News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Intentionally Omitted Movements on Signs

Started by nwi_navigator_1181, July 30, 2013, 11:03:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

nwi_navigator_1181

Forgive the wording of this topic. To guide you, I'll provide an example right out of the gate.

On the Eastbound Indiana Toll Road (I-90 only at this point), there are signs that read, "Interstate 94, US 6, Indiana 51: Lake Station/Detroit, xx miles." What is not mentioned, however, is that I-80 west is part of this interchange. I-80 east, which joins I-90, is mentioned only in fleeting on an overhead trailblazer. Granted, I'm sure this move was done to avoid confusing drivers with "wrong way" movements (a large majority of drivers using this exit transition to I-94 east unless they wish to use Indiana 51).

Are there any examples such as these you have come across in your journeys? Let me know here. Thank you in advance for your responses, as always.
"Slower Traffic Keep Right" means just that.
You use turn signals. Every Time. Every Transition.


Alps

I've certainly come across different destinations for the same (all-movements) exit, because a different exit better serves some of that traffic in one of the directions. In terms of not mentioning a route? NJ 44 is omitted from NB Exit 21 (in fact, every exit after 14): www.alpsroads.net/roads/nj/i-295/n.html, but is mentioned in SB Exits 21, 20, and 19: www.alpsroads.net/roads/nj/i-295/s.html



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.