News:

Per request, I added a Forum Status page while revamping the AARoads back end.
- Alex

Main Menu

I-11 to be signed from I-215 to AZ border

Started by Sub-Urbanite, September 09, 2017, 04:34:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions

KeithE4Phx

#75
October 15, 2017, 12:48:18 PM  
Quote from: mrsman on October 15, 2017, 08:36:33 AM
Quote from: pumpkineater2 on October 09, 2017, 12:21:49 AM
Quote from: dvferyance on September 13, 2017, 06:04:19 PM
This number makes no sense. Should be part of I-17 or at least I-13.

Maybe I-17W?  :colorful:

I-11 cannot be part of I-17 as it is planned to eventually be built to the Phoenix area.  If I-11 only connects LV to I-40, I-17 is possible, but it would require a very long multiplex along I-40 between Kingman and Flagstaff. 

The only multiplex that will happen is the I-11/40 duplex from Kingman to about 25 miles east, replacing the one currently with US 93.  Nobody's proposing any changes to I-17 or any other Arizona interstate.
"Oh, so you hate your job? Well, why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called "EVERYBODY!" They meet at the bar." -- Drew Carey

Aerobird

#76
October 15, 2017, 08:00:27 PM  
Quote from: mrsman on October 15, 2017, 08:36:33 AM
Quote from: pumpkineater2 on October 09, 2017, 12:21:49 AMMaybe I-17W?  :colorful:

I-11 cannot be part of I-17 as it is planned to eventually be built to the Phoenix area.  If I-11 only connects LV to I-40, I-17 is possible, but it would require a very long multiplex along I-40 between Kingman and Flagstaff.

...I think you missed the joke.

I-17W.
Rule 37. There is no 'overkill'. There is only 'open fire' and 'I need to reload'.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions