Interstates Adopting Mile/Exit Numbers Of Existing State/US Route

[bassoon1986]

I-69 could prove interesting in this matter.

- What about Texas?  Does, for example, 69E use US 77's mileage?

TxDOT has said that each branch of I-69 including the mainline will all have a mile marker 0. So, I-69E, W, and C will all have a zero near the Mexico border and I-69 will have a mile marker zero near Victoria where 69E and 69W converge.

[hbelkins]

First and second times I ever traveled the Morgantown-to-Hancock route, it was US 48. Can't remember if it had exit numbers or not, but if it did, I-68 would have adopted the existing numbers.

[CNGL-Leudimin]

TxDOT has said that each branch of I-69 including the mainline will all have a mile marker 0. So, I-69E, W, and C will all have a zero near the Mexico border and I-69 will have a mile marker zero near Victoria where 69E and 69W converge.

I'd rather have 'plain' I-69 mile markers continuing those of the longest branch. I believe I-69C (continuing on I-69W) will be the longest. IMO I-69C should have been 'plain' I-69.

[vdeane]

IMO I-69E should be plain I-69 (as appears to have been the original plan when it was signed in Corpus Christi), I-69W and I-69C do not strike me as necessary, but if it were built, it strikes me as better as I-2 (existing I-2 could be a 3di, or I-69W could be I-6 instead).

[Bickendan]

I-84 in Oregon. It just happens to have its origin on the origin of the Columbia River Highway portion of US 30, thanks to Oregon's internal highway system