News:

Finished coding the back end of the AARoads main site using object-orientated programming. One major step closer to moving away from Wordpress!

Main Menu

Freeways without route numbers?

Started by Hwy 61 Revisited, April 07, 2020, 11:11:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

sprjus4

^

Quote from: hbelkins on April 08, 2020, 11:44:43 AM
Kentucky's parkways have internal route numbers, but they aren't signed.


sbeaver44



Quote from: OCGuy81 on April 20, 2020, 11:58:29 AM
Also isn't the Chicago Skyway *technically* not part of I 90?

Wikipedia does a decent job explaining that conundrum.  I consider it I-90.

"However, around 1999, the City of Chicago realized they had never received official approval to designate the Skyway as I-90. The city subsequently replaced most of the "I-90" signage with "TO I-90/I-94" signage. However, the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) has always and continues to report the Skyway as part of the Interstate Highway System, and the Federal Highway Administration also considers the Chicago Skyway an official part of I-90.[16]"

OCGuy81

Quote from: sbeaver44 on April 20, 2020, 06:37:44 PM


Quote from: OCGuy81 on April 20, 2020, 11:58:29 AM
Also isn't the Chicago Skyway *technically* not part of I 90?

Wikipedia does a decent job explaining that conundrum.  I consider it I-90.

"However, around 1999, the City of Chicago realized they had never received official approval to designate the Skyway as I-90. The city subsequently replaced most of the "I-90" signage with "TO I-90/I-94" signage. However, the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) has always and continues to report the Skyway as part of the Interstate Highway System, and the Federal Highway Administration also considers the Chicago Skyway an official part of I-90.[16]"

That's helpful! Thank you!

bing101

#103
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storrow_Drive

Storrow Drive in Boston is a parkway without a route number. Its because Storrow Drive is managed by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and recreation. 




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Conservation_and_Recreation



DJ Particle

Quote from: bing101 on April 28, 2020, 07:22:56 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storrow_Drive

Storrow Drive in Boston is a parkway without a route number. Its because Storrow Drive is managed by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and recreation. 




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Conservation_and_Recreation



Parts of it are MA-3 and MA-28.  Before 1989, parts were also US-1

JayhawkCO

I don't think anyone mentioned the Northwest Parkway in the Denver Metro.

Chris

andrepoiy

In Toronto we have the Gardiner Expressway, Don Valley Parkway, and Allen Road, which are all controlled-access freeways and have no number associated.



deathtopumpkins

Quote from: bing101 on April 28, 2020, 07:22:56 PM
Storrow Drive in Boston is a parkway without a route number. Its because Storrow Drive is managed by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and recreation. 

It's also not a freeway.* I don't think this thread was intended to list 'almost-freeways' like some of the DCR parkways.

*You could make the case that the entirety of what is technically Storrow Drive (the roughly 2 mile portion from the BU Bridge to the Hatch Shell) is a freeway, as the only at-grade intersections on that stretch are 'official use only' driveways, but it'd be a real stretch. The same could be said for Soldiers Field Rd west as far as the Anderson Bridge.

Quote from: DJ Particle on April 29, 2020, 02:04:49 AM
Parts of it are MA-3 and MA-28.  Before 1989, parts were also US-1

Technically none of Storrow Drive is concurrent with MA 3 or MA 28. Heading north/eastbound, MA 28 joins the road at the Copley Sq interchange (by the Hatch Shell), and MA 3 joins at the Charles Circle interchange, both of which are on David G Mugar Way, Storrow Drive having ended at the Copley Sq interchange.
Disclaimer: All posts represent my personal opinions and not those of my employer.

