Ohio

Started by iBallasticwolf2, August 29, 2015, 08:18:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Ghostbuster

How many homes and businesses would have to be demolished to implement each alternative?


vtk

Quote from: seicer on July 15, 2025, 11:26:14 AMThe decorative fencing installed along Interstate 670 during its reconstruction around 23 years ago will be replaced with vandal-protective fencing, including the Gooddale and High Street caps, next year (ODOT). The decorative fencing was a compromise with community leaders who had initially balked at vandal-protective chain-link fencing. The base of the fencing will also be repaired. Just a visual walk-around showed some deterioration of the fencing and concrete bases because of salt intrusion. Still, it would be disappointing to see this replaced with some generic fencing. Public commenting is still open.


Has vandalism been a problem? How are the existing fences not as protective against vandalism than the proposed chain link?
Wait, it's all Ohio? Always has been.

GCrites

It looks like they've added chain-link fence fabric to the decorative fencing already on the Goodale Cap.

seicer

Was it the result of people throwing things onto the interstate? Those fences were quite tall. I haven't walked over Gooddale in a while.

vtk

(Good ale, not good dale. Only one d.)
Wait, it's all Ohio? Always has been.

TempoNick


74/171FAN

I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

Travel Mapping: https://travelmapping.net/user/?units=miles&u=markkos1992
Mob-Rule:  https://mob-rule.com/user/markkos1992

TempoNick

Quote from: 74/171FAN on July 16, 2025, 08:14:52 AMAnyway, an update from the I-71/I-670 crash in May also posted last night.

They won't give a name. I thought the whole point of putting people's names in the media was for the ridicule and to teach people not to do stupid things again.

PColumbus73

Quote from: TempoNick on July 16, 2025, 09:43:16 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on July 16, 2025, 08:14:52 AMAnyway, an update from the I-71/I-670 crash in May also posted last night.

They won't give a name. I thought the whole point of putting people's names in the media was for the ridicule and to teach people not to do stupid things again.

I feel like they should have been charged with leaving the scene. It makes me wonder how the other driver's auto insurance determined who was 'at fault'.

vtk

Quote from: NBC4the Interstate 70/71 split in downtown Columbus has been an active construction zone for decades.

No, it hasn't. If you consider all of the freeways all around downtown, yeah there was always something going on somewhere almost continuously from the early 90s to 2003, and again from 2011 to now. But if you look closer, that's been a construction zone here, then a construction zone there, et c. Characterizing it as one continuously-operated construction zone is just not true.
Wait, it's all Ohio? Always has been.

TempoNick

Quote from: PColumbus73 on July 16, 2025, 02:48:13 PM
Quote from: TempoNick on July 16, 2025, 09:43:16 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on July 16, 2025, 08:14:52 AMAnyway, an update from the I-71/I-670 crash in May also posted last night.

They won't give a name. I thought the whole point of putting people's names in the media was for the ridicule and to teach people not to do stupid things again.

I feel like they should have been charged with leaving the scene. It makes me wonder how the other driver's auto insurance determined who was 'at fault'.
Quote from: vtk on July 16, 2025, 04:06:32 PM
Quote from: NBC4the Interstate 70/71 split in downtown Columbus has been an active construction zone for decades.

No, it hasn't. If you consider all of the freeways all around downtown, yeah there was always something going on somewhere almost continuously from the early 90s to 2003, and again from 2011 to now. But if you look closer, that's been a construction zone here, then a construction zone there, et c. Characterizing it as one continuously-operated construction zone is just not true.

All those flyover ramps and the intertwining of I-70 and I-71 seems like overkill to me. I wonder if the project would have been easier if their focus would have been on upgrading I-670 for I-71 through traffic. It seems to me that if I-71 follows that path, it takes traffic off of the split. And there is so much bad design on the old section, it's just begging to be reconfigured.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.