News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Metric Signs

Started by KillerTux, September 14, 2010, 11:22:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

hm insulators

Quote from: realjd on September 19, 2010, 08:03:54 PM



You all know the quick, dirty conversion for temperature, right? Take the Celsius, double it, and add 30. It's not exact, but it gets you close enough.

I just go by remembering that each 5 degrees of Celsius is about 9 degrees Farenheit; each 10 degreesC is 18 degreesF. Forget the fancy formulas!
Remember: If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.

I'd rather be a child of the road than a son of a ditch.


At what age do you tell a highway that it's been adopted?


corco

#51
QuoteWhereas 88 is spot on.

Just for kicks, though: The sign reads 55/90.
You're doing 90, cop pulls you over.
"You know how fast you were going, son?"
"Um, 90 kmh. Why?"
"Exactly. Speed limit's 55, not 56 and a quarter. We go by the lower number in these here parts. Gonna need to see yer license, insurance and registration and I'm gonna need you step outside your ve-hic-le."

If the sign says 90 km/h is legal, the cop has to honor that number. That's an open and shut case in traffic court. Beyond that, if that arose and a Canadian were unable to go to traffic court, that'd be great because we'd be getting free foreign money. That's good for the economy! If the sign isn't legally binding, let's say the speed limit in metric is 110 km/h, so it's a big ticket but not so big that we waste domestic resources jailing the foreigner.

If that makes the Canadian government mad, well, so? That's a great excuse to finally take over their fine country and make it America as it should be. Manifest Destiny! 54 40 or fight! America and Canada as one. Wow. I'm aroused.

agentsteel53

Quote from: corco on September 28, 2010, 09:13:09 PMWow. I'm aroused.

I for one welcome our new Canadian overlords.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Alps

Quote from: Mr_Northside on September 16, 2010, 02:26:49 PM
Quote from: iwishiwascanadian on September 14, 2010, 11:30:59 PM
I haven't seen BGS's signed exclusively signed in metric, but I have seen others. 

I can't completely recall if they were exclusively metric, and don't know if it's still that way, but on our way back from our 1st Lebowskifest in Louisville, we ended up on I-265 from I-64 to I-71, and I think everything was in metric.  (Though the only border that's close to is the state of Indiana).
I just started going through my Kentucky photos. I found three metric signs on this route: 71 north, 841 north, U turn, 265 west. One was on 841N, one on 841S (both on the stub part), one for Exit 30 on 265W. Didn't see any others, so maybe they were all EB.

Hot Rod Hootenanny

Quote from: AlpsROADS on March 12, 2011, 08:21:02 AM
Quote from: Mr_Northside on September 16, 2010, 02:26:49 PM
Quote from: iwishiwascanadian on September 14, 2010, 11:30:59 PM
I haven't seen BGS's signed exclusively signed in metric, but I have seen others. 

I can't completely recall if they were exclusively metric, and don't know if it's still that way, but on our way back from our 1st Lebowskifest in Louisville, we ended up on I-265 from I-64 to I-71, and I think everything was in metric.  (Though the only border that's close to is the state of Indiana).
I just started going through my Kentucky photos. I found three metric signs on this route: 71 north, 841 north, U turn, 265 west. One was on 841N, one on 841S (both on the stub part), one for Exit 30 on 265W. Didn't see any others, so maybe they were all EB.

I have photos of signs for exits 30 & 32 along I-265 SB (CW from I-71) that show metric and standard mileage.
Please, don't sue Alex & Andy over what I wrote above

CanesFan27

Metric Sign I came across along the Osceola Parkway on June 6th.

IMG_1024 by Adam Prince, on Flickr

freebrickproductions

Quote from: CanesFan27 on June 14, 2025, 03:26:00 PMMetric Sign I came across along the Osceola Parkway on June 6th.

IMG_1024 by Adam Prince, on Flickr

Honestly, given the number of folks from other countries who are probably driving that way for Disney World, it makes sense that the sign is in dual units.
It's all fun & games until someone summons Cthulhu and brings about the end of the world.

