News:

While the Forum is up and running, there are still thousands of guests (bots). Downtime may occur as a result.
- Alex

Main Menu

Driver circles Manhattan in 24 minutes.

Started by Duke87, September 04, 2013, 07:22:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Duke87

Link

Video:


Per Google Maps, the route is 24.3 miles... so the average speed is only about 60 MPH. But when you consider the need to stop for several red lights and navigate around other traffic on the road driving normal speeds, it is a nice achievement of the "don't try this at home" variety. Normal time with no traffic is 38 minutes. (no traffic... heh)
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.


Brandon

Manhattan is a small island.  Very small island.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

Alps

I've been able to average faster than 60 mph on the Hank Hudson and FDR. Once you get past about 34th St. West Dr. starts moving pretty well, though I wouldn't be going much above 40 there just because it's the one road where things are actually enforced in NYC.

dlainhart

I hope he had a good time obliterating his struts.

BamaZeus

I think he ran one red light down by Chelsea Piers, and he certainly drove like a maniac the entire trip.  He nearly crashed into a van where the FDR goes down to 1 lane, and cut off several other cars.

agentsteel53

live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

empirestate

Yeah, definitely seen this jerkoff or ones just like him around town. I don't understand why he keeps stopping at the red lights; he's certainly not doing any of the other things he's required to.

Alps

Quote from: empirestate on September 05, 2013, 05:32:41 PM
Yeah, definitely seen this jerkoff or ones just like him around town. I don't understand why he keeps stopping at the red lights; he's certainly not doing any of the other things he's required to.
West Dr. has several red light cameras.

agentsteel53

Quote from: Steve on September 05, 2013, 05:51:19 PM
Quote from: empirestate on September 05, 2013, 05:32:41 PM
Yeah, definitely seen this jerkoff or ones just like him around town. I don't understand why he keeps stopping at the red lights; he's certainly not doing any of the other things he's required to.
West Dr. has several red light cameras.

at that point, he should just take off his license plates and wear a ski mask.  if he gets pulled over, he's cooked no matter what for reckless driving.  so he may as well avoid the photo enforcement.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

empirestate

Quote from: Steve on September 05, 2013, 05:51:19 PM
Quote from: empirestate on September 05, 2013, 05:32:41 PM
Yeah, definitely seen this jerkoff or ones just like him around town. I don't understand why he keeps stopping at the red lights; he's certainly not doing any of the other things he's required to.
West Dr. has several red light cameras.

Yes, but if that worried him, he would not have intentionally created video evidence of everything else he did illegally.

corco


agentsteel53

and, as is the custom with newspaper websites, don't read the comments.  lots of idiotic discussion by people who can't understand that both artificially low speed limits and reckless driving can exist in the same universe.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

BamaZeus

Per the article, his charges include:

reckless endangerment, reckless driving, a traffic device violation, moving from a lane unsafely, following too closely and for a speed violation

What is a "traffic device violation"?  I presume that's where he ran the red light on West Drive.

Henry

Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

empirestate

Quote from: BamaZeus on September 06, 2013, 11:40:03 AM
Per the article, his charges include:

reckless endangerment, reckless driving, a traffic device violation, moving from a lane unsafely, following too closely and for a speed violation

What is a "traffic device violation"?  I presume that's where he ran the red light on West Drive.

Probably, although it could also refer to any other sign or signal. They could maybe apply this charge to speed limit signs (it's happened to me), if they can't specifically measure his speed at a certain point but could prove overall that he was speeding.

Duke87

If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

NE2

Really, all they needed was one camera on the route that they could go through the tape of and match to other cars on the road.
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

place-saint-henri

this is suuuuuuble. Fastest I did was like 40 minutes in my 1995 Subaru Legacy LS Wagon (stock no mods) at 3 AM with no traffic.

dlainhart

Quote from: NE2 on September 06, 2013, 10:18:20 PM
Really, all they needed was one camera on the route that they could go through the tape of and match to other cars on the road.
Exactly. Who cares about IP addresses when that one red light camera is more than enough? You don't even need that: you just need

  • footage from a camera, somewhere, that was recording that night, and
  • the video itself, which is as damning as it gets
The first one can be substituted in a variety of ways, since his own video is what does him in.

hbelkins

For traffic violations, wouldn't the cops actually have to see them to issue a citation? I know that's one of the big complaints about red light cameras; that there's no citing officer.

I'd like to see that in real time instead of sped up 4x to see if there really was reckless driving involved. I suspect there wasn't anything much more grievous than things I see every time I'm on the interstate in Lexington.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

kkt

Quote from: dlainhart on September 14, 2013, 10:12:52 AM
Quote from: NE2 on September 06, 2013, 10:18:20 PM
Really, all they needed was one camera on the route that they could go through the tape of and match to other cars on the road.
Exactly. Who cares about IP addresses when that one red light camera is more than enough? You don't even need that: you just need

  • footage from a camera, somewhere, that was recording that night, and
  • the video itself, which is as damning as it gets
The first one can be substituted in a variety of ways, since his own video is what does him in.

I think a defense attorney could successfully make a case that the video could have been faked.  There are plenty of people who'd like to brag about how fast they drove, and it's not that hard to fake a video.  Think about chain of custody requirements for evidence in police custody, there's no chain of custody for youtube videos.

Dr Frankenstein

#21
Quote from: Duke87 on September 06, 2013, 09:38:21 PM
Quote from: corco on September 05, 2013, 11:03:18 PM
And...he's in custody

http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/police-hunt-for-driver-who-raced-around-manhattan/

Dumbass clearly didn't understand the concept of logging IP addresses and how uniquely that can identify you.

My WAN IP can't discriminate me from the rest of my immediate family.

However, it looks a lot like a BMW Z4 hood in the video (what Japlonik claims he drives), and I don't think his entire household drives one. Or a car with a similarly shaped front end. (From this perspective, it could match a Nissan Maxima and most Infinitis.)

Anyway, my point is, I fail to see how an IP address can isolate a single person beyond reasonable doubt.

(#1000!)

hbelkins

Moral of this story, if you're concerned about being identified via your IP address or other technology-related giveaways.

1.) Create a throwaway email address.
2.) Create a YouTube account with said throwaway email address.
3.) Upload your video from a public wi-fi hotspot.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

agentsteel53

Quote from: Dr Frankenstein on September 17, 2013, 09:26:58 AMI fail to see how an IP address can isolate a single person beyond reasonable doubt.


we're talking about a government attempting to regulate the internet based on squeezing as much interpretation as possible out of the words "to establish post offices and post roads".

"reasonable doubt" - or reasonable anything, really - was never a participant in this conversation.
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Duke87

Quote from: Dr Frankenstein on September 17, 2013, 09:26:58 AM
Anyway, my point is, I fail to see how an IP address can isolate a single person beyond reasonable doubt.

It doesn't, but it's enough to get a search warrant. And then when they find the video on your hard drive both edited and raw, the car in your driveway...

If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.