AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct  (Read 1281 times)

Max Rockatansky

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12082
  • Age: 37
  • Location: Route 9, Sector 26
  • Last Login: Today at 08:35:52 PM
    • Gribblenation
West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« on: May 08, 2018, 12:41:00 AM »

I used the Spokane Viaduct while returning southbound towards Seatac this morning.  Afforded some decent pictures of the West Seattle Bridge from below:

https://flic.kr/s/aHsmkcLNEc

Ended up with some decent distance shots near Hamilton Viewpoint:

https://flic.kr/s/aHskAMhidq
« Last Edit: May 08, 2018, 03:17:24 PM by Bickendan »
Logged

Max Rockatansky

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12082
  • Age: 37
  • Location: Route 9, Sector 26
  • Last Login: Today at 08:35:52 PM
    • Gribblenation
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2018, 03:06:30 PM »

Updated my album with a blog post.  I think that I documented all the historical Spokane Street crossings:

http://surewhynotnow.blogspot.com/2018/05/spokane-street-bridge-and-west-seattle.html
Logged

Bruce

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2644
  • Transit Commuter

  • Age: 23
  • Location: Snohomish County, WA
  • Last Login: Today at 05:57:32 PM
    • Wikipedia
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2020, 11:50:52 PM »

I figure we should be using this thread for West Seattle Bridge news.

Seattle recently issued a bid for design a new West Seattle Bridge, with a potential 10-year contract. There is also a 31-member task force that will explore options, including a shallow tunnel, gondola, and anything other than rebuilding the same flawed design.

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/sdot-solicits-engineers-to-design-a-replacement-for-the-cracked-west-seattle-bridge/

Bickendan

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2529
  • Last Login: July 08, 2020, 05:18:50 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2020, 07:11:35 AM »

My vote's for the vehicle trebuchet.


Oh wait. I'm told that would very impractical...
Logged

Chris

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2339
  • International road enthusiast

  • Age: 32
  • Location: the Netherlands
  • Last Login: Today at 04:59:51 PM
    • Flickr
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2020, 03:59:41 PM »

What is actually flawed in the design? This bridge type is commonly used across the world in any type of terrain and environment. Or was there a construction deficiency? There's also speculation about the possibility of earthquake damage.

jakeroot

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 11443
  • U/Wash - Urban Design

  • Age: 24
  • Location: Seattle and Tacoma, WA Vancouver, BC | Arlington, VA
  • Last Login: Today at 08:42:51 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2020, 05:24:39 PM »

What is actually flawed in the design? This bridge type is commonly used across the world in any type of terrain and environment. Or was there a construction deficiency? There's also speculation about the possibility of earthquake damage.

I don't think the actual design flaw is quite clear yet. The earthquake likely had a role given the bridge's close proximity to the east-west Seattle Fault, which was only discovered as seismically hazardous in 1992, eight years after the West Seattle Bridge opened.

If that's the case, this would almost certainly make the West Seattle Bridge, and possibly the low level bridge, the last bridges constructed in the Seattle area where the structures were not built to designed to withstand significant earthquakes. But that is a total guess, and the I-90 bridge and the rest of the I-90 ramps in Seattle were also constructed in the early 90s, around the time of the fault discovery, so they could also be in trouble. Maybe.
Logged

Alps

  • Everybody Obeys the Octagon
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 13382
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 37
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 01:22:14 PM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2020, 12:55:14 AM »

What is actually flawed in the design? This bridge type is commonly used across the world in any type of terrain and environment. Or was there a construction deficiency? There's also speculation about the possibility of earthquake damage.
Something about the steel bars rusting through tells me there was an issue with materials or methods during construction.

kkt

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4686
  • Location: Seattle, Washington
  • Last Login: Today at 07:38:12 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2020, 02:38:25 PM »

My vote's for the vehicle trebuchet.


Oh wait. I'm told that would very impractical...

