying to trip a protected green arrow, even when the sensor wires are obvious and even when the city paints where the bike's supposed to go.

Zeffy

#6
Quote from: Bickendan on April 02, 2015, 10:57:43 AM
You want flashing yellow lights.
And NE2's right -- bikes have a hell of a time trying to trip a protected green arrow, even when the sensor wires are obvious and even when the city paints where the bike's supposed to go.

I would love a FYA here. It would work way better than this shit. Actually, a lot of Trenton's signals seem poorly timed. Maybe it was just that the traffic is a lot less on Sunday then other days so the lights are timed for the busy days. Which is stupid.

EDIT: Not to mention this fad is sweeping Hillsborough. Two of our intersections have been replaced with these monstrosities. Sometimes they work decent. Other times I'll go other ways to avoid them.
Life would be boring if we didn't take an offramp every once in a while

A weird combination of a weather geek, roadgeek, car enthusiast and furry mixed with many anxiety related disorders

wphiii

Quote from: signalman on April 02, 2015, 04:20:04 AM
I've been a victim of many of these and eventually turned on red at night as well.  IMO, situations like these could use a FYA.  The signal could be programmed to be protected only during peak hours, then switched to FYA the rest of the time; only turning red when the cross street has green.

Around here, a lot of the intersections with a left turn arrow part of the cycle just turn to straight green when the protected phase ends. Seems to work pretty well.

This is a big one, and it's either all green, red with green left-turn arrow (during the protected phase), or all red. The left-turning traffic is never prohibited from making the turn while the traffic alongside it is allowed to move.

texaskdog

I hate the intersections that have the left arrow AND the traffic going straight.  It turns red and the other direction does the same.  I prefer the MN signals:  The left turners go first and when the line subsides all straight traffic goes.  Left turners can still go, unprotected.

1995hoo

This morning I got stuck at the light leaving my neighborhood because I got there just 15 or 20 seconds too late: Traffic coming the other way on my street had gotten a green and if I'm not there before that green comes on, the light makes me wait through the whole light cycle before my side will get a green. I hate that. Waste of time, waste of gas idling, bad for the air to have people idling....if it had been midday with nobody around I might have run the light, but there were too many people on the other street to risk it in case one was an unmarked cop or some such. I wish the detection loop could trigger the green mid-cycle. Doesn't need to be an arrow. The current signal head there is the usual Virginia doghouse (huge improvement from when I moved to my house in 2001 and neither direction had an arrow, just straight green circles both at the same time).
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

tradephoric

Part of the problem is duel (and even triple) left turn lanes are becoming more common to combat congestion.  Agencies are extremely hesitant to provide permissive left turns at intersections with dual left turns.  Sure, you get increased capacity at 5PM but at 2AM drivers are needlessly waiting at a protected left turn.


1995hoo


Quote from: tradephoric on April 02, 2015, 11:29:33 AM
Part of the problem is duel (and even triple) left turn lanes are becoming more common to combat congestion.  Agencies are extremely hesitant to provide permissive left turns at intersections with dual left turns.  Sure, you get increased capacity at 5PM but at 2AM drivers are needlessly waiting at a protected left turn.

This is understandable especially when there's also a dual turn in the other direction. Sometimes it's hard enough to see around large vehicle in a single permissive turn lane. Dual lanes would just make that worse.

Regarding your very valid point about late nights, I miss the days when some traffic lights around here used to go on flash overnight, especially lights outside strip malls and the like. The street would have a flashing yellow and the shopping area a flashing red.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

roadman65

Quote from: texaskdog on April 02, 2015, 11:25:07 AM
I hate the intersections that have the left arrow AND the traffic going straight.  It turns red and the other direction does the same.  I prefer the MN signals:  The left turners go first and when the line subsides all straight traffic goes.  Left turners can still go, unprotected.
Florida has been doing that for years.  I argued with a friend of mine (now retired for health reasons) who worked for Orange County Traffic Engineering in Signal Maintenance, that the way signals in Florida now have the left turn arrow at the same time as the through sucks.  He said to me that no matter where the left turn cycles, the same amount of red and green time exists.  I tend to disagree as the timing in his department is not doing that.