Clinched Highways | Counties Visited

sprjus4

Quote from: deathtopumpkins on April 29, 2020, 10:51:44 AM
It's also not a freeway.* I don't think this thread was intended to list 'almost-freeways' like some of the DCR parkways.
QuoteThe Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (7) defines a freeway as a divided highway with full control of access and two or more lanes for the exclusive use of traffic in each direction. Freeways provide uninterrupted flow (Note: "Uninterrupted"  is used to describe the type of facility, not the quality of the traffic flow at any given time. A freeway experiencing extreme congestion, for example, is still an uninterrupted-flow facility because the causes of congestion are internal.) Opposing directions of flow are continuously separated by a raised barrier, an at-grade median, or a continuous raised median (Figure 1-4). Operating conditions on a freeway primarily result from interactions among vehicles and drivers in the traffic stream and among vehicles, drivers, and the geometric characteristics of the freeway.
QuoteThe AASHTO "Green Book" (13) defines freeways as "arterial highways with full control of access. They are intended to provide for high levels of safety and efficiency in the movement of large volumes of traffic at high speeds. With full control of access, preference is given to through traffic by providing access connections with selected public roads only and by prohibiting crossings at grade and private driveway connections".
No matter how substandard it is, it's still a freeway. Limited access, access only at ramps, cross roads grade separated, etc.

https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freewaymgmt/publications/frwy_mgmt_handbook/chapter1_02.htm

kphoger

Quote from: jayhawkco on April 29, 2020, 10:22:44 AM
I don't think anyone mentioned the Northwest Parkway in the Denver Metro.

Chris

You think anyone will?

He Is Already Here! Let's Go, Flamingo!
Dost thou understand the graveness of the circumstances?
Deut 23:13
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: PKDIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

hobsini2

Quote from: OCGuy81 on April 20, 2020, 11:58:29 AM
Has anyone mentioned Kentucky's parkways yet? Other than the section running I-69, aren't these unnumbered?

Also isn't the Chicago Skyway *technically* not part of I 90?
1. The Natcher Pkwy (Green River Pkwy) is now I-165 and is signed as of March 2019ish.  Interestingly though, the newer section that was built south of I-65 to US 231 is signed as KY 9007.
2. The Audobon Pkwy is unsigned KY 9005.
3. The Pennyrile Pkwy is unsigned KY 9004 as of July 2019 but is supposed to be I-169 eventually.
4. The Western Kentucky Pkwy east of the Pennyrile Pkwy is unsigned KY 9001.
5. There is still a section of the Purchase Pkwy (north of I-24/I-69 interchange) that is unsigned KY 9003.
6. The Louie B Nunn (Cumberland Pkwy) is unsigned KY 9008 but does have signs erected for Future I-66.
7. The Hal Rogers Pkwy (Daniel Boone Pkwy) is unsigned KY 9006 for most of it. Part is KY 80. But I would not consider this a "freeway". Way too many cross roads despite the numerous bridges over the parkway.
8. The Blue Grass Parkway is unsigned KY 9002.
9. The Bert Combs Mountain Pkwy is unsigned KY 9000.

Also, the Chicago Skyway is now officially part of I-90 again.
I knew it. I'm surrounded by assholes. Keep firing, assholes! - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

DJ Particle

Quote from: deathtopumpkins on April 29, 2020, 10:51:44 AM
Technically none of Storrow Drive is concurrent with MA 3 or MA 28. Heading north/eastbound, MA 28 joins the road at the Copley Sq interchange (by the Hatch Shell), and MA 3 joins at the Charles Circle interchange, both of which are on David G Mugar Way, Storrow Drive having ended at the Copley Sq interchange.

Hmm...I had thought it was considered by both names at that point.  Google Maps seems to think so.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Storrow+Dr,+Boston,+MA/@42.3603738,-71.0721902,95m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x89e37a014e276e75:0xc0c288be8501d289!8m2!3d42.3520732!4d-71.089115

Seriously...I'm from Massachusetts and I always thought Storrow ran from I-93 to the Pike exit.

deathtopumpkins

Quote from: DJ Particle on April 30, 2020, 12:38:28 AM
Hmm...I had thought it was considered by both names at that point.  Google Maps seems to think so.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Storrow+Dr,+Boston,+MA/@42.3603738,-71.0721902,95m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x89e37a014e276e75:0xc0c288be8501d289!8m2!3d42.3520732!4d-71.089115

Seriously...I'm from Massachusetts and I always thought Storrow ran from I-93 to the Pike exit.