I also collect traffic lights, road signs, fans, and railroad crossing equipment.

Art in avatar by Moncatto (18+)!

(They/Them)

Scott5114

Too bad whoever made it doesn't have the self-control to lay off the horizontal stretch button.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

LilianaUwU

Quote from: corco on September 28, 2010, 09:13:09 PMIf that makes the Canadian government mad, well, so? That's a great excuse to finally take over their fine country and make it America as it should be. Manifest Destiny! 54 40 or fight! America and Canada as one. Wow. I'm aroused.
This aged... well, yeah. This aged.
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her. Also, I'm an admin on the AARoads Wiki.

mgk920

hehehe

Also, I really do like the "800 m" part.

Mike

TXtoNJ

Quote from: mgk920 on June 15, 2025, 01:35:23 PMhehehe

Also, I really do like the "800 m" part.

Mike

The nicest part of metric road signs is the scalability without fractions. Especially since a 1600 m "metric mile" divides so easily that most US signs would only need decals to convert.

pderocco

Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 19, 2025, 11:46:33 AM
Quote from: mgk920 on June 15, 2025, 01:35:23 PMhehehe

Also, I really do like the "800 m" part.

Mike
We use feet. I've seen lots of signs with distances like 1000 ft on them. I don't think I've seen any signs with yards, though.

The nicest part of metric road signs is the scalability without fractions. Especially since a 1600 m "metric mile" divides so easily that most US signs would only need decals to convert.

Big John

^^ In English units, most lengths in Civil Engineering highway plans are measured in feet and decimal feet to 2 units. The only thing measured in yards is earth excavation, which use cubic yards.

With that signs use feet, or in longer lengths miles (which is done in fractions)

ElishaGOtis

Where did Florida once ever post metric speed limit signs other than the ones near FGCU? I couldn't find any evidence of a mass-use of these signs other than a few older pictures and a few older speed limit signs saying MPH.
I can drive 55 ONLY when it makes sense.

NOTE: Opinions expressed here on AARoads are solely my own and do not represent or reflect the statements, opinions, or decisions of any agency. Any official information I share will be quoted from another source.

mgk920

Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 19, 2025, 11:46:33 AM
Quote from: mgk920 on June 15, 2025, 01:35:23 PMhehehe

Also, I really do like the "800 m" part.

Mike

The nicest part of metric road signs is the scalability without fractions. Especially since a 1600 m "metric mile" divides so easily that most US signs would only need decals to convert.

Yea, 'fractions' are soooo old fashioned and obsolete.

Mike

formulanone

#65
Quote from: ElishaGOtis on June 19, 2025, 09:29:15 PMWhere did Florida once ever post metric speed limit signs other than the ones near FGCU? I couldn't find any evidence of a mass-use of these signs other than a few older pictures and a few older speed limit signs saying MPH.

Florida went through a short phase in the mid-1980s with dual signage, usually on new construction. Two I can recall were on/near Sawgrass Expressway and its nearby access roads (completed in 1986), and so did the final stages of I-95 in Martin County (finished in 1987). I'm sure there were others since road construction and expansion was seemingly everywhere in Florida during the 1980s.



As you can see, it should have been 64 (accurate) or 65 (rounded) km/h. I think I saw one straggler hang on until 2008 or so.

This popped up on Corkscrew Road, east of Fort Myers, but likely not an FDOT install on a County Road:


1995hoo

Quote from: Big John on June 19, 2025, 07:53:15 PM^^ In English units, most lengths in Civil Engineering highway plans are measured in feet and decimal feet to 2 units. The only thing measured in yards is earth excavation, which use cubic yards.

With that signs use feet, or in longer lengths miles (which is done in fractions)

The Brits have road signs posted in yards. I assume the first one seen below is somewhere in Wales.



"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

kphoger

Quote from: 1995hoo on June 20, 2025, 12:31:32 PMThe Brits have road signs posted in yards. I assume the first one seen below is somewhere in Wales.

