News:

Per request, I added a Forum Status page while revamping the AARoads back end.
- Alex

Main Menu

Smallest Cities Served by 3DI's

Started by mwb1848, December 14, 2015, 02:07:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

briantroutman

Personally, I would base "smallest cities"  on metro area served. In the I-176 example, If the city of Reading had never existed and Cumru Township was a rural outpost in a largely uninhabited portion of Berks County, I don't think anyone here would argue that I-176 would have been built. Without question, I-176 exists to serve Reading, even if it does not actually cross the city's borders.


empirestate

Quote from: Pete from Boston on December 17, 2015, 04:44:56 PM
My understanding of the spirit of the thread was that the OP was looking for the smallest maximum city size for a given three-digit Interstate.

That's a succinct way of putting it. And I also don't believe the spirit of the thread was to limit the answer only to municipalities specifically called cities, but rather to include any like municipality, or even an unincorporated settlement, if such constitutes the largest place served by the route. It's likely that it didn't even occur to the OP that this might not be a so-called "city" (like Hennepin, IL, to my mind still the clear winner).


golden eagle

Quote from: Darkchylde on December 15, 2015, 11:07:46 PM
Quote from: US 41 on December 14, 2015, 03:13:28 PM
Lake Charles, LA - I-210
I-510, which serves Chalmette, LA in a bit of an I-535 situation (starts in New Orleans but doesn't really serve it as much as existing to funnel traffic to/from Chalmette) has that beat, with Chalmette only having 16,751 people as of 2010.

One of the control cities for I-310 is Boutte, an unincorporated area of just over 3000. Houma was later added as a control.

Billy F 1988

As stated before, I-115 in Butte and this "pseudo" I-315 in Great Falls. I call I-315 a pseudo short 3DI interstate because there are no signs with I-315 on them. It's a short chute just off I-15 at exit 278. There is an exit 0 that connects 14th Street SW but once you approach 6th Street SW and Fox Farm Road, it defaults as I-15 Business.
Finally upgraded to Expressway after, what, seven or so years on this forum? Took a dadgum while, but, I made it!

DandyDan

How about South Sioux City, NE for I-129?  Only 13,353 people.  Dakota City, on the south side of I-129, only has 1,919.
MORE FUN THAN HUMANLY THOUGHT POSSIBLE

empirestate

Quote from: DandyDan on December 21, 2015, 08:17:30 AM
How about South Sioux City, NE for I-129?  Only 13,353 people.  Dakota City, on the south side of I-129, only has 1,919.

Yeah, but Sioux City has over 80,000. Still a small-ish city to have its own 3di, but not at the extreme end.

jp the roadgeek

I-395 in CT/MA's biggest city is Norwich, which has 40,000 people. Otherwise, most of the towns along it are tiny.  I-380 in PA really doesn't serve a city; it just acts as a connection between I-80 and I-81/I-84.
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

hbelkins

I would argue that I-380 serves Scranton.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

NE2

I-395 arguably serves Worcester (the only reason it doesn't actually enter it is that the Masspike was built to bypass Worcester inside of along Route 9 through downtown, putting the Pike's Worcester interchange south of the city).
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

cl94

Quote from: NE2 on December 21, 2015, 02:51:05 PM
I-395 arguably serves Worcester (the only reason it doesn't actually enter it is that the Masspike was built to bypass Worcester inside of along Route 9 through downtown, putting the Pike's Worcester interchange south of the city).

Agree. It's effectively a southern extension of I-290.

Quote from: hbelkins on December 21, 2015, 02:37:24 PM
I would argue that I-380 serves Scranton.

Agree. The interchange is 2 miles from the city line.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

wolfiefrick

I-270 in St Louis serves Des Peres (8,466), Kirkwood (27,540), Green Park (2,622), Moline Acres (2,422), Town & Country (10,860), and Edwardsville (24,293).

empirestate

Quote from: wolfiefrick on December 24, 2015, 03:39:04 PM
I-270 in St Louis serves Des Peres (8,466), Kirkwood (27,540), Green Park (2,622), Moline Acres (2,422), Town & Country (10,860), and Edwardsville (24,293).

...and St. Louis (319,294).

wolfiefrick

Should have been more clear. I-270 does not ever enter the city of St. Louis, it only stays in St. Louis county and serves the cities i mentioned. The population of the St. Louis metro area is somewhere from 3 to 4 million.


iPhone

bassoon1986

But isn't that missing the point of the thread? The loop was obviously built because the city of St. Louis exists.

tdindy88

I-270 actually does pass through the far northern tip of the St. Louis city limits on the north side right after crossing the Mississippi River.

empirestate

Exactly; I don't think there's any plausible argument that I-270 doesn't serve St. Louis, whether or not it enters the city limits. So you would definitely need to count it against the "smallest largest city" criterion.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.