What is worse is the placement in rotation for the left turn protected left changes throughout the day.  Sometimes its at first when the through movement goes green and then at another part of the day its at the end of the through cycle.  Sometimes it changes from day to day as one day on John Young Parkway in Orlando at Town Center Boulevard it will be at the start of the through and go there the same time another day (weekday I mind you, as I can see the difference between Saturday and Monday for example) it will be at the end of the through movement.

To get to the OP, yes I hate it when we are forced to sit there and wait for a light to change when there is absolutely NO oncoming traffic!  It happens a lot to me and yes I can see part time left turn signals at those times in the day.  In fact Delaware does it where they will flash the red ball for the protected left turn signal and allow the motorist to turn left at certain off peak times after a full stop that no one ever makes.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

Bickendan

Quote from: 1995hoo on April 02, 2015, 11:40:19 AM

Quote from: tradephoric on April 02, 2015, 11:29:33 AM
Part of the problem is duel (and even triple) left turn lanes are becoming more common to combat congestion.  Agencies are extremely hesitant to provide permissive left turns at intersections with dual left turns.  Sure, you get increased capacity at 5PM but at 2AM drivers are needlessly waiting at a protected left turn.

This is understandable especially when there's also a dual turn in the other direction. Sometimes it's hard enough to see around large vehicle in a single permissive turn lane. Dual lanes would just make that worse.

Regarding your very valid point about late nights, I miss the days when some traffic lights around here used to go on flash overnight, especially lights outside strip malls and the like. The street would have a flashing yellow and the shopping area a flashing red.
Alternative solution is for sensors to automatically trip the signal the moment a car (or bike) hits the sensor during the overnight phases.

roadman65

Or go back to flashing the signals at night.  We do that for some between 2 AM and 5 AM on Orange Blossom Trail and allow free movements on OBT and just a normal STOP sign type of deal for the side roads.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

jeffandnicole

#15
Quote from: Zeffy on April 02, 2015, 09:54:40 AM
This intersection has caused me to wait UNTIL SOMEONE PULLED UP ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION BEFORE CHANGING. That's NOT okay. It took about 3 1/2 minutes before the signal did change, and considering the city I was in I thought about blowing through it when there was nothing remotely dangerous about doing it, but I've lately been seeing more actual Trenton PD cars scattered throughout the streets, so I didn't feel like chancing it.

But I agree with bugo - these things need a fucking change. I can't believe I had to sit in a turn lane for nearly 4 minutes because the cycle was dependent on someone being at the opposite side of the intersection.

Quote from: Big John on April 02, 2015, 10:12:15 AM
^^ I only see traffic detectors in the pavement in only 1 of the left-turn lanes and I don't see any optical detectors.  Somebody dropped the ball there.

I travel thru this intersection at least 4 times a week.  I'm guessing what you experienced is called "a malfunction". 

In my experiences, this intersection works normally.  Obviously, when motorists are in the opposing left turn lanes, both sides will get the left turn arrow.  But I've been at the intersection where only one side or the other has a vehicle, and just that left turn light has turned green.

As far as the lack of traffic detectors, take a look at GSV again. They are there on both sides.  The intersection was recently reconstructed and new pavement put down on one side of the intersection which allows them to be more easily seen, but they exist on both left turn lanes.

https://goo.gl/maps/2Nvtl & https://goo.gl/maps/EHL03

It's also a good time to bring up this: If something doesn't appear right, it probably isn't.  I don't know of an intersection anywhere that is designed to mandate traffic be on both sides of the intersection, because you could go for several hours at night without another car needing to make an opposing movement.

hbelkins

Sometimes it seems like protected left turns are installed at random. You'll go through three or four intersections with permitted/protected (doghouses) or FYA's, then all of a sudden you hit one with a protected left. I've started to figure out that sight distance issues are probably the reason most protected lefts are installed amongst a sequence of doghouses or FYAs.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Pete from Boston

I find this to be a pretty minor inconvenience, and that may very well be because it seems to be written in the local DNA here that anyone who can race into the intersection first has the right-of-way to turn left, never mind how close or heavy the oncoming traffic.  That drives me so up a wall that I'll take a few minutes delay in my day to hold these impatient children someplace safe until the rest of us are out of the way.

spooky

Quote from: Pete from Boston on April 02, 2015, 01:26:25 PM
I find this to be a pretty minor inconvenience, and that may very well be because it seems to be written in the local DNA here that anyone who can race into the intersection first has the right-of-way to turn left, never mind how close or heavy the oncoming traffic.  That drives me so up a wall that I'll take a few minutes delay in my day to hold these impatient children someplace safe until the rest of us are out of the way.

