New rules for political content in signatures and user profiles. See this thread for details.
LaDOTD gem of the day:They must have hired someone from Massachusetts.
Wisconsin's message of the day: NO FOOLINGTEXTING AND DRIVING KILLS
Quote from: jbnv on April 01, 2019, 11:37:15 AMLaDOTD gem of the day: <snip> They must have hired someone from Massachusetts. It appears you cannot direct-link pictures from slack.com.
LaDOTD gem of the day: <snip> They must have hired someone from Massachusetts.
🤣🤣👏👏 pic.twitter.com/0UY08ctz3n— Gary Lineker (@GaryLineker) April 8, 2019
🤣🤣👏👏 pic.twitter.com/0UY08ctz3n
On my way through Monmouth County, NJ today on Kozloski Road, CR 55, just north of the 33 Bus. interchange was a VMS flashing "MONMOUTH COUNTY ROUTE 55" and that's it. I'd think it would be cheaper to just install a new reassurance shield.
Quote from: Mr. Matté on April 06, 2019, 11:53:16 AMOn my way through Monmouth County, NJ today on Kozloski Road, CR 55, just north of the 33 Bus. interchange was a VMS flashing "MONMOUTH COUNTY ROUTE 55" and that's it. I'd think it would be cheaper to just install a new reassurance shield.That made me fall out of my chair and hit my chin on my table... Why is that SO FUNNY?
Quote from: MCRoads on April 10, 2019, 07:13:53 PMQuote from: Mr. Matté on April 06, 2019, 11:53:16 AMOn my way through Monmouth County, NJ today on Kozloski Road, CR 55, just north of the 33 Bus. interchange was a VMS flashing "MONMOUTH COUNTY ROUTE 55" and that's it. I'd think it would be cheaper to just install a new reassurance shield.That made me fall out of my chair and hit my chin on my table... Why is that SO FUNNY?Reminds me of this classic...
Quote from: kphoger on April 01, 2019, 03:01:55 PMQuote from: jbnv on April 01, 2019, 11:37:15 AMLaDOTD gem of the day: <snip> They must have hired someone from Massachusetts. It appears you cannot direct-link pictures from slack.com.Well, you can, but if you aren't on the team you won't see it. (Appeared just fine for me.)Blinkers by Jay Bienvenu, on Flickr
Illustrating one of my pet peeves. Installing overhead sign structure uprights immediately in front of existing ground-mounted signs, thus obscuring the view of the signs from a distance. And if it isn't practical to install the support behind the ground-mounted sign, at least relocate the sign to in front of the new support.
Quote from: roadman on April 11, 2019, 10:56:32 AMIllustrating one of my pet peeves. Installing overhead sign structure uprights immediately in front of existing ground-mounted signs, thus obscuring the view of the signs from a distance. And if it isn't practical to install the support behind the ground-mounted sign, at least relocate the sign to in front of the new support.Cool, that's two separate pet peeves for two separate people in one photo. (Mine is DOTD's use of VMSs to lecture us about road rules instead of reporting on travel times or upcoming road conditions.)