Furlongs are better.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/AzzNPRQoJNzwzdge6

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

pderocco

Quote from: kphoger on June 20, 2025, 01:31:59 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on June 20, 2025, 12:31:32 PMThe Brits have road signs posted in yards. I assume the first one seen below is somewhere in Wales.

Furlongs are better.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/AzzNPRQoJNzwzdge6

and the speed limits are in furlongs/fortnight.

TXtoNJ

Quote from: mgk920 on June 20, 2025, 12:15:12 PM
Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 19, 2025, 11:46:33 AM
Quote from: mgk920 on June 15, 2025, 01:35:23 PMhehehe

Also, I really do like the "800 m" part.

Mike

The nicest part of metric road signs is the scalability without fractions. Especially since a 1600 m "metric mile" divides so easily that most US signs would only need decals to convert.

Yea, 'fractions' are soooo old fashioned and obsolete.

Mike

Fractions are great for doing math, and horrible for estimating (which is what you're doing when driving). The classic example is when A&W tried to sell a 1/3 lb burger, and customers didn't like it because they thought they were getting less meat than a quarter-pounder.

kphoger

Quote from: TXtoNJ on June 20, 2025, 05:29:52 PMFractions are great for doing math, and horrible for estimating (which is what you're doing when driving). The classic example is when A&W tried to sell a 1/3 lb burger, and customers didn't like it because they thought they were getting less meat than a quarter-pounder.

I can't find my older post right now, but I once attempted to track down the actual study that supposedly found all those customers thinking a third was smaller than a quarter, and I was unable.  As memory serves, the trail runs cold at hearsay in a book by Alfred Taubman.  I remain unconvinced that the guy didn't just make it up, or that the focus group wasn't a made up of a dozen high school dropouts.

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

Big John

Per a 2014 paywalled New York Times article:

QuoteOne of the most vivid arithmetic failings displayed by Americans occurred in the early 1980s, when the A&W restaurant chain released a new hamburger to rival the McDonald's Quarter Pounder. With a third-pound of beef, the A&W burger had more meat than the Quarter Pounder; in taste tests, customers preferred A&W's burger. And it was less expensive. A lavish A&W television and radio marketing campaign cited these benefits. Yet instead of leaping at the great value, customers snubbed it.

Only when the company held customer focus groups did it become clear why. The Third Pounder presented the American public with a test in fractions. And we failed. Misunderstanding the value of one-third, customers believed they were being overcharged. Why, they asked the researchers, should they pay the same amount for a third of a pound of meat as they did for a quarter-pound of meat at McDonald's. The "4" in "¼," larger than the "3" in "⅓," led them astray.

kphoger

Quote from: kphoger on June 20, 2025, 06:02:58 PMI once attempted to track down the actual study
Quote from: Big John on June 20, 2025, 06:22:32 PMNew York Times article

As I said.

All the news article did was repeat what Taubman claimed.  I've never been able to identify any such study.  The details of what I had researched are fuzzy to me now, but I seem to remember that I did read somewhere the name of the group that's purported to have conducted the study, but was never able to corroborate it as fact.

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

formulanone

#73
Maybe they should have remarketed it as: The Five Ouncer, 'cause 5 is more than 4 and 3, you see.

Or perhaps there were just more McDonald's locations.

Heck, even in some of my high-school and college math classes, the muttered phrase "I hate fractions" was oft-repeated.

GaryA

Quote from: pderocco on June 20, 2025, 03:32:39 PM
Quote from: kphoger on June 20, 2025, 01:31:59 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on June 20, 2025, 12:31:32 PMThe Brits have road signs posted in yards. I assume the first one seen below is somewhere in Wales.

Furlongs are better.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/AzzNPRQoJNzwzdge6

and the speed limits are in furlongs/fortnight.

I remember a computer OS parameter measured in "microfortnights" (apparently it was supposed to be seconds, but a bug messed up the timing and they found that this was close)



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.