 :-D
Logged

kkt

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4686
  • Location: Seattle, Washington
  • Last Login: Today at 07:38:12 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2020, 02:40:40 PM »

I would think it would be wiser to find out why the current bridge failed prematurely before putting out bids for a new one, so they can tell what they need to specify in the replacement.
Logged

jakeroot

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 11443
  • U/Wash - Urban Design

  • Age: 24
  • Location: Seattle and Tacoma, WA Vancouver, BC | Arlington, VA
  • Last Login: Today at 08:42:51 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2020, 03:17:47 PM »

I would think it would be wiser to find out why the current bridge failed prematurely before putting out bids for a new one, so they can tell what they need to specify in the replacement.

I would be incredibly surprised if any replacement was considered, voted on, designed, built, and opened without some extensive research done on why the prior bridge failed. People are already begging for answers.
Logged

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4009
  • Age: 37
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: Today at 01:19:14 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2020, 11:33:22 AM »

I would think it would be wiser to find out why the current bridge failed prematurely before putting out bids for a new one, so they can tell what they need to specify in the replacement.

I would be incredibly surprised if any replacement was considered, voted on, designed, built, and opened without some extensive research done on why the prior bridge failed. People are already begging for answers.

Just a terminology note: When referring to a "bridge failure", that typically means that some portion of the bridge collapsed. That hasn't happened here, to my knowledge. But potentially some subsystem of the bridge's overall structure may have failed, causing the damage to the bridge that prompted the closure.

But yes, it would seem very prudent to figure out the cause of the structural issue prior to taking next steps on repair/replacement.
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

jakeroot

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 11443
  • U/Wash - Urban Design

  • Age: 24
  • Location: Seattle and Tacoma, WA Vancouver, BC | Arlington, VA
  • Last Login: Today at 08:42:51 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2020, 05:52:53 PM »

I would think it would be wiser to find out why the current bridge failed prematurely before putting out bids for a new one, so they can tell what they need to specify in the replacement.

I would be incredibly surprised if any replacement was considered, voted on, designed, built, and opened without some extensive research done on why the prior bridge failed. People are already begging for answers.

Just a terminology note: When referring to a "bridge failure", that typically means that some portion of the bridge collapsed. That hasn't happened here, to my knowledge. But potentially some subsystem of the bridge's overall structure may have failed, causing the damage to the bridge that prompted the closure.

But yes, it would seem very prudent to figure out the cause of the structural issue prior to taking next steps on repair/replacement.

Totally understood. I was just being casual with my terminology. But thank you, because I'm still learning all the terms.
Logged

kkt

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4686
  • Location: Seattle, Washington
  • Last Login: Today at 07:38:12 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2020, 09:56:14 PM »

Oh, that was me... I did not know that "failed" only meant it fell down, not that it became unusable.
Logged

jakeroot

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 11443
  • U/Wash - Urban Design

  • Age: 24
  • Location: Seattle and Tacoma, WA Vancouver, BC | Arlington, VA
  • Last Login: Today at 08:42:51 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2020, 10:15:26 PM »

Oh, that was me... I did not know that "failed" only meant it fell down, not that it became unusable.

I mean, it is rather interesting that the bridge, even if it doesn't fall over, cannot be considered as having "failed".

What's the term for a bridge that will fail but is taken down before it does? Because that seems to be the case with the West Seattle Bridge.
Logged

Alps

  • Everybody Obeys the Octagon
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 13382
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 37
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 01:22:14 PM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2020, 10:44:41 PM »

Oh, that was me... I did not know that "failed" only meant it fell down, not that it became unusable.

I mean, it is rather interesting that the bridge, even if it doesn't fall over, cannot be considered as having "failed".

What's the term for a bridge that will fail but is taken down before it does? Because that seems to be the case with the West Seattle Bridge.
Imminent failure, perhaps? Unstable?

TEG24601

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 829
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Whidbey Island, WA
  • Last Login: Today at 03:13:58 PM
    • Tegianzone
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2020, 03:36:14 PM »

Condemned?
Logged
They said take a left at the fork in the road.  I didn't think they literally meant a fork, until plain as day, there was a fork sticking out of the road at a junction.

jakeroot

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 11443
  • U/Wash - Urban Design

  • Age: 24
  • Location: Seattle and Tacoma, WA Vancouver, BC | Arlington, VA
  • Last Login: Today at 08:42:51 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2020, 03:54:58 PM »

Condemned?