Google Maps labels a lot of things incorrectly. It's unfortunately not really a good source.

Most people refer to the whole thing as Storrow, including east to I-93 and west to at least the Pike interchange, if not the Eliot Bridge, so don't feel bad for not knowing that it's not 'officially' named both.
Disclaimer: All posts represent my personal opinions and not those of my employer.

Clinched Highways | Counties Visited

cbeach40

#113
Ontario has the following:

  • EC Row Expwy, Windsor (only the municipal portion, provincial section has an internal 7000-series number)
  • Highbury Ave, London (was provincial Hwy 126, no number upon transfer to CofL)
  • Nikola Tesla Blvd, Lincoln Alexander Pkwy, and Red Hill Valley Pkwy, Hamilton
  • Pearson Airport access road - 1.3 km of freeway, formerly Highway 409, Mississauga
  • Gardiner Expwy, Don Valley Pkwy, Allen Rd - previously mentioned in thread, all in Toronto
  • Queen Elizabeth Way - Provincial freeway, Fort Erie to Toronto (one small segment is co-designated with Hwy 403, but it in and of itself has no number designated or assigned to it)*



* - yes, while there is a popular misconception in the roadgeek community that it has an internal number but no, it does not have any assigned to it.
and waterrrrrrr!

Hwy 61 Revisited

And you may ask yourself, where does that highway go to?
--David Byrne

hbelkins

Quote from: hobsini2 on April 29, 2020, 07:26:03 PM
Quote from: OCGuy81 on April 20, 2020, 11:58:29 AM
Has anyone mentioned Kentucky's parkways yet? Other than the section running I-69, aren't these unnumbered?

Also isn't the Chicago Skyway *technically* not part of I 90?
1. The Natcher Pkwy (Green River Pkwy) is now I-165 and is signed as of March 2019ish.  Interestingly though, the newer section that was built south of I-65 to US 231 is signed as KY 9007.
2. The Audobon Pkwy is unsigned KY 9005.
3. The Pennyrile Pkwy is unsigned KY 9004 as of July 2019 but is supposed to be I-169 eventually.
4. The Western Kentucky Pkwy east of the Pennyrile Pkwy is unsigned KY 9001.
5. There is still a section of the Purchase Pkwy (north of I-24/I-69 interchange) that is unsigned KY 9003.
6. The Louie B Nunn (Cumberland Pkwy) is unsigned KY 9008 but does have signs erected for Future I-66.
7. The Hal Rogers Pkwy (Daniel Boone Pkwy) is unsigned KY 9006 for most of it. Part is KY 80. But I would not consider this a "freeway". Way too many cross roads despite the numerous bridges over the parkway.
8. The Blue Grass Parkway is unsigned KY 9002.
9. The Bert Combs Mountain Pkwy is unsigned KY 9000.

Also, the Chicago Skyway is now officially part of I-90 again.

I mentioned them early on.

Slight correction: That portion of the Mountain Parkway east of Exit 43 is unsigned KY 9009. The segments between Exits 43-46 and from just west of new Exit 70 to the route's end in Salyersville are four-lane freeway now.
Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Max Rockatansky

I'm not sure if I mentioned this one up thread but part of Pacific Highway (Old US 101) in San Diego is a Freeway grade.  Interestingly part of Grand Loop Road near Old Faithful in Yellowstone National Park is a Freeway grade.  I want to say that was the only segment of fully limited access roadway ever built by the NPS. 

sprjus4

#117
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on April 30, 2020, 02:58:02 PM
I want to say that was the only segment of fully limited access roadway ever built by the NPS.
Two roads constructed by the NPS in the 1950s and 1960s in the Washington-Baltimore metro are built to full freeway standards.

The northern 14 miles of the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Northern Virginia.

The southern 18 miles of the MD-295 Baltimore-Washington Parkway in Southern Maryland.

