Signs specific to a state

[ElishaGOtis]

Nevada has a whole host of animal-silhouette warning signs that don't appear in the federal manual. Notable ones are the burro warning sign (what other state needs that?) and the cattle warning sign (normally paired with an "Open Range" plaque).

California and Nevada have their own version of the bear crossing sign that has twice the number of bears as the federal bear crossing sign.

The left-turn-lane signs in Clark County are subtly different from the federal ones, to make it easier to indicate a U turn as a possibility.

Maryland has its "Lane Ends" warning sign with the downward diagonal arrows.

A lot of states *COULD* use jackass warnings!

I'm kinda surprised I've never seen any signage, let alone any warning by a public agency, regarding an increased number of drunk drivers on a specific night. Yes, some may be "common knowledge" (like New Years and such), but how does one differentiate between that and an abnormal scenario (I.e. non-recurring football game)?

[Flint1979]

"Trucks use right 2 lanes" does not mean the same as "No trucks in left lane" when there are more than 3 lanes.

It means the trucks are to stay in the two lanes closest to the right shoulder and are prohibited from using the far-left lane. It's not even enforced anyway.

[Quillz]

I don't have a pic handy, but California has the "people crossing the freeway" signs that don't directly imply anything, but you can probably read between the lines since they're located very close to the border with Mexico. I don't know if the other border states have them.

[pderocco]

I don't have a pic handy, but California has the "people crossing the freeway" signs that don't directly imply anything, but you can probably read between the lines since they're located very close to the border with Mexico. I don't know if the other border states have them.

The only one I ever saw was on I-5 a couple miles before the San Onofre checkpoint. But that's been gone for years.

But the image was preserved for a while by this sign put up by a Mexican restaurant in Topanga:



I think the highway original was the mirror of this.

[Quillz]

Woah, where in Topanga is that? I drive CA-27 all the time and have never seen that.

[pderocco]

Woah, where in Topanga is that? I drive CA-27 all the time and have never seen that.

It's gone now, since the restaurant closed in 2017, but it was on Old Topanga Canyon Rd, close to where it it comes into Topanga Canyon Blvd.

[Quillz]

Woah, where in Topanga is that? I drive CA-27 all the time and have never seen that.

It's gone now, since the restaurant closed in 2017, but it was on Old Topanga Canyon Rd, close to where it it comes into Topanga Canyon Blvd.

Oh, I never noticed it. There's a little hotel right at that intersection, and a couple small shops. But I work nights so I wasn't likely to have seen it anyway.

[GaryV]

"Trucks use right 2 lanes" does not mean the same as "No trucks in left lane" when there are more than 3 lanes.

It means the trucks are to stay in the two lanes closest to the right shoulder and are prohibited from using the far-left lane. It's not even enforced anyway.

If there are 4 lanes, then the left lane prohibited means trucks can use 3 of the 4 lanes. Right 2 lanes only means 2 lanes. That was my point.

I agree on the enforcement.

[Mr. Matté]

I'm kinda surprised I've never seen any signage, let alone any warning by a public agency, regarding an increased number of drunk drivers on a specific night. Yes, some may be "common knowledge" (like New Years and such), but how does one differentiate between that and an abnormal scenario (I.e. non-recurring football game)?

Pennsylvania seems to know where the drunks seem to congregate. These random yellow safety message signs I think also apply to the theme of this thread too having not seen them in other states.