Once it gets to that point, I like this the best so far.

Oh, that was me... I did not know that "failed" only meant it fell down, not that it became unusable.

I mean, it is rather interesting that the bridge, even if it doesn't fall over, cannot be considered as having "failed".

What's the term for a bridge that will fail but is taken down before it does? Because that seems to be the case with the West Seattle Bridge.
Imminent failure, perhaps? Unstable?

I prefer TEG's term primarily because it can fit within the context of the original sentence, which is about a bridge that will fail. Both "imminent" and "unstable" imply, to me, something that could be saved. Something that is "condemned" or "failed" is a lost cause.

To the best of my knowledge, the West Seattle Bridge is a lost cause. That's the impression I get from city leaders.
Logged

MikieTimT

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 441
  • Age: 47
  • Location: Wedington Woods, Arkansas
  • Last Login: July 08, 2020, 11:50:32 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2020, 05:32:31 PM »

Oh, that was me... I did not know that "failed" only meant it fell down, not that it became unusable.

I mean, it is rather interesting that the bridge, even if it doesn't fall over, cannot be considered as having "failed".

What's the term for a bridge that will fail but is taken down before it does? Because that seems to be the case with the West Seattle Bridge.
Imminent failure, perhaps? Unstable?
The term most likely used for this bridge might be summarized as "stupid engineer."
Logged

kkt

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4686
  • Location: Seattle, Washington
  • Last Login: Today at 07:38:12 PM
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2020, 05:51:28 PM »

Oh, that was me... I did not know that "failed" only meant it fell down, not that it became unusable.

I mean, it is rather interesting that the bridge, even if it doesn't fall over, cannot be considered as having "failed".

What's the term for a bridge that will fail but is taken down before it does? Because that seems to be the case with the West Seattle Bridge.
Imminent failure, perhaps? Unstable?
The term most likely used for this bridge might be summarized as "stupid engineer."

We could wait for the investigation to be done before we decide it was the engineer's fault...
Logged

Alps

  • Everybody Obeys the Octagon
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 13382
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 37
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 01:22:14 PM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #19 on: June 12, 2020, 01:48:41 AM »

Condemned?

Once it gets to that point, I like this the best so far.

Oh, that was me... I did not know that "failed" only meant it fell down, not that it became unusable.

I mean, it is rather interesting that the bridge, even if it doesn't fall over, cannot be considered as having "failed".

What's the term for a bridge that will fail but is taken down before it does? Because that seems to be the case with the West Seattle Bridge.
Imminent failure, perhaps? Unstable?

I prefer TEG's term primarily because it can fit within the context of the original sentence, which is about a bridge that will fail. Both "imminent" and "unstable" imply, to me, something that could be saved. Something that is "condemned" or "failed" is a lost cause.

To the best of my knowledge, the West Seattle Bridge is a lost cause. That's the impression I get from city leaders.
From a structural point of view, failure means the structure has partially or fully collapsed. Condemned is a decision that may or may not be related to structural issues. "Imminent failure" descibes an unsafe condition that warrants closing the structure and condemning it if repairs cannot be made.

Bruce

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2644
  • Transit Commuter

  • Age: 23
  • Location: Snohomish County, WA
  • Last Login: Today at 05:57:32 PM
    • Wikipedia
Re: West Seattle Bridge and Spokane Viaduct
« Reply #20 on: June 29, 2020, 09:07:56 PM »

New from The Seattle Times: SDOT plans new cables and carbon wraps to keep West Seattle Bridge standing

Quote
Armed with carbon strips and steel cables, construction workers will soon begin emergency shoring of the West Seattle Bridge in an effort that could last until late October.

The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT), in a blog post describing the methods, said Monday that the job will begin this week.

The first step is to reopen more than 100 holes on the edges of the deck that were filled following construction in the early 1980s. These holes were once used to mount a crane-like gantry, called the form traveler, that moved the molds where builders poured concrete 16.5 feet at a time.

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.