Today (well, pre-COVID-19), they serve daily commuter traffic, functioning as urban freeways. They do, however, restrict truck traffic. Maryland eventually wants to take the NPS portion of the MD-295 Baltimore-Washington Parkway over and widen it from 4 to 8 lanes north of I-495, upgrading it to interstate standards in the process. It's an important and congested route connecting Washington and Baltimore, along with the NSA Headquarters, BWI Airport, and suburbs in between, that supplements the 8 lane I-95 that parallels it to the north. I don't believe Virginia has any plans for the George Washington Memorial Parkway besides reconstructing the northern interchange with I-495 apart of the I-495 HO/T Lanes Northern Extension project.

CNGL-Leudimin

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on April 30, 2020, 02:58:02 PMInterestingly part of Grand Loop Road near Old Faithful in Yellowstone National Park is a Freeway grade.  I want to say that was the only segment of fully limited access roadway ever built by the NPS. 

Some, including me, may consider that short section of freeway in Yellowstone as having a number. And several of them: US 89, 191 and 287. And depending on who one asks, US 20 (not me).
Supporter of the construction of several running gags, including I-366 with a speed limit of 85 mph (137 km/h) and the Hypotenuse.

Please note that I may mention "invalid" FM channels, i.e. ending in an even number or down to 87.5. These are valid in Europe.

US 89

Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on April 30, 2020, 03:53:01 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on April 30, 2020, 02:58:02 PMInterestingly part of Grand Loop Road near Old Faithful in Yellowstone National Park is a Freeway grade.  I want to say that was the only segment of fully limited access roadway ever built by the NPS. 

Some, including me, may consider that short section of freeway in Yellowstone as having a number. And several of them: US 89, 191 and 287. And depending on who one asks, US 20 (not me).

How can it be 89/191/287 but not 20? No US highways are official within Yellowstone park boundaries.

dfilpus

Quote from: US 89 on April 30, 2020, 05:10:50 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on April 30, 2020, 03:53:01 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on April 30, 2020, 02:58:02 PMInterestingly part of Grand Loop Road near Old Faithful in Yellowstone National Park is a Freeway grade.  I want to say that was the only segment of fully limited access roadway ever built by the NPS. 

Some, including me, may consider that short section of freeway in Yellowstone as having a number. And several of them: US 89, 191 and 287. And depending on who one asks, US 20 (not me).

How can it be 89/191/287 but not 20? No US highways are official within Yellowstone park boundaries.
in the GIS shape-files for the roads in Yellowstone, there is a labeled routing for each of the US highways that cross the park. US 89/191/287 is routed up the west side of the Loop, while US 20 is routed across on Norris-Canyon Road.

sbeaver44

Is Yellowstone the only National Park where roads aren't signed?  Are 191 & 287 signed in Grand Teton?

I'm trying to remember is US 441 is mentioned at Newfound Gap in Great Smoky Mtns NP.

JayhawkCO

Quote from: sbeaver44 on May 01, 2020, 09:03:57 PM
Is Yellowstone the only National Park where roads aren't signed?  Are 191 & 287 signed in Grand Teton?

I'm trying to remember is US 441 is mentioned at Newfound Gap in Great Smoky Mtns NP.

I don't remember any reassurance markers, but US34 and US36 are acknowledged at their junction in Rocky Mountain NP.

Chris

Roadgeekteen

Quote from: sbeaver44 on May 01, 2020, 09:03:57 PM
Is Yellowstone the only National Park where roads aren't signed?  Are 191 & 287 signed in Grand Teton?

I'm trying to remember is US 441 is mentioned at Newfound Gap in Great Smoky Mtns NP.
I think ME 3 and the other state routes are signed in Acadia.
My username has been outdated since August 2023 but I'm too lazy to change it

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: sbeaver44 on May 01, 2020, 09:03:57 PM
Is Yellowstone the only National Park where roads aren't signed?  Are 191 & 287 signed in Grand Teton?

I'm trying to remember is US 441 is mentioned at Newfound Gap in Great Smoky Mtns NP.

None of the US Routes are signed in Yellowstone or Grand Teton.  They used to be signed in Teton but that got yanked as the Park expanded.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.