Interstate Highway Question

Started by Alex, December 29, 2015, 06:14:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Nature Boy

Why hasn't I-585 been decommissioned yet? It really serves no actual purpose at this point.


noelbotevera

Quote from: The Nature Boy on January 02, 2016, 09:33:59 PM
Why hasn't I-585 been decommissioned yet? It really serves no actual purpose at this point.
Because SCDOT wants to extend it to I-85.

Pleased to meet you
Hope you guessed my name

(Recently hacked. A human operates this account now!)

pianocello

Quote from: TravelingBethelite on January 02, 2016, 08:07:48 PM
Another question: was/is there a section of Interstate that doesn't connect to any other? As far as I know, no. This does not include highways that will be as they are constructed. Asking for a friend.  :cool:

Very recently, I want to say one of the I-69 suffixed routes in South Texas was on its own, so to speak, before I-2 became signed (69C, maybe? Not sure about the chronology of everything down there). Even now, the system of I-2, I-69C, and I-69E is disconnected from the rest, but that's only temporary, and it doesn't really answer your question.
Davenport, IA -> Valparaiso, IN -> Ames, IA -> Orlando, FL -> Gainesville, FL -> Evansville, IN

SteveG1988

Roads Clinched

I55,I82,I84(E&W)I88(W),I87(N),I81,I64,I74(W),I72,I57,I24,I65,I59,I12,I71,I77,I76(E&W),I70,I79,I85,I86(W),I27,I16,I97,I96,I43,I41,

NE2

Quote from: pianocello on January 03, 2016, 01:45:42 AM
Quote from: TravelingBethelite on January 02, 2016, 08:07:48 PM
This does not include highways that will be as they are constructed.
Very recently, I want to say one of the I-69 suffixed routes in South Texas was on its own, so to speak, before I-2 became signed (69C, maybe? Not sure about the chronology of everything down there).
Quote from: SteveG1988 on January 03, 2016, 10:07:50 AM
Hawaii interstates.
Which one doesn't connect to any others? None of them, that's which one.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

The Nature Boy

Quote from: noelbotevera on January 02, 2016, 10:04:20 PM
Quote from: The Nature Boy on January 02, 2016, 09:33:59 PM
Why hasn't I-585 been decommissioned yet? It really serves no actual purpose at this point.
Because SCDOT wants to extend it to I-85.

Decommission it until they actually do that. Let SC call it SC Highway 585 if they want to.

Mapmikey

I-585 is fully signed in both directions along US 176 from west of I-85 Bus to just short of I-85 (1 at grade intersection adjacent to I-85), including on the ramps from both directions on I-85.

There are also mile markers 1-3 where mile 0 would be at I-85.

On the other end, the I-585 posting on Pine St leaving US 29 now says TO I-585 instead of NORTH I-585, but there is still at least one 585 NORTH posting on Pine St well before the actual freeway begins at the US 221 interchange.

If I-85 Bus were I-685 this would not be an issue and if SCDOT wanted to connect 585 out to 85 they should've had a different interchange design with US 176 which is a simple diamond in a small geographic footprint.

Mike

davewiecking

Quote from: TravelingBethelite on January 02, 2016, 08:07:48 PM
Another question: was/is there a section of Interstate that doesn't connect to any other? As far as I know, no. This does not include highways that will be as they are constructed. Asking for a friend.  :cool:
I-170 in Baltimore never connected to another Interstate, and has since been removed from the system.

wolfiefrick




Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.