Ah yes, the Massachusetts left. Remember, the right-of-way belongs to whoever more aggressively pursues it.

kkt

I'm more bothered by the lack of protected left turn arrows at intersections that need them.  Traffic is so heavy there's no chance to turn left during the green phase, so people wanting to turn run the yellow and collide with oncoming traffic also running the yellow.

tradephoric

Quote from: 1995hoo on April 02, 2015, 11:40:19 AM

Quote from: tradephoric on April 02, 2015, 11:29:33 AM
Part of the problem is duel (and even triple) left turn lanes are becoming more common to combat congestion.  Agencies are extremely hesitant to provide permissive left turns at intersections with dual left turns.  Sure, you get increased capacity at 5PM but at 2AM drivers are needlessly waiting at a protected left turn.

This is understandable especially when there's also a dual turn in the other direction. Sometimes it's hard enough to see around large vehicle in a single permissive turn lane. Dual lanes would just make that worse.

Regarding your very valid point about late nights, I miss the days when some traffic lights around here used to go on flash overnight, especially lights outside strip malls and the like. The street would have a flashing yellow and the shopping area a flashing red.

Not to rub it in, but it's commonplace for signals to flash at night in SE Michigan. There are 15 traffic signals on US24 between I-75 & Telegraph.  Of these 15 signals, 11 of them flash at night.  Many of the signals that go into flash are full blown 4-phase signals with left turn phases.   Even the I-75 off-ramp signals will go into flash at night.

Bickendan

Quote from: kkt on April 02, 2015, 02:00:25 PM
I'm more bothered by the lack of protected left turn arrows at intersections that need them.  Traffic is so heavy there's no chance to turn left during the green phase, so people wanting to turn run the yellow and collide with oncoming traffic also running the yellow.

Just happened the other day at SE 26th and Powell (US 26) here in Portland. Car tried to turn left from 26th onto Powell, hit/got hit by a car running the yellow or red going the other way. Made worse that Powell Park's on one corner of the intersection and Cleveland High School's on the opposite corner.

texaskdog

Quote from: 1995hoo on April 02, 2015, 11:29:10 AM
This morning I got stuck at the light leaving my neighborhood because I got there just 15 or 20 seconds too late: Traffic coming the other way on my street had gotten a green and if I'm not there before that green comes on, the light makes me wait through the whole light cycle before my side will get a green. I hate that. Waste of time, waste of gas idling, bad for the air to have people idling....if it had been midday with nobody around I might have run the light, but there were too many people on the other street to risk it in case one was an unmarked cop or some such. I wish the detection loop could trigger the green mid-cycle. Doesn't need to be an arrow. The current signal head there is the usual Virginia doghouse (huge improvement from when I moved to my house in 2001 and neither direction had an arrow, just straight green circles both at the same time).

The light by my apartment is red for 1:40.  The cycle rarely has a car going through at 6:20 am.  When DST first kicked in the lights blinked for 2 days, it was SO NICE!!!

Scott5114

Norman has the opposite problem. We have a bunch of intersections that go to FYA during peak hours when a protected left would be really handy. So you get one car creep into the intersection, get stuck there while tons of oncoming traffic passes, and then either finally go in the last few seconds of the cycle once the herd passes, or else have to book it out of the intersection when the light turns red and cross traffic gets a green. It's especially maddening because green arrows are present in the signal heads, they just never come on.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

myosh_tino

Quote from: Bickendan on April 02, 2015, 12:13:18 PM
Alternative solution is for sensors to automatically trip the signal the moment a car (or bike) hits the sensor during the overnight phases.

That's how it's done, for the most part, in California where the vast majority of left turns are protected.
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.