News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Arizona Looking to Dump Metric Signage on I-19

Started by Zonie, October 04, 2014, 08:00:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Scott5114

Quote from: dbz77 on July 06, 2025, 12:20:10 PMmmHg is clearly metric.

It uses a metric unit, but the official SI unit of pressure is the bar (which equals air pressure at sea level). Meteorology typically uses mbars for all air-pressure readings on the back end, and only translates them to inHg when communicating with the general public.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef


kphoger

Quote from: US81 on October 18, 2014, 04:02:31 PMHealthcare is (usually) metric ... but uses English for pressures (mmHg) ...
Quote from: dbz77 on July 06, 2025, 12:20:10 PMmmHg is clearly metric.
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 06, 2025, 09:10:25 PMIt uses a metric unit, but the official SI unit of pressure is the bar (which equals air pressure at sea level).

So actually, he was incorrect on two counts:

(1)  mmHg is a metric unit, therefore its use is not an exception to the rule of using metric.  (Note that he did not claim it was an SI unit.)

(2)  mmHg is not the English Customary unit for pressure.  Imperial uses psi.

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

hotdogPi

Quote from: Scott5114 on July 06, 2025, 09:10:25 PM
Quote from: dbz77 on July 06, 2025, 12:20:10 PMmmHg is clearly metric.

It uses a metric unit, but the official SI unit of pressure is the bar (which equals air pressure at sea level). Meteorology typically uses mbars for all air-pressure readings on the back end, and only translates them to inHg when communicating with the general public.

I seem to remember the SI unit being the pascal, defined as 1 kg/(m·s²). One bar is defined as exactly 100,000 pascals (which still works with SI because it's a power of 10); air pressure at sea level is pretty close to this (but not exact) at 101,325 pascals.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 50
MA 22, 35, 40, 53, 79, 107, 109, 126, 138, 141, 159
NH 27, 78, 111A(E); CA 90; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32, 320; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, WA 202; QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 36

kkt

Quote from: kphoger on July 07, 2025, 09:35:18 AM
Quote from: US81 on October 18, 2014, 04:02:31 PMHealthcare is (usually) metric ... but uses English for pressures (mmHg) ...
Quote from: dbz77 on July 06, 2025, 12:20:10 PMmmHg is clearly metric.
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 06, 2025, 09:10:25 PMIt uses a metric unit, but the official SI unit of pressure is the bar (which equals air pressure at sea level).

So actually, he was incorrect on two counts:

(1)  mmHg is a metric unit, therefore its use is not an exception to the rule of using metric.  (Note that he did not claim it was an SI unit.)

(2)  mmHg is not the English Customary unit for pressure.  Imperial uses psi.

Inches of mercury used to be used for weather reporting.

GaryV

Quote from: kkt on July 07, 2025, 01:13:40 PMInches of mercury used to be used for weather reporting

Weather.com still does. And I'm sure that's not the only place I've seen it.

kphoger

Quote from: Scott5114 on July 06, 2025, 09:10:25 PMMeteorology typically uses mbars for all air-pressure readings on the back end, and only translates them to inHg when communicating with the general public.
Quote from: kphoger on July 07, 2025, 09:35:18 AMmmHg is not the English Customary unit for pressure.  Imperial uses psi.
Quote from: kkt on July 07, 2025, 01:13:40 PMInches of mercury used to be used for weather reporting.

Yes, as Scott had already mentioned.  But, of course, this does not change the fact that mmHg is not the Customary unit.

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

US 395

Quote from: Quillz on June 09, 2025, 08:00:57 PMIn a fictional world, 17 and 19 would be one long interstate.

In a fictional world, it could've been Interstate 15. If you go north from the end of Interstate 17 in Flagstaff, you'd eventually run into 15 and SLC. The way 15 goes south from there (more like southwest), that could've been an Interstate 11. Still fits the overall grid.🤷🏻�♂️

The Ghostbuster


Max Rockatansky

Quote from: The Ghostbuster on July 13, 2025, 08:54:03 PMIn a non-fictional world, we have this: https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?board=20.0.

If we are living in a simulation doesn't that mean what we call the "real world" is actually also fictional? 

kkt

Quote from: US 395 on July 13, 2025, 06:21:50 PM
Quote from: Quillz on June 09, 2025, 08:00:57 PMIn a fictional world, 17 and 19 would be one long interstate.

In a fictional world, it could've been Interstate 15. If you go north from the end of Interstate 17 in Flagstaff, you'd eventually run into 15 and SLC. The way 15 goes south from there (more like southwest), that could've been an Interstate 11. Still fits the overall grid.🤷🏻�♂️

If you go north past the end of I-17 you run into very rough, sparsely populated country, and then Lake Powell.  The need for interstates is not a perfect grid - Salt Lake City to Las Vegas to L.A. is a diagonal, but it is heavily used.

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on July 13, 2025, 09:41:02 PMIf we are living in a simulation doesn't that mean what we call the "real world" is actually also fictional? 

Are you getting all Matrixy on us?

Max Rockatansky

Nah, I had the idea of some weird alien kid playing a hyper detailed version of The Sims in mind.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.