News:

Thank you for your patience during the Forum downtime while we upgraded the software. Welcome back and see this thread for some new features and other changes to the forum.

Main Menu

W.Va.: 1 dead, 2 dozen hurt in collision between logging truck, train

Started by cpzilliacus, October 11, 2013, 10:28:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

cpzilliacus

Washington Post: Officials: 1 dead, 2 dozen hurt in collision between logging truck, train on scenic W.Va. tour

QuoteA logging truck collided Friday with a train carrying passengers on a scenic tour amid peak fall foliage season in the West Virginia mountains, killing one person and injuring 24 people Friday, authorities said. Two of the rail cars turned on their sides.

QuoteThe cause of the accident between the truck and the Durbin & Greenbrier Railroad train on an excursion at the height of autumn leaf-watching season in the state's mountainous eastern region wasn't immediately known.

QuoteTwo rail passenger cars overturned in the accident at 1:30 p.m. Friday along U.S. Route 250 about 160 miles east of Charleston at Cheat Mountain, said emergency services director Shawn Dunbrack of Pocahontas County.
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.


froggie


Bitmapped

Quote from: froggie on October 13, 2013, 02:09:04 PM
As I recall, that crossing has signals but no gates.
Correct.

About half of the train had already crossed when the truck hit.  Gates likely wouldn't have made any difference here.

cpzilliacus

Quote from: Bitmapped on October 13, 2013, 02:35:21 PM
Gates likely wouldn't have made any difference here.

Perhaps if the driver had obeyed the traffic control devices in place at the grade crossing, this might not have happened?
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.

cpzilliacus

WVDOH has installed an advance warning sign on eastbound W.Va. 90 in Grant County approaching the (ungated) grade crossing near Bayard (the railroad line in question is used by coal trains servicing the Mount Storm generating station).

Ideally, that advance warning sign (located on a fairly steep descent) would have flashing beacons when the  crossing is blocked, but this one does not.
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.

seicer

There are signs on US 250 that warn of a grade crossing a mile in advance on both sides. One is coming down a grade, the other is around a blind curve. The logging truck was either losing his brakes coming down the hill or didn't notice the lights. Seeing as it was a logging truck and the drivers are local, the driver must have known about the crossing.

Bitmapped

Quote from: Sherman Cahal on October 16, 2013, 12:45:45 PM
There are signs on US 250 that warn of a grade crossing a mile in advance on both sides. One is coming down a grade, the other is around a blind curve. The logging truck was either losing his brakes coming down the hill or didn't notice the lights. Seeing as it was a logging truck and the drivers are local, the driver must have known about the crossing.

I've driven this route a couple dozen times.  Other than the standard RxR signs a couple hundred feet before the crossing and a "Railroad Signal Ahead" sign on US 250 southbound, I don't recall there being any special advance signage.  I didn't quickly see anything on Google Street View either.

As far as WV goes, the grade on US 250 northbound through here is pretty minor.  It is about 2%.

The driver was a local, so it's doubtful any amount of advance warning signage would have made a difference.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.